Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)Think Hagel’s bad? Just wait until there’s a Supreme Court opening [View all]
The Hagel battle is actually a dry run for the next justice fight -- and it's clear that the GOP will filibuster
BY JONATHAN BERNSTEIN
Compare that Russian meteor hit earlier this week to the one that wiped out the dinosaurs. Got that? Now think about the Chuck Hagel filibuster and what we can expect if a Supreme Court seat opens up sometime soon.
The Hagel filibuster seems to have fired up interest in Senate procedure, but its actually a little difficult to figure out what, if anything, is so unprecedented. The one thing thats clearly new is that its the first time a cabinet nominee has lost a cloture vote. However, its certainly not the first time that 60 votes was required for a cabinet post; its not the first time that a cabinet nomination was delayed by opposition; and if current reports are correct, it wont be the first time a cabinet nomination has been defeated by a filibuster. It certainly isnt the first time a cloture vote has failed on an executive branch pick, or even a high-profile pick.
Some of this is just partisanship. Republicans are making the absurd claim that a 60-vote requirement isnt a filibuster. Democrats are exaggerating how unprecedented this move is.
Still, the political press, and perhaps even Senate Democrats, seem surprised that Republicans really mean what theyve been saying ever since Barack Obama was elected about requiring 60 votes to move anything through the Senate. And if there was a Senate norm against filibustering cabinet nominations, Republicans have no intention of honoring it. And that matters because of the other supposed tradition that will be tested the first time theres a Supreme Court opening: No Court selection has been denied by filibuster.
Now, the first problem with that claim is the case of Abe Fortas in 1968. The Senate took a cloture vote, which failed, and Fortas name was withdrawn. Senators opposing Fortas, however, claimed that it wasnt really a filibuster more or less in exactly the way that Republicans this week denied that the filibuster against Hagel was a real filibuster.
more:
http://www.salon.com/2013/02/16/think_hagels_bad_just_wait_until_theres_a_supreme_court_opening/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
31 replies, 4478 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (27)
ReplyReply to this post
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
true-- I just meant that like the government may completely lose the ability to function at all
NoMoreWarNow
Feb 2013
#21
I'm with you on all of that, except I can not feel sorry for Hagel getting served that which he
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2013
#3
The Republicans will pitch a fit over anybody President Obama nominates
Proud Liberal Dem
Feb 2013
#4
Chuck Schumer was on the expanded PNAC list--he's all pro-Israel hawk. Hagel had to
TwilightGardener
Feb 2013
#28
I would like to see the President nominate 5 women at the same time. It would keep the
DhhD
Feb 2013
#5
..and it will be exponentially worse if the justice being replaced is Scalia
OmahaBlueDog
Feb 2013
#14
The bottom line is that we need to continue to make the SCOTUS more diverse
OmahaBlueDog
Feb 2013
#22
ESPECIALLY if it's to replace a conservative or the 'swing' Kennedy...
Drunken Irishman
Feb 2013
#23