Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Clinton's Private Server... Laugh it off. Nothing to see here... move along please! [View all]restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)42. if i were you i would hope hillary is not the nominee
because she won't win the general. People will not trust her in this kind of stuff doesn't help.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
106 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary Clinton's Private Server... Laugh it off. Nothing to see here... move along please! [View all]
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2015
OP
This issue is about being tech savy;right wing concerns are policy/personality centered
Divernan
Jul 2015
#8
You make so many excellent points and thanks for your discussion of your own experience
karynnj
Jul 2015
#88
I'm trying to wrap my mind around your use of Benghazi, Ambassador Stevens, and Vince Foster.
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2015
#49
It's about not reading urgent messages from an Ambassador, no matter where he's stationed.
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2015
#86
It is sad how invested they are in this story in the service of a candidate who will never
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2015
#93
I was taught in Civics one of the roles of president is head of his or her party...
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2015
#95
If you were in possession of all the information on her server, would you brag about it now...
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2015
#20
Please don't delete the references. Sometimes people need to be reminded. Thank You.
Laser102
Jul 2015
#25
No, in fact the IG's have found classified info in her emails--they were stored in her
TwilightGardener
Jul 2015
#35
The IG said specifically that the info contained within four of forty emails
TwilightGardener
Jul 2015
#48
You are simply wrong on the law....and the WSJ has already backed off their article.
Sancho
Jul 2015
#50
The issue I'm discussing is specifically the handling of classified information.
TwilightGardener
Jul 2015
#53
We're just talking past each other. Yes, it matters that classified information
TwilightGardener
Jul 2015
#58
There are penalties for mishandling classified material, even if it's by
TwilightGardener
Jul 2015
#70
It's the complete explanation of the NYT story with the original documents in hand.
Sancho
Jul 2015
#74
Does it deal with the Wall Street Journal's reporting that an Inspector
TwilightGardener
Jul 2015
#75
Bad analogy. Everything at the Manhattan project was classified or secret. Not so with State. nt
SunSeeker
Jul 2015
#60
They determined that she should not have had that info on her server--marked or not.
TwilightGardener
Jul 2015
#57
We really need to do something about the <---!!!squirrel!!!---> infestation of DU.
Zorra
Jul 2015
#40
It isn't up to us to show evidence it wasn't hacked. It's up to YOU to show evidence it was.
wyldwolf
Jul 2015
#26
I think Ben Gazzara died a few years ago. What does he have to do with servers and emails?
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2015
#34
Nothing, just like servers and e-mails will ultimately have to do ...
DemocratSinceBirth
Jul 2015
#36
A person charged with a crime has to be proven guilty, the person doesn't have to prove their
Thinkingabout
Jul 2015
#52
And if this was a trial, that would be relevant. But this is a political campaign.
jeff47
Jul 2015
#59
The op contained "Prove it wasn't hacked. SHOW me evidence it wasn't hacked. Prove to me and the
Thinkingabout
Jul 2015
#61