Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: In FOIA hearing, federal judge says Clinton violated government policy [View all]TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)16. Oh, I think she's going down, and it will be well-deserved. Something totally hinky about her
having a special-exception status carved out for her at the State Dept. while also working for the Clinton Foundation and other side projects. It smells.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't think that's it. My question is why the WH apparently knew all this was going on
TwilightGardener
Aug 2015
#7
No other cabinet official was allowed to bring in an entourage of unqualified groupies
TwilightGardener
Aug 2015
#20
I've seen zero indication that the WH knew she was keeping a secret server in her
askew
Aug 2015
#24
No, it wasn't illegal to use a private account, or have one's own server.
TwilightGardener
Aug 2015
#40
Read that their government issued Blackberries were turned in and destroyed. I don't know
TwilightGardener
Aug 2015
#45
If she's communicating w/state employees at their desks, she's already archiving.
MADem
Aug 2015
#53
If it were on her server it could be viewed as archived by turning it over. Relying on archiving
peacebird
Aug 2015
#85
The "ultimate" archive is to send it TO the server in the institution. And that's what she did.
MADem
Aug 2015
#89
It's gonna be Bernie and we'll be just fine. He's a much candidate than Hillary anyway.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Aug 2015
#86
She probably knew that FOIA's couldn't be sought thru private accounts, so she made it ALL private.
TwilightGardener
Aug 2015
#6
No, just wondering why the DoJ lawyer was arguing in defense of her email set-up.
TwilightGardener
Aug 2015
#12
Oh, I think she's going down, and it will be well-deserved. Something totally hinky about her
TwilightGardener
Aug 2015
#16
She didn't have a "special-exception status carved out for her at the State Dept."
jberryhill
Aug 2015
#21
It's in a news story on CNN--she got some sort of special government employee status
TwilightGardener
Aug 2015
#22
Yeah, there is definitely an issue there with Huma's employment as special employee
askew
Aug 2015
#43
So the FBI investigation is a ruse, meant to distract us with shiny things while they go after Huma?
cherokeeprogressive
Aug 2015
#79
We don't know that State allowed it. Clinton campaign refuses to answer questions about
askew
Aug 2015
#26
I think State did allow it. They would know that she didn't even have a .gov address
TwilightGardener
Aug 2015
#30
Some peons may have known. But, they weren't in any position to do anything about it.
askew
Aug 2015
#39
Except it is false to say that FOIA's can't be sought through private accounts, so her using a
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#67
Putting her in power will be subjecting us to years of investigations.
AppalachianLeftist
Aug 2015
#10
Hillary and her lawyers probably give a damn what that judge thinks.
AppalachianLeftist
Aug 2015
#18
Nobody cares about email except the republicans and Karl roves little helpers
saturnsring
Aug 2015
#29
It is a poor substitute for reasons to vote for their favored candidate, but I guess those arguments
MADem
Aug 2015
#51
Since when is "may have violated government policy" magically transformed into "violating US law?"
MADem
Aug 2015
#31
The handling of Top Secret material is regulated by Statutory Law, not mere "policy". nt
Romulox
Aug 2015
#32
Then why is the judge using the word "policy?" Surely a judge knows the difference. Pffft. nt
MADem
Aug 2015
#38
I don't think this article is about the classified angle, that's being handled by the FBI and DOJ.
TwilightGardener
Aug 2015
#42
The poster would do well to not try to convolute issues--it makes it seem as though he is working
MADem
Aug 2015
#48
I believe they're seeking email between Clinton and her top aides, who all had accounts on
TwilightGardener
Aug 2015
#52
Didn't she travel with them? Seems a bit like overkill to email someone rather than
MADem
Aug 2015
#54
Breaches of governmental policy is not breaking the law or a "crime"....folks need to read.
Fred Sanders
Aug 2015
#59
Shame the comment from the judge has no bearing on the actual work surrounding the servers
Godhumor
Aug 2015
#46
We need to dig up video of Dan Burton shooting melons simulating his assassination
msanthrope
Aug 2015
#65