Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Showing Original Post only (View all)WaPo: Hey, Michael Bloomberg, no one wants you to run for president [View all]
Hey, Michael Bloomberg, no one wants you to run for presidentOn Thursday, reporters learned that former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg is preparing to enter the Democratic primary. Scores of Democratic donors rejoiced at the news, and tens of families in the Hamptons erupted in cheers. In this era of increasing racial diversity, gender equality and rising populist anger, the Democratic primary clearly needed a septuagenarian white male billionaire to enter the race. Thank God Bloomberg is here to save the day!
Snark aside, Bloomberg 2020 is a bad idea. Polls suggest that Democrats neither want nor need a Bloomberg candidacy, and his strategy seems seriously flawed. Democratic donors have been sounding the alarm about their front-runners, but even if theyre right, Democrats already have better options than Bloomberg in the race.
Real-life, non-million-dollar-donor Democrats are happy with the candidates they already have. In July, Pew Research Center found that 65 percent of Democrats had a good or excellent impression of the candidates running for the Democratic nomination, 25 percent said their sense was that the field was fair, and only 5 percent had a poor impression.
By historical standards, those are excellent numbers. In 2015, only 51 percent had an unambiguously positive impression of the field, and in 2003 just 44 percent did. Democrats are about as happy with the field as they were in 2007, when Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and John Edwards were leading the Democratic primary and the party was on its way to a landslide victory. According to a Economist/YouGov poll, only 22 percent of registered Democrats who plan to vote in primaries wished they had more choices, and Pew found that 63 percent of Democrats are excited about several of the partys candidates.
Snark aside, Bloomberg 2020 is a bad idea. Polls suggest that Democrats neither want nor need a Bloomberg candidacy, and his strategy seems seriously flawed. Democratic donors have been sounding the alarm about their front-runners, but even if theyre right, Democrats already have better options than Bloomberg in the race.
Real-life, non-million-dollar-donor Democrats are happy with the candidates they already have. In July, Pew Research Center found that 65 percent of Democrats had a good or excellent impression of the candidates running for the Democratic nomination, 25 percent said their sense was that the field was fair, and only 5 percent had a poor impression.
By historical standards, those are excellent numbers. In 2015, only 51 percent had an unambiguously positive impression of the field, and in 2003 just 44 percent did. Democrats are about as happy with the field as they were in 2007, when Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and John Edwards were leading the Democratic primary and the party was on its way to a landslide victory. According to a Economist/YouGov poll, only 22 percent of registered Democrats who plan to vote in primaries wished they had more choices, and Pew found that 63 percent of Democrats are excited about several of the partys candidates.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/11/08/hey-michael-bloomberg-no-one-wants-you-run-president/
Democrats have an excellent field this time round. If Bloomberg want's to be useful, he can set up a super PAC to kick the shyte out of trump and the GOP, organize a voter registration drive, and flood Facebook.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
17 replies, 1533 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
17 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WaPo: Hey, Michael Bloomberg, no one wants you to run for president [View all]
crazytown
Nov 2019
OP
Before joining The Post, Byler was chief elections analyst and a staff writer at the Weekly Standard
progree
Nov 2019
#5
Most of these candidates are in the race for no reason other than their own vanity.
tritsofme
Nov 2019
#7
I will be curious to see if Bloomberg to get enough signatures in Alabama to get on the ballot.
TomSlick
Nov 2019
#12
Sounds to me Bloomberg is a candidate in waiting if Joe tanks in the early state voting
Otto Lidenbrock
Nov 2019
#14