Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 12:28 PM Feb 2013

I don't get the Elizabeth Warren adulation. In fact, I don't get adulation of politicians [View all]

I don't understand the "she'd be a great President" or "Warren 2016!" mentality.

We really don't know where she stands on a host of issues. She's been in the Senate for all of a month.

So what is it with making her the progressive standard bearer?

I like Warren, but the adulation is beginning to remind me of that bestowed on John Edwards. No, I'm not comparing her to Edwards. I'm comparing the sentiment that many direct her way to that which was once directed to Edwards.

Elizabeth Warren was a republican until 1995. That's not a non-starter for me, but I do have to wonder. She's been hawkish on Iran and I don't support the rhetoric she's used about it.

Warren didn't run an outstanding campaign for Senate and has little experience in running for office. That's a huge piece of running for the Presidency.

It's unlikely Warren will run in 2016. She's too smart for that. I'm not saying I wouldn't support her she did, but I'd need to see something extraordinary out of her in the next 12 months to do so.

I suspect Warren will be a very good Senator, but I don't know that. Time will tell.

49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I highly doubt she herself will ever run or even want to run. phleshdef Feb 2013 #1
I don't get adulation, period. n/t NRaleighLiberal Feb 2013 #2
What is it that bothers you about the "adulation of politicians" so much? UCmeNdc Feb 2013 #3
I'm assuming that you know the difference between 'adulation' and support, though cali Feb 2013 #7
The praise for Warren has been earned. geek tragedy Feb 2013 #4
praise for her, sure. adulation? (and pushing her for President at this point constitutes that) cali Feb 2013 #8
Hero worship of many here. RC Feb 2013 #5
Very well said. Common Sense Party Feb 2013 #6
We love and worship them until they turn out to be Jennicut Feb 2013 #17
It hasn't been that long since Harry freakin' Reid was a Dem hero for defending Soc Sec. Bake Feb 2013 #31
"Elizabeth Warren was a republican until 1995." SunSeeker Feb 2013 #9
I missed that. Interesting. n/t pnwmom Feb 2013 #11
Hillary was once a Republican herself. eom tarheelsunc Feb 2013 #12
Yes, we all did things we were embarrassed about in college. nt SunSeeker Feb 2013 #13
Yes, but in 1995 Warren was 46, not a college student frazzled Feb 2013 #22
I was talking about Hillary. SunSeeker Feb 2013 #38
yes, she grew up in a Republican household. Beacool Feb 2013 #40
Hillary was a Goldwater Girl in '64. And Ronald Reagan was a union-supporting Dem before he wasn't. Zen Democrat Feb 2013 #20
Hillary was a teenager when she was a Goldwater Girl. Beacool Feb 2013 #41
it is the the idea of "the great progressive hope" - It has now been more than 40 years since the Douglas Carpenter Feb 2013 #10
And these days, just sounding like a progressive is better than we get from most politicians. nt SunSeeker Feb 2013 #15
The thing is that from what we know, Warren isn't progressive on defense cali Feb 2013 #19
I don't get how those concerns fit with your strong support of a current Republican who has Bluenorthwest Feb 2013 #34
I think your post explains it best davidpdx May 2013 #45
Acknowledging she's doing what Obama should be doing in going after forestpath Feb 2013 #14
it's more an indication of how desperate we are Skittles Feb 2013 #16
+1 DCBob May 2013 #48
She did a lot before she got elected to the Senate! Rider3 Feb 2013 #18
I am more than a little familiar with her record and biography cali Feb 2013 #21
though a bit vague - she has said thing to suggest that she is not a dove - maybe she is closer to a Douglas Carpenter Feb 2013 #33
Very few politicians strike me as having strong core convictions and integrity. TwilightGardener Feb 2013 #23
I think it's inspiration more than adulation.. we adore the brave Voice for Peace Feb 2013 #24
I am guessing you dont spend much time in the Barack Obama group. nm rhett o rick Feb 2013 #25
I know my share of politicians and don't adulate any of them DFW Feb 2013 #26
She says things that we really want said treestar Feb 2013 #27
It's largely a response to all the "Best Secretary of State, ever!" threads. leveymg Feb 2013 #28
Indeed, I was surprised at the brouhaha over her announcement of a new PAC yesterday. brooklynite Feb 2013 #29
I know that every politician has one, but I was surprised by the timing karynnj Feb 2013 #30
Ms. Warren a Republican until 1995- I had no idea. Did she say what changed her mind? midnight Feb 2013 #32
From the wikipedia article ShadowLiberal Feb 2013 #37
I wouldn't call it adulation - Whisp Feb 2013 #35
Well said, thanks. freshwest Feb 2013 #42
Ever spent any time REALLY listening to her speak? cliffordu Feb 2013 #36
What are her views on the "Defense Authorization Act"? DougRees Feb 2013 #39
I will say that when it comes to Harvey Milk I am indeed guilty of adulation dsc Feb 2013 #43
Truth tellers are in short supply. People react well when it happens. DirkGently May 2013 #44
In a word: FuckingDesperation. nm rhett o rick May 2013 #46
Dunno. I guess there are mainly two factors that play into it. redgreenandblue May 2013 #47
She appears to hit all the hot buttons for many progressives. DCBob May 2013 #49
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I don't get the Elizabeth...»Reply #0