Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

highplainsdem

(48,998 posts)
Thu Nov 7, 2019, 01:04 AM Nov 2019

Besides thinking Medicare for All can't be enacted. Hillary Clinton is opposed to a wealth tax [View all]

I've already posted another thread about what she said on MFA

https://www.democraticunderground.com/1287337993

since I'd seen the Axios article first, while scanning Twitter.

Then I found out, via a Fox News article and a tweet from a journalist, that HRC also made it clear at the same conference that she doesn't like the idea of a wealth tax.

That tweet




.@HillaryClinton on a wealth tax: “I just can’t understand how that could work... we used to have a wealth tax, it was called the estate tax, & I would be all in favor of reinstating that...” Says billionaires would have to sell assets to pay it, which would be too disruptive.




And from that Fox News article:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hillary-clinton-2020-dems-medicare-for-all-wealth-tax-disruptive


Clinton later was asked about the wealth tax that Warren has promoted. After admitting she didn't "know much" about the proposal, Clinton suggested it wasn't practical.

"I just don't understand how that could work, and I don't see other examples anywhere else in the world where it has actually worked over a long period of time," Clinton elaborated. "I would be all in favor of reinstating the estate tax because that is much more measurable. It is not as disruptive."

She went on, "If you were going to do a wealth tax and it was on assets... how you would value it is, I think, complicated to start with. But, assuming you can get some system of evaluation, people would literally have to sell assets to pay the tax on the assets that they owned before the wealth tax was levied. That would be incredibly disruptive, so I think there are other ways to raise the revenues."




Both Axios and the Fox News article have video of the full interview, over 40 minutes, but so far I haven't found any articles with short video clips of just what HRC said on MFA and the wealth tax.

Maybe Mediaite will have something like that later.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary knows and I'm happy she has chimed in Thekaspervote Nov 2019 #1
Thank you for this, hpd! Cha Nov 2019 #2
I don't like the "because"... she should support the Dem no matter WHO it is! thesquanderer Nov 2019 #15
Her assessment of the pitfalls of a wealth tax are shallow and eye-roll worthy. RockRaven Nov 2019 #3
Please don't put words in Hillary's mouth. Cha Nov 2019 #5
Where was that putting words in Hillary's mouth? thesquanderer Nov 2019 #16
Read the post again.. all the way to the bottom. Cha Nov 2019 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author BannonsLiver Nov 2019 #18
We were arguing the pros and cons of a wealth tax in 2016? (n/t) thesquanderer Nov 2019 #19
I'm sure it does.. I just caught the last Cha Nov 2019 #27
This tax is likely unconstitutional...and will never happen. Demsrule86 Nov 2019 #14
I agree, valuing does not have to be very complicated. thesquanderer Nov 2019 #17
Not when someone is about to dump $5 Billion to pay a tax bill. Hoyt Nov 2019 #29
"Obscenely Wealthy" The Mouth Nov 2019 #20
Hillary, Pelosi, Obama giving some worthwhile political insights. Hm. Maybe Dems should emmaverybo Nov 2019 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author trueblue2007 Nov 2019 #6
Calm down, please.. Cha Nov 2019 #7
do NOT tell me to CALM DOWN. you stop yapping and i'll be calmer. deal ?? trueblue2007 Nov 2019 #22
Wow.. you are so rude.. Cha Nov 2019 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author trueblue2007 Nov 2019 #32
lol Cha Nov 2019 #33
Oh, good grief. There were only 3 threads about HRC on the first page of this board (80 or so OPs) highplainsdem Nov 2019 #34
... Cha Nov 2019 #35
just gonna ignore both of you. I don't appreciate getting ganged up on by you trueblue2007 Nov 2019 #36
omg.. you replied to both us.. of course we're Cha Nov 2019 #37
Having supported and voted for HRC in the past, I see no reason to stop listening to her now when highplainsdem Nov 2019 #12
Thanks, hpd.. yes.. why is the poster being so "rude"? Cha Nov 2019 #24
Europe had quite a bit of experience with wealth taxation... TreasonousBastard Nov 2019 #8
Part of that failure was in the BlueMTexpat Nov 2019 #11
I LOVE Hillary! BlueMTexpat Nov 2019 #9
+1 pinkstarburst Nov 2019 #21
I love Hillary, too.. and will take her wise councel Cha Nov 2019 #25
Warren has a "Command of intricacies of finance?" Now that's an interesting claim. Hoyt Nov 2019 #30
Duplicate post. Sorry. Hoyt Nov 2019 #31
Hillary made an excellent point on whether we can even get a sound estimate of Blue_true Nov 2019 #39
It is possible. BlueMTexpat Nov 2019 #40
No, Hillary is NOT opposed to using taxation to correct Hortensis Nov 2019 #10
While the "Wealth Tax" Warren is putting forward is a bit foolish and will never happen.... TidalWave46 Nov 2019 #13
Hillary is correct as usual. NYMinute Nov 2019 #28
She makes a lot of excellent points. Blue_true Nov 2019 #38
Hillary Clinton: Warren's 'Medicare for All' plan would never get enacted Gothmog Nov 2019 #41
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Besides thinking Medicare...»Reply #0