|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
fed-up
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 02:05 AM Original message |
Going to Canada? Check your past-Visitors with minor criminal records turned back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 02:08 AM Response to Original message |
1. Holy shit! So they get a passport, and then aren't allowed to enter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fed-up
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 02:14 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I wonder if my hitchhiking ticket from when I was 17 and going to Day on the Green |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 03:18 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. "A conviction for marijuana possession. In 1975." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 03:53 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. A lot of states decriminalized possession around that time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4dsc
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 06:27 AM Response to Reply #12 |
18. Makes no difference now! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 06:38 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. yes, big bad old Canada ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amonester
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 11:53 AM Response to Reply #18 |
45. You don't honestly think that "the other way around" is "easier" don't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tuvor
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 02:26 AM Response to Original message |
3. Please post this in the Canada forum, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 02:37 AM Response to Original message |
4. now, we know why this is, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 05:57 AM Response to Reply #4 |
14. thank you for clearing that up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saigon68
![]() |
Sat Feb-24-07 03:45 AM Response to Reply #14 |
60. Look at it this way LC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignacio Upton
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 02:50 AM Response to Original message |
5. So...can Canada refuse Bush because of his DUI? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 08:18 AM Response to Reply #5 |
23. Nah, the law doesn't apply to him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noonwitch
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 09:03 AM Response to Reply #5 |
28. It would be hilarious if they did bar him for that reason, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 10:05 AM Response to Reply #28 |
32. You're assuming Bush can speak English? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amonester
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 10:54 AM Response to Reply #32 |
41. herr bu$che speaks German... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tempest
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 10:30 AM Response to Reply #5 |
38. Yes, but they didn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 10:46 AM Response to Reply #38 |
40. and if Bill had been convicted after not inhaling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 03:13 AM Response to Original message |
6. a DWI???? they won't let you in? good grief! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laundry_queen
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 11:49 AM Response to Reply #6 |
43. It works both ways you know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGD
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 03:16 AM Response to Original message |
7. Talk about fascism. I never had any real desire to go to Canada anyways. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 03:25 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. talk about ignorance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 04:35 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Deleted sub-thread |
cigsandcoffee
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 09:55 AM Response to Reply #11 |
30. Couldn't Canada just say no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 10:08 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. what's wrong with those fool Iraqis, anyhow? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
susanna
![]() |
Sat Feb-24-07 02:29 AM Response to Reply #7 |
59. Read laundry_queens post, above (#43). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 03:20 AM Response to Original message |
9. you should apply for "a Minister's Approval of Rehabilitation" to wipe the record clear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 03:21 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. they hav a website here to find out which offences qualify |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokercat999
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 06:26 AM Response to Reply #10 |
17. Hmmmmm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mainegreen
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 09:01 AM Response to Reply #10 |
27. Cute. Their wording indicates they reserve the right to keep you out for traffic violations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 09:58 AM Response to Reply #27 |
31. "traffic violations" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Howardx
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 10:21 AM Response to Reply #9 |
36. i did that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lligrd
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 06:07 AM Response to Original message |
15. Bush's Way Of Sealing The Borders? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 06:22 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. no, really, it isn't about you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lligrd
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 06:30 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Guess I Have A suspicious Mind Then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 07:44 AM Response to Original message |
21. This isn't new |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 07:52 AM Response to Original message |
22. Not only will this discourage tourism, but also procuring Canadian drugs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 08:26 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. check the embassy link and info above |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 08:32 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Query: Is an expungement equated with a pardon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 08:54 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. uh oh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ken solo
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 09:51 AM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Any first hand experience with this issue?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 10:09 AM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Just came back to the U.S. via the Windsor Tunnel two weeks ago... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 10:16 AM Response to Reply #29 |
35. moi? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 10:38 AM Response to Reply #29 |
39. Yes, I have or at least think I have. It was in 1998. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oreegone
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 06:09 PM Response to Reply #29 |
53. Oh it is real alright |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gormy Cuss
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 06:31 PM Response to Reply #25 |
55. Expunged convictions shouldn't be included, but GIGO rules in data mining.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tempest
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
37. Remember when Canada suspended the law to let Bush in? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shrike
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
42. I grew up in Detroit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laundry_queen
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
44. jeebus people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrangeCountyDemocrat
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 02:06 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Fine, But I Expect Better From Canada |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 03:10 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 03:38 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. Maybe it is tit-for-tat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 04:19 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. hey, we got doozies too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 06:19 PM Response to Reply #47 |
54. "'cause they aren't getting our natural gas" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
49. Hasn't This Already Been Going On for Awhile? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 04:29 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. the Aussie shoulda got a lawyer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 05:33 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. Yeah, I don't think he ever got a Lawyer, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 07:14 PM Response to Reply #49 |
58. I don't think it's new either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
appleannie1
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
56. And when this begins to effect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Fri Feb-23-07 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
57. Not my Experience |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 25th 2024, 05:55 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC