Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Utopian Leftist

(534 posts)
203. What works for CONS (I.E. whatever they can get away with)
Sat Oct 24, 2015, 04:12 PM
Oct 2015

does not always work for those of us on the sane side of the aisle.

It is not unlike what the conservatives accomplished in the Republican Party during the 1960s and 1970s.

That's because they were wrong to begin with. On every issue. So CONS, having nothing to fear but the truth, pulled a CON on themselves and their own party, and shifted ever more belligerently to the right. The Clintons apparently believed they could do the same thing to the Democratic Party: pull a con-job, presenting themselves as liberals when in fact they are far from it.

I think we're all about to find out just how wrong they were to underestimate the passion those of us who are truly on the left, feel for our beliefs. Americans want their left, left and their right, right. Watering down of either position is not the same thing as compromise. Compromise only works to an extent: when one reaches the extent of compromising his/her principles, it's over. Compromised principles lead to watered-down ideas that are never effective. It's become blatantly obvious this week that Tony Blair had no principles, to begin with. He helped Shrub and Powell plan the Iraq War a year before it was sold to Murkastan.

Can the same be said for either Clinton? Only time will tell. But if they truly believe the way forward is to water down RepubliCON economic proposals, then why do they not stand up and admit this truth? Why pretend to be liberals, besides a raw desire to win elections? We must end this silliness now. Politics is not a sport. It's nobody's TURN to be President! There are lives at stake, potentially millions here in this once-in-a-lifetime election.
Thanks MohRokTah Oct 2015 #1
Glad you found your way. madfloridian Oct 2015 #2
It's the best way MohRokTah Oct 2015 #4
the present tk2kewl Oct 2015 #14
Space. eom MohRokTah Oct 2015 #20
Go for it, why wait? The rest of us will have more air and water after you leave. dreamnightwind Oct 2015 #49
Here you go... Purveyor Oct 2015 #58
Just like in Elysium? BeanMusical Oct 2015 #115
*** Squirrel !!! *** cprise Oct 2015 #205
Clinton is rejecting capitalism by refusing to break up banks cprise Oct 2015 #21
I love yr comment about her policies being like getting 20 bucks off of truedelphi Oct 2015 #35
Bravo, in a nutshell & well said! nt mother earth Oct 2015 #66
Thank you Ronald Reagan for your astute analysis Armstead Oct 2015 #23
:) Phlem Oct 2015 #61
Europe's Democratic Socialists are failures? That Guy 888 Oct 2015 #24
That's where they're going with the red baiting. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #63
It has already begun: arcane1 Oct 2015 #69
Oh noes! BERNIE'S GONNA TAKE MY LEMONADE STAND!!1! beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #70
Government-run lemonade stands that all look like Soviet apartment blocks arcane1 Oct 2015 #73
LOL! beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #79
:facepalm: BeanMusical Oct 2015 #125
There's a difference between saying what Sanders himself says he is, i.e., "socialist"..... George II Oct 2015 #174
Canuks did Not Live Through the Era of McCarthy McKim Oct 2015 #183
Some people's understanding, such as the author of that thread, of socialism ... Fantastic Anarchist Oct 2015 #175
Communism-What is their military looking like? No Red Army? DhhD Oct 2015 #81
History proved that the New Deal was a resounding success n/t eridani Oct 2015 #180
I guess FDR and a middle class with the highest standard of living the world has ever known... raindaddy Oct 2015 #187
The game Monopoly proves Capitalism is an abysmal failure for all but one lone winner. Live and Learn Oct 2015 #188
I still support Sanders and oppose Hillary more than I did before this OP was posted. Autumn Oct 2015 #41
Why does this scenario come to mind? passiveporcupine Oct 2015 #52
You support Hillary? NO! BuelahWitch Oct 2015 #103
The only conclusion is that you support the leadership of corporations and their puppets and rhett o rick Oct 2015 #130
As I stated previously, anyone that doesn't support Sanders is voting for selfish reasons. Live and Learn Oct 2015 #189
Is Bill Clinton in the primaries? upaloopa Oct 2015 #3
Hillary Clinton was a member of the DLC riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #7
Still not about the primaries upaloopa Oct 2015 #11
So you don't think a candidates past history is relevant? riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #13
C'mon now. Not when it makes them look bad. Phlem Oct 2015 #56
Have you attempted to post any discussion in any forums lately? truedelphi Oct 2015 #37
They hearings yesterday were not about the primaries. Did you complain about those OPs? Autumn Oct 2015 #42
Make up your damned minds - TBF Oct 2015 #96
Obama was NEVER a member of the DLC. eom MohRokTah Oct 2015 #22
He self identifies as a "New Democrat" which is a DLC identifier riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #27
Same here. truedelphi Oct 2015 #40
Nothing in your link about him being in the DLC. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #85
Lol! Parse away... riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #90
The only parsing being done is by anybody who would say Obama was a member of the DLC. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #91
Lol!!! Oh I read it. Good luck with that... riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #102
Thanks for revealing just how much of an extremist you are. eom MohRokTah Oct 2015 #107
The irony! BeanMusical Oct 2015 #126
The heart break and reductio ad absurdum of Identity politics Fairgo Oct 2015 #152
Nope. Obama is a distinction without a difference riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #132
More extremism MohRokTah Oct 2015 #134
"radical leftist extremists" ? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #135
By their words they shall be known. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #136
Oh the extremist in this thread has made themselves known, all right. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #137
You would certainly know. eom MohRokTah Oct 2015 #139
Yep, I can spot right wing rhetoric a mile away. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #141
I can spot left wing extremism miles away and fortunately it has no effect outside internet forums. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #147
Conservative Dems: Words mean what we want them to mean on DU! beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #148
There is no such thing as "Conservative Dems". MohRokTah Oct 2015 #149
ahem: beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #150
Internet myth. There are no Conservative Democrats MohRokTah Oct 2015 #154
Just because you don't like the label doesn't mean it's a myth. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #155
Parse all you like MohRokTah Oct 2015 #156
Parse = proved Conservative Democrats aren't a myth? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #157
No proof whatsoever, just leftist extremist BS. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #158
bluedogdems.com is "leftist extremist BS"? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #160
Keep digging. BeanMusical Oct 2015 #165
There is no such thing as "Global Warming"! BeanMusical Oct 2015 #162
LMAO! beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #163
Lol! BeanMusical Oct 2015 #164
I'm convinced that you are really great at satire or really awful at trolling. Fantastic Anarchist Oct 2015 #178
What exactly is a "radical leftist extremist?" blackspade Oct 2015 #206
Shame on those radical leftist extremists for bring us the 8-hour workday, labor laws, ... Fantastic Anarchist Oct 2015 #177
Actually, there are millions of sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #186
How dare he/she disagree with you! Fantastic Anarchist Oct 2015 #176
Unknown to him he was listed as a member, and as soon as he found out... George II Oct 2015 #172
He's DLC - there are really better things to discuss TBF Oct 2015 #182
There are a lot of political myths that are accepted as gospel by the majority of people here YoungDemCA Oct 2015 #194
It's weird. I wonder how many people here are really Birthers, too. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #202
His own words: madfloridian Oct 2015 #28
Sweet link. Phlem Oct 2015 #62
Nothing in your link about him being in the DLC. He was NEVER a member of the DLC. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #88
New Democrats rose from the DLC. Don't accuse me of falsehoods and innuendo. madfloridian Oct 2015 #123
Here's a link to help you. madfloridian Oct 2015 #124
Yet another link without anything about Obama being in the DLC. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #128
Being so obtuse is not a virtue, you do realize this, right? Fantastic Anarchist Oct 2015 #179
The ideologies of both Clintons parallel very closely with that of the old DLC and new Third Way. rhett o rick Oct 2015 #192
His own words: George II Oct 2015 #138
.... Phlem Oct 2015 #60
Nothing there about Obama being in the DLC. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #84
Of Course. Phlem Oct 2015 #170
If Sanders ever joined the Democratic Party... George II Oct 2015 #32
Or he could have stayed an Independent while voting for neverforget Oct 2015 #39
Like he did yesterday when he voted against a Dianne Feinstein amendment and... George II Oct 2015 #55
You mean when he stood with 12 Democrats to protect our privacy rights? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #57
He voted WITH Rand Paul and against the majority of Democrats. George II Oct 2015 #67
He stood with these 12 Democrats, not with Rand Paul: beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #68
All I know is that he voted with a Republican Presidential candidate and voted against.... George II Oct 2015 #71
12 Dems, and 1 republican = voting with the republican? arcane1 Oct 2015 #74
So you're hinting that he did NOT vote with someone who could be his opponent next November..... George II Oct 2015 #77
How many republican candidates in 2007 and 2015 voted for, or endorsed, the Iraq war? arcane1 Oct 2015 #80
He voted to protect our privacy rights, and so did Elizabeth Warren. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #76
When Sanders entered the Democratic Presidential race one the rationales both he and his followers.. George II Oct 2015 #116
Really? Do you have a link to where we said he "always votes with the Democratic caucus"? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #117
I don't know why Warren voted against the amendment, all I know is that a Democratic... George II Oct 2015 #119
You would rather have him vote against our interests just to oppose Rand Paul? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #120
Apparently he opposed about three quarters of the Democrats in the Senate, too. George II Oct 2015 #121
Because of privacy rights - good! You didn't answer my question, why do you support the bill? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #122
Here are the other Dems who voted the same way madfloridian Oct 2015 #98
12 Democrats voted against it (27%), 32 Democrats voted for it (72%) George II Oct 2015 #118
The only people i would consider Spirochete Oct 2015 #151
And 50 Republicans voted for it. Which means he voted against 98% of the Republicans voting. RichVRichV Oct 2015 #171
So the majority of the Democratic caucus voted with the GOP. blackspade Oct 2015 #207
No it isn't, you missed my point - Sanders and his followers like to throw out the concept.... George II Oct 2015 #211
You never did say, George, why do you support the bill? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #212
Who specifically makes that arguement? blackspade Oct 2015 #227
"All I know is that he voted with a Republican yada yada" BeanMusical Oct 2015 #131
Not a just a "republican yada yada", but a republican who may be running against Hillary Clinton.... George II Oct 2015 #210
And a Democratic woman who will hopefully be Bernie's VP! beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #214
Yes, he should but he's not. That's very intriguing. BeanMusical Oct 2015 #215
Isn't it? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #217
Great, now I have Seinfeld's theme song as an earworm. BeanMusical Oct 2015 #221
Quick, listen to this George: beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #222
Thanks, far better earworm. BeanMusical Oct 2015 #224
Who's obsessed with Paul? I just find it very disappointing that a person who is running.... George II Oct 2015 #216
You're disappointed that Senators Sanders and Warren are concerned with privacy rights? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #218
Huh? George II Oct 2015 #219
If you fault Bernie because he "stood" with a Republican you have to fault Hillary for doing it too. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #220
Don't you love it when they leave crucial information OUT BuelahWitch Oct 2015 #153
It's the only way to make the memes work. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #159
Please explain why you think the vote was wrong. TheKentuckian Oct 2015 #113
So you are saying Bill and Hillary became DLCers to gain something for themselves? Autumn Oct 2015 #46
I didn't say anything like that. Sanders isn't a "politician", he's an opportunist. George II Oct 2015 #50
In what way is he an "opportunist"? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #59
ALL politicians are opportunists. Volaris Oct 2015 #72
George words do have meaning even if you don't want them to. Autumn Oct 2015 #75
Words mean whatever some Hillary supporters want them to mean: beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #83
I'm actually still chuckling at "Third Way Progressives" riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #92
Me too! But I'm not touching that with a ten foot pole. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #94
Oh me neither. riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #99
It's good for amusement but little else. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #101
Pretty soon it will be Bernie hates Obama! riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #105
They've been using that talking point for months, it's part of the 'Bernie is a racist' meme. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #106
That pathetic attempt at a meme hifiguy Oct 2015 #213
Funny isn't it. My favorite all time poster was the one complaining about rec circles Autumn Oct 2015 #110
You mean Big Rec™ ? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #111
I had no clue he had been trade marked LOL Autumn Oct 2015 #112
That was courtesy of Capt. Obvious! beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #114
That depends on what the definition of 'IS' is. n/t Utopian Leftist Oct 2015 #204
What? Are you really asking if Bill Clinton is in the primaries? rhett o rick Oct 2015 #190
Thanks mad. No matter which candidate one supports, your OPs are always 1st rate riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #5
Just saying is all portlander23 Oct 2015 #6
Good post. Their attacks on the social safety nets is to me a dangerous thing. madfloridian Oct 2015 #8
Great post. Very informative. Thank you. liberal_at_heart Oct 2015 #173
Yep. That's when the Democratic party started abandoning what was traditionally liberal_at_heart Oct 2015 #9
Yes, they "switched loyalties." madfloridian Oct 2015 #15
The New Democrats were very apparent with a new 1998 law to privatize most of the U.S. DhhD Oct 2015 #95
Ah, thanks for that link. madfloridian Oct 2015 #97
"traditionally Democratic values" YoungDemCA Oct 2015 #195
And Third Way site has the info you need about TPP.... madfloridian Oct 2015 #10
Oh Goodie! To think that once again, truedelphi Oct 2015 #44
AND that new trade policy is going through no matter what. madfloridian Oct 2015 #161
K&R CharlotteVale Oct 2015 #12
Is there any lasting, positive testimony of Thirdwayer's contributions to society? Baitball Blogger Oct 2015 #16
They have had plenty of time to prove their way works and have failed. liberal_at_heart Oct 2015 #17
Obviously, there are people who don't realize that fact. Baitball Blogger Oct 2015 #26
K&R FloriTexan Oct 2015 #18
..... madfloridian Oct 2015 #19
Here is one from me. moabfan Oct 2015 #48
Before Clinton, Democrats couldn't gain the WH for 20+ years. JaneyVee Oct 2015 #25
Are you saying that artislife Oct 2015 #29
I think the choice to speak in "years" rather than "terms" is very telling HereSince1628 Oct 2015 #36
He only got in via a third party spoiler by the name moabfan Oct 2015 #53
That's a right wing myth. All evidence points to the contrary. wyldwolf Oct 2015 #78
What I've learned on DU is that some people would rather support gadfly, losing candidates YoungDemCA Oct 2015 #196
Um, it was 16 years between Carter and Clinton.... blackspade Oct 2015 #208
Excellent, thoughtful OP on the FACTS of this reprehensible Think Tank the represents the interests sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #30
"avoid economic populism at all costs" DirkGently Oct 2015 #31
Yeah, but she did once march down there and she told them, cut it out, guys! TwilightGardener Oct 2015 #33
we have yet to see the 401(k) bubble burst but it will. liberal_at_heart Oct 2015 #34
One day shenmue Oct 2015 #38
"shadowy libertarian accusations"???? madfloridian Oct 2015 #45
It's just weird.... haikugal Oct 2015 #142
Can't believe someone thinks I'm libertarian in any way. madfloridian Oct 2015 #143
Yeah.. haikugal Oct 2015 #145
I had already decided - no vote from me for any DLC, DINO, New Democrat Coalition, any politician djean111 Oct 2015 #43
The group's willingness to sacrifice Social Security and other social safety nets... madfloridian Oct 2015 #47
Shkreli Democrats MisterP Oct 2015 #51
Kicked and recommended to the Max! Enthusiast Oct 2015 #54
Thanks. I just wish that the supporters of the conservative democratic candidate would Doctor_J Oct 2015 #64
K & R, explains a lot & makes perfect sense, it's all part of the oligarchy stranglehold mother earth Oct 2015 #65
No more Turd Way! Dont call me Shirley Oct 2015 #82
Third Way? No way? Corporatists davemac Oct 2015 #86
K & R azmom Oct 2015 #87
Neolibs of the world unite! You have nothing to lose but your principles! Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2015 #89
I saw folks trying to re-write history on DU today - TBF Oct 2015 #93
Thanks MadFloridian... Long But Concise & Clear! All I Have ChiciB1 Oct 2015 #100
More from Guardian 2005 Third Way Away Day madfloridian Oct 2015 #104
Others in 2005 were against Hillary Clinton being in the Senate. Blair's emails were known then. DhhD Oct 2015 #184
K & R historylovr Oct 2015 #108
Follow the money ;) Babel_17 Oct 2015 #109
HRC Is A Pawn Of the Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks That Pay For Her Campaign cantbeserious Oct 2015 #127
Kick and R BeanMusical Oct 2015 #129
'Bill' Clinton bigtree Oct 2015 #133
Except of course HRC actually was a DLC member riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #140
that tells me very little about her positions and record bigtree Oct 2015 #144
The DLC has/had very public positions on the issues riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #146
I don't need google bigtree Oct 2015 #181
No, it's misleading to try to separate Hillary from the DLC. DirkGently Oct 2015 #198
I agree Dem2 Oct 2015 #168
I see this discussion as about The DLC and/or The Third Way's influence on the Democratic rhett o rick Oct 2015 #191
more progressive than thou politics? bigtree Oct 2015 #225
Why don't you turn your questions into statements? nm rhett o rick Oct 2015 #228
Nice research Dem2 Oct 2015 #166
Also linked to Social Democracy via Anthony Giddens it seems: ucrdem Oct 2015 #167
If you like the third way you'll just love Hillary's presidency. Bernblu Oct 2015 #169
The legendary Tony Benn used to keep a tea mug in his office that read: forest444 Oct 2015 #185
great post Locrian Oct 2015 #193
K & R AzDar Oct 2015 #197
Thank you emsimon33 Oct 2015 #199
No more Clinton. SoapBox Oct 2015 #200
A kinder, gentler republiconism noiretextatique Oct 2015 #201
What works for CONS (I.E. whatever they can get away with) Utopian Leftist Oct 2015 #203
The essence of Third Way hifiguy Oct 2015 #209
How the Democratic Party Lost its Soul antigop Oct 2015 #223
After NAFTA 13 million new jobs were created, industrial grew 3x fasrer then the 2 previous decades BlueStateLib Oct 2015 #226
Now they say goal should be to have businesses hire all around the world. madfloridian Oct 2015 #229
Democrats were tired of losing the Presidency Recursion Oct 2015 #230
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Let's talk Third Way. Som...»Reply #203