Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Is it now abundantly clear why DWS and Hillary want to limit exposure to voters? [View all]FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)3. that's how they roll n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
151 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Is it now abundantly clear why DWS and Hillary want to limit exposure to voters? [View all]
FlatBaroque
Nov 2015
OP
IMO, you guys are completely missing the big picture. You bet the dNC management
Hortensis
Nov 2015
#107
Right-wing conspiracy crap has no place on a Democratic Party supporting site.
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#12
I'm sure you will defend Bernie just as much when Hillary drops out.....
Spitfire of ATJ
Nov 2015
#51
Not defending anything. Just bringing clarity to an attempt to confuse in an attempt to
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#69
What makes you think he won't? We're still in the primaries. The CPD, of which he's an
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#76
I believe I was clear in my initial post and the follow-up what I'm stating,
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#62
Hmmm, didn't I just see a Hillary supporter using Frank Luntz as a source? nt
Live and Learn
Nov 2015
#61
So? Was it an article written by a Ron Paul supporter, sourced from notorious RW-propaganda sites?
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#64
Another opinion of yours - not backed by any evidence other than YOUR inability to
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#94
What I really don't understand is how your post makes any sense at all. nt
Live and Learn
Nov 2015
#110
For This One - Neocons Pushed Iraq Invasion - HRC Voted YES On IWR - HRC Bears Responsibility
cantbeserious
Nov 2015
#4
"HRC is not redeemable from this perspective in this one's eyes." Not surprising.
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#15
Why? After years of excoriating President Obama, you'll reward Sanders and support him?
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#42
Why? Hit the minus box in the upper left corner. Click on the New Democrat's texts below.
DhhD
Nov 2015
#73
I understand YOUR reason - Pres. Obama is not left enough. But for a self-identified "Obama-mama"
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#75
Except: Please look at and analyze the 2008 Campaign promises. Supporting Obama now as a New Democ
DhhD
Nov 2015
#82
I'm sorry, but when you toss the word "third way" into a discussion, my eyes roll up
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#89
Thank you for asking me in today. Social Security Reform is on the, third way, reform list. Let us
DhhD
Nov 2015
#98
You're discussing domestic policy. Domestic policy is NOT under the constitutional powers of the
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#101
Lets hear from Hillary Clinton on that in the next Debate. I hope that nothing happens to
DhhD
Nov 2015
#102
President Obama kept his promises where he was able to. Anyone who says he didn't, isn't
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#149
You answered me with this numbered lesson, as if I was putting down the President. I was not!
bkkyosemite
Nov 2015
#150
I apologize if that's how my post came across. I know you weren't putting President Obama down.
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#151
Oh, I knew in what context he spoke those words - on various shows, including Ed Schultz'.
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#91
Limit exposure? Reminder! The DNC only held six debates for the 2004 and 2008 presidential election!
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#8
As a dispassionate observer I must give this round to BlueCaliDemocrat .
DemocratSinceBirth
Nov 2015
#11
If you don't believe DSB is an honest broker there is nothing I can do to disabuse you of that ...
DemocratSinceBirth
Nov 2015
#125
Fair. You can criticize DWS for that new rule, but let's be honest here...Sanders is getting MORE
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#36
You know as well as I that that's not true. It's all about Sanders and his electability.
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#47
I would have thought that Bernie preferred his 10,000+ rallys for messaging
Sheepshank
Nov 2015
#127
I wish they'd bring Howard Dean back as chair of the DNC. DWS has been a disaster
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#97
Can't decide:did Bernie's awesome performance kick Hillary's ass, or did she do that all by herself?
AzDar
Nov 2015
#16
Yes I caught that and had already seen the contributor post before. She lied.
bkkyosemite
Nov 2015
#35
Yeah, that 9/11 Wall Street gaffe was really, really bad. It's going to haunt her the rest of
askew
Nov 2015
#44
"After dodging sniper fire to save Wall Street from 9/11, I gave the order to kill bin Laden."
whereisjustice
Nov 2015
#46
They both answer to the billionaires. Vote with the People and not the billionaires. nm
rhett o rick
Nov 2015
#115
I know, right? Sanders once again revealed himself to be a one-issue candidate.
Metric System
Nov 2015
#129
And thanks to Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders is enjoying that exposure, too.
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#141
Yes, she does. That's why all this griping about "not enough debates!!" is so confusing.
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#143