Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Clinton's Private Server... Laugh it off. Nothing to see here... move along please! [View all]TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)68. I read it as, "This shit was improperly handled and
now it's up to the DOJ to decide how to proceed." It didn't say who did it, or why. I didn't read any exonerations, or any accusations of guilt, for that matter. Just findings from a sample of emails that she FINALLY gave to the State Dept.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
106 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary Clinton's Private Server... Laugh it off. Nothing to see here... move along please! [View all]
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2015
OP
This issue is about being tech savy;right wing concerns are policy/personality centered
Divernan
Jul 2015
#8
You make so many excellent points and thanks for your discussion of your own experience
karynnj
Jul 2015
#88
I'm trying to wrap my mind around your use of Benghazi, Ambassador Stevens, and Vince Foster.
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2015
#49
It's about not reading urgent messages from an Ambassador, no matter where he's stationed.
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2015
#86
It is sad how invested they are in this story in the service of a candidate who will never
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2015
#93
I was taught in Civics one of the roles of president is head of his or her party...
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2015
#95
If you were in possession of all the information on her server, would you brag about it now...
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2015
#20
Please don't delete the references. Sometimes people need to be reminded. Thank You.
Laser102
Jul 2015
#25
No, in fact the IG's have found classified info in her emails--they were stored in her
TwilightGardener
Jul 2015
#35
The IG said specifically that the info contained within four of forty emails
TwilightGardener
Jul 2015
#48
You are simply wrong on the law....and the WSJ has already backed off their article.
Sancho
Jul 2015
#50
The issue I'm discussing is specifically the handling of classified information.
TwilightGardener
Jul 2015
#53
We're just talking past each other. Yes, it matters that classified information
TwilightGardener
Jul 2015
#58
There are penalties for mishandling classified material, even if it's by
TwilightGardener
Jul 2015
#70
It's the complete explanation of the NYT story with the original documents in hand.
Sancho
Jul 2015
#74
Does it deal with the Wall Street Journal's reporting that an Inspector
TwilightGardener
Jul 2015
#75
Bad analogy. Everything at the Manhattan project was classified or secret. Not so with State. nt
SunSeeker
Jul 2015
#60
They determined that she should not have had that info on her server--marked or not.
TwilightGardener
Jul 2015
#57
We really need to do something about the <---!!!squirrel!!!---> infestation of DU.
Zorra
Jul 2015
#40
It isn't up to us to show evidence it wasn't hacked. It's up to YOU to show evidence it was.
wyldwolf
Jul 2015
#26
I think Ben Gazzara died a few years ago. What does he have to do with servers and emails?
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2015
#34
Nothing, just like servers and e-mails will ultimately have to do ...
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2015
#36
A person charged with a crime has to be proven guilty, the person doesn't have to prove their
Thinkingabout
Jul 2015
#52
And if this was a trial, that would be relevant. But this is a political campaign.
jeff47
Jul 2015
#59
The op contained "Prove it wasn't hacked. SHOW me evidence it wasn't hacked. Prove to me and the
Thinkingabout
Jul 2015
#61