Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

babylonsister

(171,066 posts)
Thu Sep 12, 2019, 08:21 AM Sep 2019

Warren Proposes the Biggest Expansion of Social Security in 50 Years [View all]


Warren Proposes the Biggest Expansion of Social Security in 50 Years
David Dayen
September 12, 2019
The plan, with an immediate $200 per month benefit increase, sets the left edge of the possible on a bedrock Democratic program.


In November 2013, less than a year into Elizabeth Warren’s first Senate term, she gave a floor speech rejecting a persistent push, including from her own party’s president, to cut Social Security benefits. Her outspokenness came out of studying the economy and noting the precarious finances of an aging population. “We don’t build a future for our children by cutting basic retirement benefits for their grandparents,” she argued. “With some modest adjustments, we can keep the system solvent for many more years, and could even increase benefits.”

At the time, a few other liberals—Senators Tom Harkin, Sherrod Brown, and Bernie Sanders—had endorsed expanding Social Security, an important protection for a working class struggling to retire with dignity. By joining the fight, Warren helped stave off the march to cuts. What was once the province of a few has become the dominant philosophy in the party. Earlier this year, a Social Security expansion package launched with the support of over 200 House Democrats. And now, Warren is charging ahead with the biggest expansion package a Democrat has proposed in decades.

“Despite the data staring us in the face, Congress hasn’t increased Social Security benefits in nearly fifty years,” Warren wrote today in her favorite format, a Medium post. “We need to get our priorities straight.”


She’s doing it because the struggles remain evident, and worse for those nearing retirement than those already in it. For too many people, particularly people of color, Social Security has become the main source of retirement income, as fewer employers offer significant retirement benefits and stagnant wages eat up savings. The median annual income of women over 65 in 2016 was a paltry $18,380. And that’s with many working into their golden years.

A Government Accountability Office report released just this week revealed that poorer seniors had a dramatically lower survival rate than their richer counterparts. Those living into their 70s and 80s tend to rely more on Social Security, but by paying in less throughout their working lives, they receive less in benefits than richer counterparts who need the money less. This inequality doom loop is built into the inputs and outputs of the Social Security system, and Warren seeks to arrest this yawning wealth gap that is literally a matter of life and death.

more...

https://prospect.org/article/warren-proposes-biggest-expansion-social-security-50-years
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There she goes with her plans again BeyondGeography Sep 2019 #1
yeah!! she doesnt fall for scrapping the cap! mopinko Sep 2019 #3
Completely agree. Nt lostnfound Sep 2019 #5
thanks for that insight rurallib Sep 2019 #9
i learned that from teddy kennedy. mopinko Sep 2019 #11
All well and good, but... Wounded Bear Sep 2019 #13
Not sure I follow you. The article says she would lift the cap KPN Sep 2019 #16
lift the cap, fine. scrap the cap, no. expand fica to investment income is the biggie. mopinko Sep 2019 #23
Thanks. I was thinking lifting and scrapping KPN Sep 2019 #36
Her plan is to lift the cap and tax investment income IronLionZion Sep 2019 #21
Thank you for that detailed and clear explanation. KPN Sep 2019 #37
Warren's plans are very well thought out. She's got my vote IronLionZion Sep 2019 #42
Social Security is not a "retirement benefit.". "Retirement" is nowhere in the law. MadDAsHell Sep 2019 #38
I love this Ohiogal Sep 2019 #2
Tax cuts serve 2 purposes Martin Eden Sep 2019 #8
well said. nt iluvtennis Sep 2019 #17
It's been their strategy for decades. And then they KPN Sep 2019 #19
F.U. Rob Portman ECL213 Sep 2019 #14
The difference between Warren and others who make proposals grantcart Sep 2019 #4
Why a wealth tax above $50 million? Make it a bloody $5 million. Get rid of the zero! DemocracyMouse Sep 2019 #7
Perhaps because if her wealth tax is annual, the 5 million would be gone in 50 years. KPN Sep 2019 #22
Oh dear, wouldn't Pragmatic Incrementalism be much safer? Fiendish Thingy Sep 2019 #6
Warren is educated. REALLY educated. DemocracyMouse Sep 2019 #10
She is going in the correct direction. safeinOhio Sep 2019 #12
At LEAST raise the cap. Rep Sean Duffy said he couldn't survive on $176,000 / year. usaf-vet Sep 2019 #15
Bingo....................the rich do not have to pay on anything above $132,900.01 turbinetree Sep 2019 #24
Warren's new proposal leaves a donut hole for income between $132,900 and $250,000 a year, highplainsdem Sep 2019 #30
I imagine doing so would result in fewer ayes. KPN Sep 2019 #35
K&R HeartlandProgressive Sep 2019 #18
Let it be her. zentrum Sep 2019 #20
I know senior women living on 900 per month with 15 dollars in Food Stamps this is Florida Oppaloopa Sep 2019 #25
While I sure can use the $200/month, I don't think this is a good idea -- except at lowest levels - Hoyt Sep 2019 #26
But this proposal entails new taxes, though with a strange donut hole for income between highplainsdem Sep 2019 #29
Nothing Warren can propose is going to satisfy you Hoyt. crazytown Sep 2019 #39
What evidence to the contrary? And last night, she was right back on her "Economic Patriotism." Hoyt Sep 2019 #40
'Free Trade' was not popular in the midwest in 2016 (and still is not, but they're learning) crazytown Sep 2019 #41
Definitely not popular. They consider foreign workers scabs -- "Screw poor Mexicans, Vietnamese, Hoyt Sep 2019 #43
What Warren calls 'Economic Patriotism', is not 'America First'. crazytown Sep 2019 #44
It's about dignity Johnny2X2X Sep 2019 #27
I'm not sure why we need to increase Social Security payments for those who are well off. And as highplainsdem Sep 2019 #28
Promises and proposals are easy, how to get them passed into law & paid for, much harder. n/t elocs Sep 2019 #31
Yeah Bradical79 Sep 2019 #32
Yea..... paleotn Sep 2019 #33
Did you set up that clever strawman just so you could knock it down? elocs Sep 2019 #34
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Warren Proposes the Bigge...»Reply #0