Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Uncle Joe

(58,643 posts)
Thu Nov 14, 2019, 12:51 PM Nov 2019

MSNBC Is the Most Influential Network Among Liberals--And It's Ignoring Bernie Sanders [View all]



(snip)

Even so, MSNBC is positioned to have an outsized influence on the 2020 Democratic presidential primary. According to the Norman Lear Center, liberals watch MSNBC at (respectively) three and 10 times the rate of more moderate and conservative viewers. After Fox News, MSNBC is the most-watched cable news network, beating out CNN. What’s more, the median age of MSNBC’s audience is 65—and older voters turn out in high numbers in primary contests.

To understand how MSNBC may be shaping the 2020 election, In These Times analyzed the network’s August and September coverage of the Democratic presidential contest’s leading candidates—Sen. Bernie Sanders, former Vice President Joe Biden and Sen. Elizabeth Warren. We focused on the network’s flagship primetime shows: The 11th Hour with Brian Williams, All In with Chris Hayes, The Beat with Ari Melber, Hardball with Chris Matthews, The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell and The Rachel Maddow Show.

(snip)

Sanders and Warren released, respectively, eight and 10 detailed policy plans over this two-month period, covering topics from investing in rural America, empowering indigenous people, getting to 100% renewable energy and muzzling corporate lobbyists (Warren) to workplace democracy, a Green New Deal, housing for all and a wealth tax (Sanders). Most of these 18 plans were ignored by MSNBC, and only two were discussed in any depth: Hayes interviewed Sanders about his August 22 Green New Deal plan and Maddow interviewed Warren about her September 16 anti-corruption plan. (Biden, for his part, introduced zero plans.)

Instead, MSNBC’s coverage builds around incoming poll results, which may be cause for concern. Social scientists have long been critical of the way polls can shape news coverage, as poll coverage risks calcifying what might otherwise be fleeting shifts in popular opinion. The hosts In These Times analyzed occasionally acknowledged that polls are not always reliable, but relied on them anyway. Only Melber explicitly dismissed polls, saying “they don’t matter right now,” reporting instead on online donation numbers. He was alone in mentioning Sanders’ historic surge in small-dollar donations.

(snip)

http://inthesetimes.com/features/msnbc-bernie-sanders-coverage-democratic-primary-media-analysis.html

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Help help I'm being repressed. nycbos Nov 2019 #1
. BuffaloJackalope Nov 2019 #3
There's never a bad time for a little Python. There's a clip for every occasion! NurseJackie Nov 2019 #10
And that clip is so versatile. nycbos Nov 2019 #13
Brilliant. emmaverybo Nov 2019 #17
Omg ismnotwasm Nov 2019 #20
Too bad that Sanders is such an obscure candidate that nobody knows about him..... brooklynite Nov 2019 #2
Plus, the premise of that "In These Times" article is simply not true. I don't know what.... George II Nov 2019 #7
These were their metrics. Uncle Joe Nov 2019 #11
I thought Bernie supporters didn't like liberals... OldRed2450 Nov 2019 #24
Your bolded paragraph proves that their "analysis" is subjective at best. OilemFirchen Nov 2019 #31
The word stagnant is negative, one can report polls without commentary as to momentum or Uncle Joe Nov 2019 #32
The word "stagnant" is neutral. OilemFirchen Nov 2019 #34
Stagnant has negative connotations, it's not neutral. Uncle Joe Nov 2019 #36
Good lord. OilemFirchen Nov 2019 #41
Commentary by pundits, it's almost always about the "horse race" or trivial bullshit, Uncle Joe Nov 2019 #42
This is what everyone is overlooking, and it couldn't be more important. JudyM Nov 2019 #46
Perhaps they don't think he's electable ? Haggis for Breakfast Nov 2019 #45
Guess MSNBC needs another Big Ed Schultz. Hoyt Nov 2019 #4
RIP Big Ed. SCVDem Nov 2019 #6
Not really... comradebillyboy Nov 2019 #47
Not as long as they Chris Hayes. n/t Tarheel_Dem Nov 2019 #50
Maybe he could do another Fox town hall...nt SidDithers Nov 2019 #5
I'm sure that Wayne Messas has similar complaints Jose Garcia Nov 2019 #8
Mike Gravel Can't Believe His Polling Numbers Neck-And-Neck With Fucking Nobody Like Wayne Messam Celerity Nov 2019 #33
What no "GET OFF MY LAWN!!"? MustLoveBeagles Nov 2019 #44
We are each responsible to learn & decide OhNo-Really Nov 2019 #9
I am a liberal and I do not support Sanders, katmondoo Nov 2019 #12
Same here. The Valley Below Nov 2019 #15
Same here zeusdogmom Nov 2019 #26
My last choice too, even below Gabbard... comradebillyboy Nov 2019 #48
I thought we were all Center-Left now. Act_of_Reparation Nov 2019 #16
Same here Gothmog Nov 2019 #43
He gives the same speech over and over again. Happy Hoosier Nov 2019 #14
MSNBC is not liberal. Buzz cook Nov 2019 #18
Bingo. Nt Quixote1818 Nov 2019 #19
I totally agree with you Buzz cook, corporate is the keyword, this isn't the first time Uncle Joe Nov 2019 #22
msnbc is afterall just comcast with a different face questionseverything Nov 2019 #37
There is a consistency in your attempt to blame the media for Sanders' dismal performance. LanternWaste Nov 2019 #21
dismal performance? questionseverything Nov 2019 #38
he should drop out. that would get him attention. nt msongs Nov 2019 #23
You rock! NurseJackie Nov 2019 #29
Good idea!!!!!!! comradebillyboy Nov 2019 #49
Post removed Post removed Nov 2019 #25
... Skidmore Nov 2019 #27
good handmade34 Nov 2019 #28
While I avoid criticizing any of our primary candidates, I usually underthematrix Nov 2019 #30
Rats. I think you are right. mahina Nov 2019 #35
Oh gee. A few weeks ago we Biden supporters thought LakeArenal Nov 2019 #39
If you read the article, you would know the answers to your questions. n/t Uncle Joe Nov 2019 #40
I dropped cable in 2015. I haven't watched MSNBC since and I'm fine with it. CentralMass Nov 2019 #51
What a shady article. TidalWave46 Nov 2019 #52
LOL "outsized influence" on old people. Um, liberals aren't stupid. betsuni Nov 2019 #53
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»MSNBC Is the Most Influen...»Reply #0