Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Showing Original Post only (View all)Warren Proposes the Biggest Expansion of Social Security in 50 Years [View all]
Warren Proposes the Biggest Expansion of Social Security in 50 Years
David Dayen
September 12, 2019
The plan, with an immediate $200 per month benefit increase, sets the left edge of the possible on a bedrock Democratic program.
In November 2013, less than a year into Elizabeth Warrens first Senate term, she gave a floor speech rejecting a persistent push, including from her own partys president, to cut Social Security benefits. Her outspokenness came out of studying the economy and noting the precarious finances of an aging population. We dont build a future for our children by cutting basic retirement benefits for their grandparents, she argued. With some modest adjustments, we can keep the system solvent for many more years, and could even increase benefits.
At the time, a few other liberalsSenators Tom Harkin, Sherrod Brown, and Bernie Sandershad endorsed expanding Social Security, an important protection for a working class struggling to retire with dignity. By joining the fight, Warren helped stave off the march to cuts. What was once the province of a few has become the dominant philosophy in the party. Earlier this year, a Social Security expansion package launched with the support of over 200 House Democrats. And now, Warren is charging ahead with the biggest expansion package a Democrat has proposed in decades.
Despite the data staring us in the face, Congress hasnt increased Social Security benefits in nearly fifty years, Warren wrote today in her favorite format, a Medium post. We need to get our priorities straight.
Shes doing it because the struggles remain evident, and worse for those nearing retirement than those already in it. For too many people, particularly people of color, Social Security has become the main source of retirement income, as fewer employers offer significant retirement benefits and stagnant wages eat up savings. The median annual income of women over 65 in 2016 was a paltry $18,380. And thats with many working into their golden years.
A Government Accountability Office report released just this week revealed that poorer seniors had a dramatically lower survival rate than their richer counterparts. Those living into their 70s and 80s tend to rely more on Social Security, but by paying in less throughout their working lives, they receive less in benefits than richer counterparts who need the money less. This inequality doom loop is built into the inputs and outputs of the Social Security system, and Warren seeks to arrest this yawning wealth gap that is literally a matter of life and death.
more...
https://prospect.org/article/warren-proposes-biggest-expansion-social-security-50-years
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
44 replies, 3178 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (59)
ReplyReply to this post
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Warren Proposes the Biggest Expansion of Social Security in 50 Years [View all]
babylonsister
Sep 2019
OP
lift the cap, fine. scrap the cap, no. expand fica to investment income is the biggie.
mopinko
Sep 2019
#23
Social Security is not a "retirement benefit.". "Retirement" is nowhere in the law.
MadDAsHell
Sep 2019
#38
Why a wealth tax above $50 million? Make it a bloody $5 million. Get rid of the zero!
DemocracyMouse
Sep 2019
#7
Perhaps because if her wealth tax is annual, the 5 million would be gone in 50 years.
KPN
Sep 2019
#22
At LEAST raise the cap. Rep Sean Duffy said he couldn't survive on $176,000 / year.
usaf-vet
Sep 2019
#15
Bingo....................the rich do not have to pay on anything above $132,900.01
turbinetree
Sep 2019
#24
Warren's new proposal leaves a donut hole for income between $132,900 and $250,000 a year,
highplainsdem
Sep 2019
#30
I know senior women living on 900 per month with 15 dollars in Food Stamps this is Florida
Oppaloopa
Sep 2019
#25
While I sure can use the $200/month, I don't think this is a good idea -- except at lowest levels -
Hoyt
Sep 2019
#26
But this proposal entails new taxes, though with a strange donut hole for income between
highplainsdem
Sep 2019
#29
What evidence to the contrary? And last night, she was right back on her "Economic Patriotism."
Hoyt
Sep 2019
#40
'Free Trade' was not popular in the midwest in 2016 (and still is not, but they're learning)
crazytown
Sep 2019
#41
Definitely not popular. They consider foreign workers scabs -- "Screw poor Mexicans, Vietnamese,
Hoyt
Sep 2019
#43
I'm not sure why we need to increase Social Security payments for those who are well off. And as
highplainsdem
Sep 2019
#28