Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Does Hillary talk about .1% owning 90% of the wealth? About redistribution of wealth? [View all]Agschmid
(28,749 posts)89. You brought race into this first... At 1:32am.
Check up thread.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Does Hillary talk about .1% owning 90% of the wealth? About redistribution of wealth? [View all]
Bonobo
Sep 2015
OP
Know Thy Enemy - Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks - And Their Media And Political Party Minnions
cantbeserious
Sep 2015
#1
More important than wealth inequality, is money in politics. That is the #1 issue, imo.
reformist2
Sep 2015
#19
And What Enabled Citizens United - Oligarchs Corporations And Banks - And Their Plans For Control
cantbeserious
Sep 2015
#48
I think this question deserves more attention than counting black people. Am I wrong?? DU? Am I? nt
Bonobo
Sep 2015
#5
Nope. Phony distractions are more important that acknowledging a findamental problem
Armstead
Sep 2015
#65
The notion that Sandes is a racist, or doesn't give a shit about it is a phony distraction
Armstead
Sep 2015
#95
She "reportedly" made the statements behind closed door. LOL. Not quite the same thing.
Bonobo
Sep 2015
#22
Because a politician talking behind closed doors is EXACTLY the same as putting them in a speech. nt
Bonobo
Sep 2015
#32
I wonder why it doesn't resonate... Perhaps it's that "authenticity" thing. I think so.
Bonobo
Sep 2015
#47
Listen to his speeches - He says, quite clearly, that he doesn't want their money!
reformist2
Sep 2015
#70
Yeah, which would be limited in size, and would have no real effect on his total war chest.
reformist2
Sep 2015
#75
Hmmm, didn't hear anything about the .1 percent. Did I miss that? I mean those are her bankrollers.
Bonobo
Sep 2015
#37
I'm just WORRIED that she doesn't seem to really care about the issue like Sanders clearly does.
Bonobo
Sep 2015
#44
Am I missing the part where she actually suggests dong something concrete and effective about this?
Human101948
Sep 2015
#78
Just in case you want to talk about it, the figure for the top .1% is 22%
muriel_volestrangler
Sep 2015
#57
Not sure why. I made no declarative statement in the OP subject line. It is a question.
Bonobo
Sep 2015
#69
Yes, she does and YOU can do your own homework. There, I have set you straight as you
riversedge
Sep 2015
#76
Thank you DSC! I KNEW someone would have the class to come in here and bring racism into it!
Bonobo
Sep 2015
#79
". . . including trying to incite racial politics to divide people with common interests. "
Le Taz Hot
Sep 2015
#82
Might be a good question, "Are you and your biggest donators paying enough in taxes"
Babel_17
Sep 2015
#83
HRC is a tool of Wall Street and a bunch of petrofied Arab plutocrats - the top .01 percent
leveymg
Sep 2015
#101