Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Occupy Underground

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)

13. Yes, I've been surprised at the positive articles in Forbes.

Reply to Leopolds Ghost (Reply #9)

Tue Feb 28, 2012, 08:34 PM

Feb 2012

From the beginning there were some good articles on Forbes' website. Maybe they have been closer to the problems that caused the financial meltdown and understand the terrible impact it has had on ordinary people globally. Hard to ignore that, if you are an honest journalist.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

To occupy or not to occupy, that is the question [View all] starroute Feb 2012 OP

We are the 99% Kalidurga Feb 2012 #1

Occupy the ballot box. n/t jaysunb Feb 2012 #2

Interesting to see this kind of a comment here in the Occupy forum - TBF Feb 2012 #4

The corporations have power because we give them power. ellisonz Feb 2012 #11

If you'll re-read it you'll notice that I didn't advocate not voting - TBF Feb 2012 #12

K&R JDPriestly Feb 2012 #3

"Occupy" didn't just appear out of thin air, TBF Feb 2012 #5

For me, Occupy's reclamation of the "village square" as a commons for the people to CONNECT snot Feb 2012 #6

Good Points. KoKo Feb 2012 #8

BINGO unionworks Feb 2012 #10

Here's one more relevant point -- about caring for the homeless starroute Feb 2012 #7

Yes, and strangely enough, Forbes.com is the ones who first got it right. Leopolds Ghost Feb 2012 #9

Yes, I've been surprised at the positive articles in Forbes. sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #13