2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Elizabeth Warren [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)The letter from the Senate women -- and the "accidental" leak of said letter ("accidental" makes it "news" you see--everyone who signed that letter, and the recipient, were likely aware of the "accidental leak" before it happened) generated a few news stories, and a bit of political buzz. This was followed up by Chuck Schumer's endorsement, which created more buzz.
And I guess you missed this?
http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-pn-hillary-clinton-los-angeles-20131104,0,3822697.story
http://jennifergranholm.com/houston-first-stop-for-granholm-ready-for-hillary-fundraisers-in-texas/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ready-for-hillary-campaign-off-and-running-even-if-candidate-isnt-yet/2013/11/07/84f1658a-47cc-11e3-a196-3544a03c2351_story.html
The SuperPAC has already fired up and is running on all cylinders:
https://www.readyforhillary.com/
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/08/ready-for-hillary-super-pac-95099.html
This doesn't happen without coordination on some level.
She's running. I'd bet my bank account, such as it is, on it.