Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

Uncle Joe

(58,355 posts)
66. So what is your rebuttal to University of Oxford's Computational Propaganda Research Project
Sun Apr 21, 2019, 07:36 PM
Apr 2019

which the article was based on?



Philip N. Howard is a sociologist and communication researcher who studies the impact of information technologies on democracy and social inequality. He studies how new information technologies are used in both civic engagement and social control in countries around the world. He is Professor of Internet Studies at the Oxford Internet Institute and Balliol College at the University of Oxford.[1] He is the author of eight books, including New Media Campaigns and The Managed Citizen, The Digital Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, and Pax Technica: How the Internet of Things May Set Us Free or Lock Us Up.[2][3]

(snip)

Howard has been a Fellow at the Pew Internet & American Life Project in Washington D.C., the London School of Economics' Stanhope Centre for Communications Policy Research, Stanford University's Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, and Princeton University's Center for Information Technology Policy. In 2013 he moved to Budapest, Hungary where he helped to found the School of Public Policy at Central European University. He has courtesy appointments or fellowships with the Department of Communication at the University of Washington and the Center for Media, Data and Society at Central European University and Columbia University's Tow Center for Digital Journalism.

(snip)

Howard was one of the first to investigate the impact of digital media on political campaigning in advanced democracies, and he was the first political scientist to define and study "astroturf" political movements as the managed perception of grassroots support through astroturfing in his research on the Gore and Bush presidential campaigns. New Media Campaigns and the Managed Citizen (2005) is about how politicians and lobbyists in the United States use the internet to manipulate the public and violate privacy.[4] His research on technology and social change has been prescient. The subject's study of the 2016 U.S. presidential election did not identify the Russian sources of disinformation that other investigations have alluded to.[5]

(snip)

In 2014 he hypothesized that political elites in democracies would soon be using algorithms over social media to manipulate public opinion, a process he called "computational propaganda." His research on political redlining, astroturf campaigns and fake news inspired a decade of work and became particularly relevant during the Brexit referendum and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Campaign.[13][14] His research has exposed the global impact of bots and trolls on public opinion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_N._Howard


If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
The Nation endorsed Bernie Sanders Blinko Apr 2019 #1
The Nation is citing the studies from Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #3
If you like this spin, how about "Mueller obstructed his own investigation Hortensis Apr 2019 #22
How do you get "Mueller obstructed his own investigation?" Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #24
From "The Nation," of course. Some good stuff Hortensis Apr 2019 #27
Indictment: Russians also tried to help Bernie Sanders, Jill Stein presidential campaigns George II Apr 2019 #28
Stories like that are often suppressed or dismissed. We deserve to know the truth. NurseJackie Apr 2019 #29
Well, maybe the "pundits" are wrong, but I'm sure Robert Mueller III is 100% correct. George II Apr 2019 #45
I am equally certain of that. NurseJackie Apr 2019 #50
There's also this: George II Apr 2019 #48
+1 nt Skidmore Apr 2019 #4
P.S. This is your first day here, welcome to D.U. Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #5
Welcome to DU artislife Apr 2019 #25
So? I'm sure at one time you were a new member. This one joined about 10 months prior.... George II Apr 2019 #31
+++ sheshe2 Apr 2019 #35
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2019 #52
... SidDithers Apr 2019 #47
I'm more concerned about American Oligarchs like the Koch Brothers influencing our jalan48 Apr 2019 #2
It is best to be concerned about both. Big Blue Marble Apr 2019 #6
I'm sure the Koch Brothers prefer we focus on Russia which is what has been happening. This focus jalan48 Apr 2019 #8
We can do both. namahage Apr 2019 #13
It would be nice but focusing on a bogeyman outside of our society is much easier than focusing jalan48 Apr 2019 #14
It is our MO artislife Apr 2019 #26
Yep, and focusing on outside takes our attention off the inside. Imagine Rachel spending three hours jalan48 Apr 2019 #32
Woot woot artislife Apr 2019 #34
You don't think we should focus on a "bogeyman" who has been documented to have... George II Apr 2019 #36
Of course we should. However, the United States has interfered in other jalan48 Apr 2019 #39
Mueller found that Russia helped Bernie Sanders and targeted Hillary Clinton. stonecutter357 Apr 2019 #7
Do you see any statistics in the un-blacked version of Muller's Report that dispute Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #9
Just a reminder that the redacted portion of Mueller's report is ongoing criminal matters Indygram Apr 2019 #61
Which could be beneficial to Bernie, it was Barr that blacked it out. Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #64
What "Pundits"? It mentions 2 that I see. Also, although those percentages might seem low... PeeJ52 Apr 2019 #10
18% not 20 of Instagram and 7% of Facebook which brings us to content Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #15
This is from December 2018, before the Mueller report even came out... PeeJ52 Apr 2019 #18
I have always believed the Russians targeted susceptible individuals rzemanfl Apr 2019 #11
I used to love and trust The Nation, especially Katrina vanden Heuvel hlthe2b Apr 2019 #12
Are you aware of any studies, reports or investigations which dispute the findings Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #16
Indeed. THE CEO of NEW KNOWLEDGE was suspended for disseminating fake news by FACEBOOK hlthe2b Apr 2019 #19
That doesn't answer my question and I responded to your post# 17 Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #23
You ignore evidence of fraud from a key contributor. Do YOUR OWN research. hlthe2b Apr 2019 #30
No one disputes Russian meddling in the 2016 election but nothing in Mueller's report Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #38
My guess would be... sheshe2 Apr 2019 #37
What precisely in Mueller's report disputes the findings or statistics in the OP? Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #40
Yeah, them and Democracy Now! seem to be forming an alliance with Glenn Greenwald... PeeJ52 Apr 2019 #20
Well said Bradshaw3 Apr 2019 #41
This is why I stopped subscribing murielm99 Apr 2019 #43
+1 nt Skidmore Apr 2019 #57
Gee lookie what comes up from cited "NEW KNOWLEGE" who participated in these studies! hlthe2b Apr 2019 #17
This was from the election in Alabama in 2017 and Morgan states Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #21
Exactly.. Your research promoter fraudulently tried to press a pedophile into office. hlthe2b Apr 2019 #33
Does that not sound like to you that old excuse on "To Catch A Predator"? namahage Apr 2019 #44
So what is your rebuttal to University of Oxford's Computational Propaganda Research Project? Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #53
I'd say the issue is very difficult to study and though they have made attempt, their methodology hlthe2b Apr 2019 #55
It is the most valid study to date, Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #65
Taking a single unvalidated study of questionable methods as Gospel while ignoring Mueller/FBI hlthe2b Apr 2019 #68
Nothing in the OP contradicts the Mueller Report (at least what is visible) nor FBI/CIA findings. Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #70
Again, you refuse to accept the findings. See my last post. hlthe2b Apr 2019 #71
Present a link please. Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #72
If you can't find my last post to you sequentially numbered then I think I'm not able to assist you hlthe2b Apr 2019 #73
No one is ignoring the Mueller Report, CIA or FBI investigations, and you can't present Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #74
so they were working for Doug Jones against Roy Moore and trying to copy Russian Rethug models Celerity Apr 2019 #79
Your last proposition is my belief. hlthe2b Apr 2019 #80
This message was self-deleted by its author Celerity Apr 2019 #81
background on it, a large Democratic donor funded the company, but apparently knew nothing that they Celerity Apr 2019 #82
Does this analysis look at the US as a whole or does it analyze specific swing districts pnwmom Apr 2019 #42
Here is the full report. Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #54
Thank you. And the answer is they didn't focus on the swing states, and they included data pnwmom Apr 2019 #56
Here is a little more information regarding the swing states. Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #59
We know that in at least one of those states, the tallies didn't match up to the ballots pnwmom Apr 2019 #75
I will be the first to agree that our voting systems need major overhaul. Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #77
One turd in 17,000 gallons of water, is still, a turd in the pool... Mersky Apr 2019 #46
Hmm ismnotwasm Apr 2019 #49
k&r nt Skidmore Apr 2019 #58
Balogna. Triloon Apr 2019 #51
Gosh, I read all the way through.. stillcool Apr 2019 #60
Err... the cost to conversion ratio is why FB is worth $500 Bn Recursion Apr 2019 #62
The Nation's publisher is rusty fender Apr 2019 #63
So what is your rebuttal to University of Oxford's Computational Propaganda Research Project Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #66
Thank you. I didn't know that but I'd noticed the odd bias toward Russia long ago. n/t pnwmom Apr 2019 #76
You betcha! rusty fender Apr 2019 #83
Russia/Putin ratfucked us to death in 2016 rusty fender Apr 2019 #67
"Putinistas?" so everyone that doesn't follow along with the 21st century version of a red scare Uncle Joe Apr 2019 #69
I still wonder if the anti Wasserman-Schultz anointing of Hillary theme was amplified by Russia? Freethinker65 Apr 2019 #78
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»New Studies Show Pundits ...»Reply #66