Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Do you believe in a 50-State Strategy? [View all]rocktivity
(44,577 posts)33. I have two words for the 50-state strategy: it works.
Last edited Mon Feb 6, 2012, 04:52 PM - Edit history (7)
Because it works even when it DOESN'T work.
In 2008, McCain won Montana by less than 3 points, and Missouri by less than one. Those states are now in a position to be "flipped" this year because of the groundwork Dean laid in 2006. 50SS doesn't always produce instant results, but the small investments we make in building up blue bases now can certainly pay off in the future.
The only complaining about 50SS that I hear comes from fatcat political consultants who are no longer collecting six- and seven-figure fees from the DNC and the candidates.
rocktivity
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No, I don't believe in it because it wastes money. Lying and saying you're going to try
dimbear
Jan 2012
#1
The only impediment to that is redistricting schemes that the Repukes have
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jan 2012
#25
Not if we want a more progressive majority. A 50-state stategy means that we will
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jan 2012
#23
Given the screwed up nature of apportionment, a 50 State strategy can't work.
joshcryer
Feb 2012
#37