|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Atman
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:10 AM Original message |
CNN Breaking: Supreme Court stops Bush's military tribunals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenca
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:11 AM Response to Original message |
1. On MSNBC too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlrschneider
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:12 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Good news for Democracy (and democracy) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katty
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 12:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
105. yes, it's a good day for democracy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:13 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. This is VERY good news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenca
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:23 AM Response to Reply #4 |
21. YES! They just said that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saigon68
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 12:08 PM Response to Reply #21 |
102. Here is the slug |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tfj2
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 04:47 PM Response to Reply #102 |
138. thanks for the pix.!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katty
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 03:52 PM Response to Reply #21 |
126. o, this is a blow for bushco-time to decapitate monsterboy bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jun-30-06 07:11 AM Response to Reply #4 |
167. Deleted message |
Barad Simith
![]() |
Fri Jun-30-06 08:08 AM Response to Reply #167 |
171. freerepublic.com |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saigon68
![]() |
Sat Jul-01-06 06:47 AM Response to Reply #167 |
174. Au Revoir |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FighttheFuture
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 03:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
124. It's irrelevant and predictable. See my post later. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:12 AM Response to Original message |
3. Whoa!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:14 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Roberts was part of the original ruling in the lower court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:17 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. What Was The Lower Court Ruling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:18 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Roberts was on the lower court which said the tribunals were okay. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:20 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Wait A Sec, How Does This Stop The Tribunals Then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:24 AM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Tune in if you can... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:27 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. I Can't Tune In, But I Read The Posted Article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:44 AM Response to Reply #17 |
83. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 05:00 PM Response to Reply #17 |
142. the reason they remand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Government
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:37 AM Original message |
Delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
39. Really? Thanks for the info. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:41 AM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Contradictory Information, This Article Says Otherwise: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 12:48 PM Response to Reply #40 |
113. That's not contradictory. that is ruling in favor of bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 01:17 PM Response to Reply #113 |
116. One Article States One Thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unda cova brutha
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 05:26 PM Response to Reply #14 |
144. Roberts should resign over this ruling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saigon68
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:18 AM Response to Reply #7 |
75. Roberts has no ethics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:15 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. they said the vote was 5 to 3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:16 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Roberts Recused Himself From the Decison |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:17 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. 5 + 3 equals 8 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tfj2
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 04:50 PM Response to Reply #3 |
139. recused--he already ruled on it!!! guess which way.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mucifer
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
5. good news for people being held illegally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
6. Its only a Supreme Court Decision. How will that effect bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rose Siding
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:15 AM Response to Original message |
8. The writ is the writ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WyLoochka
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:47 AM Response to Reply #8 |
52. Justice Souter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 11:07 AM Response to Reply #8 |
92. I've been screaming about habeas corpus ever since they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
13. Bush will just ignore this. After all, he's The Decider. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:18 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Let him try |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:37 AM Response to Reply #13 |
79. Bush can ignore this. But the non-gods who run Gitmo can't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iverglas
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 02:10 PM Original message |
Thank You - it's very important to counter this "Bush will ignore..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 08:44 PM Response to Original message |
155. Bush WILL ignore it or find a loophole. Mark my words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 11:36 PM Response to Reply #155 |
163. You mean Alberto Gonzales will find a loophole for him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Brethren
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 04:05 PM Response to Reply #13 |
127. If you live long enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintonTyree
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 04:45 PM Response to Reply #127 |
137. I never thought I'd ever see a "public servant" like junior........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Brethren
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 07:18 PM Response to Reply #137 |
150. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 08:20 PM Response to Reply #13 |
153. add it to the impeachment case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:18 AM Response to Original message |
15. Thank goodness. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jerry611
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
18. It doesn't really change anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bacchus39
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 04:24 PM Response to Reply #18 |
131. I agree with your assessment, it doesn't tell Bush to do anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 11:22 PM Response to Reply #18 |
162. You are wrong. This decision was significant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lthuedk
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:22 AM Response to Original message |
19. I got lucky on this one: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:23 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Hey!.. Good one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:25 AM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Wow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Judi Lynn
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:00 AM Response to Reply #19 |
62. Amazing! The sheep are a nice touch, sorta! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSunWithoutShadow
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 11:16 AM Response to Reply #19 |
97. Your Political Imagery Cartoons are Awesome!! - eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 02:21 PM Response to Reply #19 |
121. Very nice work...and prophetic! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbnow
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
25. What a relief |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
26. Thank god! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
27. Bush is Hitler |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:35 AM Response to Reply #27 |
32. That is just plain WRONG! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:45 AM Response to Reply #32 |
48. and . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:46 AM Response to Reply #48 |
51. true, true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gauguin57
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:54 AM Response to Reply #48 |
56. And, Hitler was a painter. Bush: proud of his lack of interest in culture. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:06 AM Response to Reply #56 |
69. Good news. How will Rove & Gonzales twist the signing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonmoy
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:11 PM Response to Reply #32 |
160. Did you forget about reincarnation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rose Siding
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
28. AP Link- Justice Stevens called trials illegal under US law and Geneva |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sam Odom
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
29. "The Supreme Court has made its decision. Now let them enforce it." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:49 AM Response to Reply #29 |
54. So true. The Supreme Court's only enforcement mechanism is the executive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Caoimhe
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:40 AM Response to Reply #29 |
81. that's funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon
![]() |
Fri Jun-30-06 07:47 AM Response to Reply #29 |
170. That was said about two hundred years ago. The Supreme Court is a lot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peaches2003
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
30. No Way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:30 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. I fear you're likely correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenca
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
33. MSNBC : DEALS A BLOW THAT THE PRESIDENT DOES NOT HAVE INHERENT POWER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:36 AM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Some sense of what America represents still exists in D.C.? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenca
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:41 AM Response to Reply #34 |
41. Oh, I hope so!!!!!!! . eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
htuttle
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:57 AM Response to Reply #33 |
58. Hope we can take this precedent and run with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 11:43 PM Response to Reply #33 |
164. If anyone had inherent power it would had been George Washington |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cal04
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
35. from this article Kennedy "joined the liberal members" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Government
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:41 AM Response to Reply #35 |
42. Roberts had recused himself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RangerSmith
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:56 AM Response to Reply #42 |
87. And what really has me curious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxrandb
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:35 AM Response to Reply #35 |
78. Please don't call them "liberal member's" MSM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcscajun
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 04:53 PM Response to Reply #78 |
140. Stevens was nominated by Ford, not JFK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LifeDuringWartime
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
36. lemme guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
54anickel
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 12:51 PM Response to Reply #36 |
114. Nah, he'll have Congress put through whatever they want and just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
37. This is very significant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
38. Jaw dropping in amazement n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
43. Excellent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stop the bleeding
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
44. Freepers heads are exploding I bet :) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:44 AM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Who cares what they think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stop the bleeding
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:54 AM Response to Reply #45 |
57. it was for the humor factor --- like any of us really care about what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gauguin57
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:58 AM Response to Reply #44 |
60. Let's go to the tape, shall we? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stop the bleeding
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:07 AM Response to Reply #60 |
71. thank you here are a few keepers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
otherlander
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 02:01 PM Response to Reply #60 |
118. "Impeach the Supreme Court"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:27 PM Response to Reply #60 |
158. Check out this winner quote: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sam Odom
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
46. (Reuters) "Court ruling to have little impact on Guantanamo" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WyLoochka
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:53 AM Response to Reply #46 |
55. They can now file for habeus corpus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sam Odom
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:05 AM Response to Reply #55 |
66. There will be no OPEN court trials |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jerry611
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:19 AM Response to Reply #55 |
76. Technically that is not correct.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WyLoochka
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:44 AM Response to Reply #76 |
82. Thanks for the info - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
appal_jack
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 04:40 PM Response to Reply #76 |
136. constitutionally, it IS correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stepnw1f
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 06:38 PM Response to Reply #136 |
149. Thanks for the Info (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
47. I suppose even the conservative court doesn't want to see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kurth
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:17 AM Response to Reply #47 |
74. Nah, nothing the GOP Congress can't fix |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Brethren
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 04:20 PM Response to Reply #47 |
128. I pray you're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
49. Justice Kennedy must have come through for us!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grytpype
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
50. Great for democracy, bad for the Bushist scum... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Judi Lynn
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
53. Is there a "next" logical step, like a challenge to keeping them without |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WyLoochka
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:57 AM Response to Reply #53 |
59. I think they will be able to file |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Judi Lynn
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:02 AM Response to Reply #59 |
64. Thank you! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike923
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 03:38 PM Response to Reply #53 |
125. Is there anywhere to donate.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wicket
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
61. Glory, Glory Hallelujah! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Caoimhe
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
63. SCOTUS BITCHSLAPS POTUS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Human Torch
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
65. I wonder if Junior knows the difference between a "rebuke" and a "mandate" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
67. Post story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jerry611
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
68. LOL!! You should hear the righties on the radio!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:10 AM Response to Reply #68 |
72. The LIBERALS handed the terrorists a victory? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcscajun
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 04:59 PM Response to Reply #72 |
141. Not only was it a 5-3, it wasn't the Liberals who handed anyone anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Brethren
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 04:38 PM Response to Reply #68 |
135. would like to know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Veronica.Franco
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
70. The little emperor has no clothes and no right to break the law ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nothing Without Hope
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
73. One more SCOTUS justice and all pretense of democracy and decency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
77. RW Meme of the day: Activist Judges, probably treason! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
80. Activist Judges! Activist Judges! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
young_at_heart
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
84. Alito showed his "stripes" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saigon68
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:51 AM Response to Reply #84 |
85. Alito is Scum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
86. As I read this there still can be military trials if Bush goes to congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flordehinojos
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
88. REMANDS DECISION TO THE LOWER COURTS? THIS IS NOT OVER YET. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 11:08 AM Response to Reply #88 |
93. No, that's not how it works. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flordehinojos
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 11:16 AM Response to Reply #93 |
95. my head is spinning and i am confused. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 11:19 AM Response to Reply #95 |
98. Don't be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flordehinojos
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 11:21 AM Response to Reply #98 |
99. okay, i'll take your word for it and join you in a toast against the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazzgirl
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 12:17 PM Response to Reply #98 |
107. I understood it Harvey. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 12:22 PM Response to Reply #107 |
109. That is basically it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
89. "Overstepped his authority" is an understatement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuffleClaw
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
90. bush has just said he's planning on IGNORING the court by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
91. Unfortunately, I Can See A Cloud Around This Silver Lining |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imalittleteapot
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
94. Wow. Just hearing the good news. Had Roberts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinfoilinfor2005
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
96. I wonder how Scalia and Thomas would have voted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jjrjsa
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
100. THE SUPREME COURT SIMPLY SAID... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 12:07 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. I don't think anyone was expecting Gitmo to be shut down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 12:17 PM Response to Reply #100 |
106. Are there many posters on this thread saying the rulinmg shuts down GITMO? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 12:19 PM Response to Reply #106 |
108. You're not supposed to notice his post count |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 12:28 PM Response to Reply #108 |
110. Who said anything about that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fluffdaddy
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 01:15 PM Response to Reply #110 |
115. These mole Freepers are getting out of hand in here. We may need |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissMillie
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 12:44 PM Response to Reply #100 |
112. Actually I think it more technically says |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
103. Supreme Court hates our freedom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katty
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
104. Great News! This IS a sea change!! It's a good day! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FighttheFuture
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 02:43 PM Response to Reply #104 |
122. Don't get too excited. It is not a "sea change". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Up2Late
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
111. Suck on that Fox "news"! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
117. Another 5:4 decision for Democracy! Congress must go Democratic! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 02:10 PM Response to Reply #117 |
119. Speaking of Congressional Dems--- where ARE they on this momentious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
120. So I guess they'll have to head for Romania |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FighttheFuture
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
123. So many are excited here… don’t be, it was predictable… |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 04:21 PM Response to Reply #123 |
129. I agree that bread-and-butter issues are more important than Gitmo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
130. Never fear.. Congress will make his Boo-Boo feel alllll better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goforit
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 04:27 PM Response to Reply #130 |
133. So true! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Brethren
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 07:26 PM Response to Reply #130 |
151. Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goforit
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
132. The whole entire world vs. 9 justices............ no choice!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Miss Chybil
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
134. Bush said there might still be a way to work with Congress to sanction... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
143. Wheels of justice slow,...but, sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Penndems
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
145. The SCOTUS got this one right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fountain79
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
146. Has any noticed that the courts did not outlaw tribunals... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
57_TomCat
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 08:56 PM Response to Reply #146 |
156. And there are other options as well such as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ready4Change
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
147. Not a minute too soon, 4 years too late. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reprobate
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
148. This is the most important idea of this decision: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anotherdrew
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
152. the bullshit newspaper The Oregonean called the trials "war crimes trials" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VirginiaDem
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
154. This is much better news than most here think... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Brethren
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 11:03 PM Response to Reply #154 |
161. what is your opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VirginiaDem
![]() |
Fri Jun-30-06 06:33 AM Response to Reply #161 |
166. I dunno... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Brethren
![]() |
Fri Jun-30-06 10:58 AM Response to Reply #166 |
173. I understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matilda
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
157. Rules for Treatment and Trial of POWs under Geneva Convention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Thu Jun-29-06 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
159. kicked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sofa king
![]() |
Fri Jun-30-06 12:45 AM Response to Original message |
165. Not stopped, just declared wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fountain79
![]() |
Fri Jun-30-06 07:34 AM Response to Original message |
168. just to play devil's advocate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman
![]() |
Fri Jun-30-06 07:46 AM Response to Original message |
169. actually stopped it, or saying it's illegal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26
![]() |
Fri Jun-30-06 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
172. Great! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ast_liberal2008
![]() |
Sun Jul-02-06 01:43 AM Response to Original message |
175. This totally illustrates how critical the current divisions in the SC are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 18th 2024, 03:38 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC