Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
13. A "Truman Democrat"?
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 04:28 PM
Aug 2012

Here's some Truman quotes:

Given the choice between a Republican and someone who acts like a Republican, people will vote for the real Republican all the time.

Men make history and not the other way around. In periods where there is no leadership, society stands still. Progress occurs when courageous, skillful leaders seize the opportunity to change things for the better.

Carry the battle to them. Don't let them bring it to you. Put them on the defensive ...

Republicans approve of the American farmer, but they are willing to help him go broke. They stand four-square for the American home--but not for housing. They are strong for labor--but they are stronger for restricting labor's rights. They favor minimum wage--the smaller the minimum wage the better. They endorse educational opportunity for all--but they won't spend money for teachers or for schools. They think modern medical care and hospitals are fine--for people who can afford them. They consider electrical power a great blessing--but only when the private power companies get their rake-off. They think American standard of living is a fine thing--so long as it doesn't spread to all the people. And they admire of Government of the United States so much that they would like to buy it.

Whenever a fellow tells me he's bipartisan, I know he's going to vote against me.

He's an "Eisenhower Democrat"? AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2012 #1
if that speech is the yardstick, then ike wasn't an eisenhower republican. unblock Aug 2012 #6
Truman Democrat might be the more conventional historical label leveymg Aug 2012 #7
A "Truman Democrat"? AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2012 #13
hmmm...I think a "Clinton Democrat" might be closer to the mark. limpyhobbler Aug 2012 #15
A "Clinton Democrat"? AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2012 #19
I almost said exactly what you said limpyhobbler Aug 2012 #20
I agree. Both Clintons and Obama are centrists, despite what the MSM says... Rhiannon12866 Aug 2012 #25
Sorry, I forgot to include the link to the article BrainGlutton23 Aug 2012 #8
No, the contrast could not be more stark frazzled Aug 2012 #2
What frazzled said. greatauntoftriplets Aug 2012 #3
+1 treestar Aug 2012 #9
If he is a "Eisenhower Dem" then there are big differnces between the parties WI_DEM Aug 2012 #4
The "big difference" is between the GOP in the 1950s and the GOP today. BrainGlutton23 Aug 2012 #10
I would agree that Obama has governed like an Eisenhower Democrat, probably Blue Meany Aug 2012 #5
The GOP are "Taliban Republicans", so the difference is VERY VERY stark scheming daemons Aug 2012 #11
Oh, FFS, Obama is a center-rightist and Romney is an out-and-out fascist. Whenever coalition_unwilling Aug 2012 #12
Yes. nt bananas Aug 2012 #26
Barack Obama is an Obama Democrat. NYC Liberal Aug 2012 #14
Exactly NYC Liberal.. Cha Aug 2012 #17
Here is the problem DonCoquixote Aug 2012 #16
I guess they're comparable in the sense both are a product of their time... Drunken Irishman Aug 2012 #18
Absolutely, completely, 100% wrong. Zoeisright Aug 2012 #21
I can save that writer some time. President Obama is a MODERATE, just like me. progressivebydesign Aug 2012 #22
This looks wrong. Jack Sprat Aug 2012 #23
The author seems depressed that this election won't be about ideas. Jennicut Aug 2012 #24
Accurate MFrohike Aug 2012 #27
Isn't that enough? Kalidurga Aug 2012 #28
He's a good writer MFrohike Aug 2012 #30
It cannot be stressed too much that the parties of today are not the parties of the 50's. Agnosticsherbet Aug 2012 #29
Well you did get 1 rec. grantcart Aug 2012 #31
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Obama is an "Eisenho...»Reply #13