Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Thanks MohRokTah Oct 2015 #1
Glad you found your way. madfloridian Oct 2015 #2
It's the best way MohRokTah Oct 2015 #4
the present tk2kewl Oct 2015 #14
Space. eom MohRokTah Oct 2015 #20
Go for it, why wait? The rest of us will have more air and water after you leave. dreamnightwind Oct 2015 #49
Here you go... Purveyor Oct 2015 #58
Just like in Elysium? BeanMusical Oct 2015 #115
*** Squirrel !!! *** cprise Oct 2015 #205
Clinton is rejecting capitalism by refusing to break up banks cprise Oct 2015 #21
I love yr comment about her policies being like getting 20 bucks off of truedelphi Oct 2015 #35
Bravo, in a nutshell & well said! nt mother earth Oct 2015 #66
Thank you Ronald Reagan for your astute analysis Armstead Oct 2015 #23
:) Phlem Oct 2015 #61
Europe's Democratic Socialists are failures? That Guy 888 Oct 2015 #24
That's where they're going with the red baiting. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #63
It has already begun: arcane1 Oct 2015 #69
Oh noes! BERNIE'S GONNA TAKE MY LEMONADE STAND!!1! beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #70
Government-run lemonade stands that all look like Soviet apartment blocks arcane1 Oct 2015 #73
LOL! beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #79
:facepalm: BeanMusical Oct 2015 #125
There's a difference between saying what Sanders himself says he is, i.e., "socialist"..... George II Oct 2015 #174
Canuks did Not Live Through the Era of McCarthy McKim Oct 2015 #183
Some people's understanding, such as the author of that thread, of socialism ... Fantastic Anarchist Oct 2015 #175
Communism-What is their military looking like? No Red Army? DhhD Oct 2015 #81
History proved that the New Deal was a resounding success n/t eridani Oct 2015 #180
I guess FDR and a middle class with the highest standard of living the world has ever known... raindaddy Oct 2015 #187
The game Monopoly proves Capitalism is an abysmal failure for all but one lone winner. Live and Learn Oct 2015 #188
I still support Sanders and oppose Hillary more than I did before this OP was posted. Autumn Oct 2015 #41
Why does this scenario come to mind? passiveporcupine Oct 2015 #52
You support Hillary? NO! BuelahWitch Oct 2015 #103
The only conclusion is that you support the leadership of corporations and their puppets and rhett o rick Oct 2015 #130
As I stated previously, anyone that doesn't support Sanders is voting for selfish reasons. Live and Learn Oct 2015 #189
Is Bill Clinton in the primaries? upaloopa Oct 2015 #3
Hillary Clinton was a member of the DLC riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #7
Still not about the primaries upaloopa Oct 2015 #11
So you don't think a candidates past history is relevant? riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #13
C'mon now. Not when it makes them look bad. Phlem Oct 2015 #56
Have you attempted to post any discussion in any forums lately? truedelphi Oct 2015 #37
They hearings yesterday were not about the primaries. Did you complain about those OPs? Autumn Oct 2015 #42
Make up your damned minds - TBF Oct 2015 #96
Obama was NEVER a member of the DLC. eom MohRokTah Oct 2015 #22
He self identifies as a "New Democrat" which is a DLC identifier riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #27
Same here. truedelphi Oct 2015 #40
Nothing in your link about him being in the DLC. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #85
Lol! Parse away... riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #90
The only parsing being done is by anybody who would say Obama was a member of the DLC. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #91
Lol!!! Oh I read it. Good luck with that... riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #102
Thanks for revealing just how much of an extremist you are. eom MohRokTah Oct 2015 #107
The irony! BeanMusical Oct 2015 #126
The heart break and reductio ad absurdum of Identity politics Fairgo Oct 2015 #152
Nope. Obama is a distinction without a difference riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #132
More extremism MohRokTah Oct 2015 #134
"radical leftist extremists" ? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #135
By their words they shall be known. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #136
Oh the extremist in this thread has made themselves known, all right. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #137
You would certainly know. eom MohRokTah Oct 2015 #139
Yep, I can spot right wing rhetoric a mile away. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #141
I can spot left wing extremism miles away and fortunately it has no effect outside internet forums. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #147
Conservative Dems: Words mean what we want them to mean on DU! beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #148
There is no such thing as "Conservative Dems". MohRokTah Oct 2015 #149
ahem: beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #150
Internet myth. There are no Conservative Democrats MohRokTah Oct 2015 #154
Just because you don't like the label doesn't mean it's a myth. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #155
Parse all you like MohRokTah Oct 2015 #156
Parse = proved Conservative Democrats aren't a myth? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #157
No proof whatsoever, just leftist extremist BS. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #158
bluedogdems.com is "leftist extremist BS"? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #160
Keep digging. BeanMusical Oct 2015 #165
There is no such thing as "Global Warming"! BeanMusical Oct 2015 #162
LMAO! beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #163
Lol! BeanMusical Oct 2015 #164
I'm convinced that you are really great at satire or really awful at trolling. Fantastic Anarchist Oct 2015 #178
What exactly is a "radical leftist extremist?" blackspade Oct 2015 #206
Shame on those radical leftist extremists for bring us the 8-hour workday, labor laws, ... Fantastic Anarchist Oct 2015 #177
Actually, there are millions of sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #186
How dare he/she disagree with you! Fantastic Anarchist Oct 2015 #176
Unknown to him he was listed as a member, and as soon as he found out... George II Oct 2015 #172
He's DLC - there are really better things to discuss TBF Oct 2015 #182
There are a lot of political myths that are accepted as gospel by the majority of people here YoungDemCA Oct 2015 #194
It's weird. I wonder how many people here are really Birthers, too. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #202
His own words: madfloridian Oct 2015 #28
Sweet link. Phlem Oct 2015 #62
Nothing in your link about him being in the DLC. He was NEVER a member of the DLC. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #88
New Democrats rose from the DLC. Don't accuse me of falsehoods and innuendo. madfloridian Oct 2015 #123
Here's a link to help you. madfloridian Oct 2015 #124
Yet another link without anything about Obama being in the DLC. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #128
Being so obtuse is not a virtue, you do realize this, right? Fantastic Anarchist Oct 2015 #179
The ideologies of both Clintons parallel very closely with that of the old DLC and new Third Way. rhett o rick Oct 2015 #192
His own words: George II Oct 2015 #138
.... Phlem Oct 2015 #60
Nothing there about Obama being in the DLC. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #84
Of Course. Phlem Oct 2015 #170
If Sanders ever joined the Democratic Party... George II Oct 2015 #32
Or he could have stayed an Independent while voting for neverforget Oct 2015 #39
Like he did yesterday when he voted against a Dianne Feinstein amendment and... George II Oct 2015 #55
You mean when he stood with 12 Democrats to protect our privacy rights? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #57
He voted WITH Rand Paul and against the majority of Democrats. George II Oct 2015 #67
He stood with these 12 Democrats, not with Rand Paul: beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #68
All I know is that he voted with a Republican Presidential candidate and voted against.... George II Oct 2015 #71
12 Dems, and 1 republican = voting with the republican? arcane1 Oct 2015 #74
So you're hinting that he did NOT vote with someone who could be his opponent next November..... George II Oct 2015 #77
How many republican candidates in 2007 and 2015 voted for, or endorsed, the Iraq war? arcane1 Oct 2015 #80
He voted to protect our privacy rights, and so did Elizabeth Warren. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #76
When Sanders entered the Democratic Presidential race one the rationales both he and his followers.. George II Oct 2015 #116
Really? Do you have a link to where we said he "always votes with the Democratic caucus"? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #117
I don't know why Warren voted against the amendment, all I know is that a Democratic... George II Oct 2015 #119
You would rather have him vote against our interests just to oppose Rand Paul? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #120
Apparently he opposed about three quarters of the Democrats in the Senate, too. George II Oct 2015 #121
Because of privacy rights - good! You didn't answer my question, why do you support the bill? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #122
Here are the other Dems who voted the same way madfloridian Oct 2015 #98
12 Democrats voted against it (27%), 32 Democrats voted for it (72%) George II Oct 2015 #118
The only people i would consider Spirochete Oct 2015 #151
And 50 Republicans voted for it. Which means he voted against 98% of the Republicans voting. RichVRichV Oct 2015 #171
So the majority of the Democratic caucus voted with the GOP. blackspade Oct 2015 #207
No it isn't, you missed my point - Sanders and his followers like to throw out the concept.... George II Oct 2015 #211
You never did say, George, why do you support the bill? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #212
Who specifically makes that arguement? blackspade Oct 2015 #227
"All I know is that he voted with a Republican yada yada" BeanMusical Oct 2015 #131
Not a just a "republican yada yada", but a republican who may be running against Hillary Clinton.... George II Oct 2015 #210
And a Democratic woman who will hopefully be Bernie's VP! beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #214
Yes, he should but he's not. That's very intriguing. BeanMusical Oct 2015 #215
Isn't it? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #217
Great, now I have Seinfeld's theme song as an earworm. BeanMusical Oct 2015 #221
Quick, listen to this George: beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #222
Thanks, far better earworm. BeanMusical Oct 2015 #224
Who's obsessed with Paul? I just find it very disappointing that a person who is running.... George II Oct 2015 #216
You're disappointed that Senators Sanders and Warren are concerned with privacy rights? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #218
Huh? George II Oct 2015 #219
If you fault Bernie because he "stood" with a Republican you have to fault Hillary for doing it too. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #220
Don't you love it when they leave crucial information OUT BuelahWitch Oct 2015 #153
It's the only way to make the memes work. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #159
Please explain why you think the vote was wrong. TheKentuckian Oct 2015 #113
So you are saying Bill and Hillary became DLCers to gain something for themselves? Autumn Oct 2015 #46
I didn't say anything like that. Sanders isn't a "politician", he's an opportunist. George II Oct 2015 #50
In what way is he an "opportunist"? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #59
ALL politicians are opportunists. Volaris Oct 2015 #72
George words do have meaning even if you don't want them to. Autumn Oct 2015 #75
Words mean whatever some Hillary supporters want them to mean: beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #83
I'm actually still chuckling at "Third Way Progressives" riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #92
Me too! But I'm not touching that with a ten foot pole. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #94
Oh me neither. riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #99
It's good for amusement but little else. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #101
Pretty soon it will be Bernie hates Obama! riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #105
They've been using that talking point for months, it's part of the 'Bernie is a racist' meme. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #106
That pathetic attempt at a meme hifiguy Oct 2015 #213
Funny isn't it. My favorite all time poster was the one complaining about rec circles Autumn Oct 2015 #110
You mean Big Rec™ ? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #111
I had no clue he had been trade marked LOL Autumn Oct 2015 #112
That was courtesy of Capt. Obvious! beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #114
That depends on what the definition of 'IS' is. n/t Utopian Leftist Oct 2015 #204
What? Are you really asking if Bill Clinton is in the primaries? rhett o rick Oct 2015 #190
Thanks mad. No matter which candidate one supports, your OPs are always 1st rate riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #5
Just saying is all portlander23 Oct 2015 #6
Good post. Their attacks on the social safety nets is to me a dangerous thing. madfloridian Oct 2015 #8
Great post. Very informative. Thank you. liberal_at_heart Oct 2015 #173
Yep. That's when the Democratic party started abandoning what was traditionally liberal_at_heart Oct 2015 #9
Yes, they "switched loyalties." madfloridian Oct 2015 #15
The New Democrats were very apparent with a new 1998 law to privatize most of the U.S. DhhD Oct 2015 #95
Ah, thanks for that link. madfloridian Oct 2015 #97
"traditionally Democratic values" YoungDemCA Oct 2015 #195
And Third Way site has the info you need about TPP.... madfloridian Oct 2015 #10
Oh Goodie! To think that once again, truedelphi Oct 2015 #44
AND that new trade policy is going through no matter what. madfloridian Oct 2015 #161
K&R CharlotteVale Oct 2015 #12
Is there any lasting, positive testimony of Thirdwayer's contributions to society? Baitball Blogger Oct 2015 #16
They have had plenty of time to prove their way works and have failed. liberal_at_heart Oct 2015 #17
Obviously, there are people who don't realize that fact. Baitball Blogger Oct 2015 #26
K&R FloriTexan Oct 2015 #18
..... madfloridian Oct 2015 #19
Here is one from me. moabfan Oct 2015 #48
Before Clinton, Democrats couldn't gain the WH for 20+ years. JaneyVee Oct 2015 #25
Are you saying that artislife Oct 2015 #29
I think the choice to speak in "years" rather than "terms" is very telling HereSince1628 Oct 2015 #36
He only got in via a third party spoiler by the name moabfan Oct 2015 #53
That's a right wing myth. All evidence points to the contrary. wyldwolf Oct 2015 #78
What I've learned on DU is that some people would rather support gadfly, losing candidates YoungDemCA Oct 2015 #196
Um, it was 16 years between Carter and Clinton.... blackspade Oct 2015 #208
Excellent, thoughtful OP on the FACTS of this reprehensible Think Tank the represents the interests sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #30
"avoid economic populism at all costs" DirkGently Oct 2015 #31
Yeah, but she did once march down there and she told them, cut it out, guys! TwilightGardener Oct 2015 #33
we have yet to see the 401(k) bubble burst but it will. liberal_at_heart Oct 2015 #34
One day shenmue Oct 2015 #38
"shadowy libertarian accusations"???? madfloridian Oct 2015 #45
It's just weird.... haikugal Oct 2015 #142
Can't believe someone thinks I'm libertarian in any way. madfloridian Oct 2015 #143
Yeah.. haikugal Oct 2015 #145
I had already decided - no vote from me for any DLC, DINO, New Democrat Coalition, any politician djean111 Oct 2015 #43
The group's willingness to sacrifice Social Security and other social safety nets... madfloridian Oct 2015 #47
Shkreli Democrats MisterP Oct 2015 #51
Kicked and recommended to the Max! Enthusiast Oct 2015 #54
Thanks. I just wish that the supporters of the conservative democratic candidate would Doctor_J Oct 2015 #64
K & R, explains a lot & makes perfect sense, it's all part of the oligarchy stranglehold mother earth Oct 2015 #65
No more Turd Way! Dont call me Shirley Oct 2015 #82
Third Way? No way? Corporatists davemac Oct 2015 #86
K & R azmom Oct 2015 #87
Neolibs of the world unite! You have nothing to lose but your principles! Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2015 #89
I saw folks trying to re-write history on DU today - TBF Oct 2015 #93
Thanks MadFloridian... Long But Concise & Clear! All I Have ChiciB1 Oct 2015 #100
More from Guardian 2005 Third Way Away Day madfloridian Oct 2015 #104
Others in 2005 were against Hillary Clinton being in the Senate. Blair's emails were known then. DhhD Oct 2015 #184
K & R historylovr Oct 2015 #108
Follow the money ;) Babel_17 Oct 2015 #109
HRC Is A Pawn Of the Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks That Pay For Her Campaign cantbeserious Oct 2015 #127
Kick and R BeanMusical Oct 2015 #129
'Bill' Clinton bigtree Oct 2015 #133
Except of course HRC actually was a DLC member riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #140
that tells me very little about her positions and record bigtree Oct 2015 #144
The DLC has/had very public positions on the issues riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #146
I don't need google bigtree Oct 2015 #181
No, it's misleading to try to separate Hillary from the DLC. DirkGently Oct 2015 #198
I agree Dem2 Oct 2015 #168
I see this discussion as about The DLC and/or The Third Way's influence on the Democratic rhett o rick Oct 2015 #191
more progressive than thou politics? bigtree Oct 2015 #225
Why don't you turn your questions into statements? nm rhett o rick Oct 2015 #228
Nice research Dem2 Oct 2015 #166
Also linked to Social Democracy via Anthony Giddens it seems: ucrdem Oct 2015 #167
If you like the third way you'll just love Hillary's presidency. Bernblu Oct 2015 #169
The legendary Tony Benn used to keep a tea mug in his office that read: forest444 Oct 2015 #185
great post Locrian Oct 2015 #193
K & R AzDar Oct 2015 #197
Thank you emsimon33 Oct 2015 #199
No more Clinton. SoapBox Oct 2015 #200
A kinder, gentler republiconism noiretextatique Oct 2015 #201
What works for CONS (I.E. whatever they can get away with) Utopian Leftist Oct 2015 #203
The essence of Third Way hifiguy Oct 2015 #209
How the Democratic Party Lost its Soul antigop Oct 2015 #223
After NAFTA 13 million new jobs were created, industrial grew 3x fasrer then the 2 previous decades BlueStateLib Oct 2015 #226
Now they say goal should be to have businesses hire all around the world. madfloridian Oct 2015 #229
Democrats were tired of losing the Presidency Recursion Oct 2015 #230
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Let's talk Third Way. Som...»Reply #155