Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary wins / Bernie loses [View all]Vattel
(9,289 posts)100. Words have meaning.
You claimed that anyone who thinks that there are significant policy differences between Clinton and Sanders is an exclusionary purist ideologue. Obviously that phrase is pejorative and your broad brush use of it to describe anyone who finds significant policy differences between Sanders and Clinton is ridiculous.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
113 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Amen. My Brewers were on fire at the All-Star break last year when the tide turned. It's a long
Ed Suspicious
Jul 2015
#81
these sci-fi memes don't impress anyone except his core voters, same with the 1984 stuff.
bettyellen
Jul 2015
#110
Your 2nd link does not have D nominee Obama's 2007 'electability' stats. You linked to 2008. (nt)
PotatoChip
Jul 2015
#18
Good information, been waiting to see matchups with DNC candidates other than Hillary.
Thinkingabout
Jul 2015
#30
I've noticed that before now that you mention it. An oxymoron, but granted it explains much.
appalachiablue
Jul 2015
#58
Actually the policy differences are central, not to "purists", but to the average American.
mmonk
Jul 2015
#63
Curious about what the name "ConservativeDemocrat" is intended to mean at DU
McCamy Taylor
Jul 2015
#64
And, I would think that since you do like to hunt that you might support BS's stance on guns
Cha
Jul 2015
#75
I think Hillary is pro 2nd amendment.. just for sensible gun laws. you really don't have to
Cha
Jul 2015
#85
"... insignificant to all but the most exclusionary purist ideologues ..." Bullshit.
Scuba
Jul 2015
#69
Yes, pro -war. Voted for the IWR and use of cluster bombs. That's pro war in my book.
Scuba
Jul 2015
#87
Since you are reality-based, you must realize how offensive the tone of your OP is.
Vattel
Jul 2015
#70
So, for example, Clinton's supporting the patriot act vs Sanders' not supporting it
Vattel
Jul 2015
#103
"Is getting a shot at a Sanders presidency by nominating him worth the added risk of losing? " is a
bettyellen
Jul 2015
#112
Why would anyone on this site take someone with conservative in their name seriously?
99Forever
Jul 2015
#71