Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
4. I think it's a great move. Why? Several theories...
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 12:45 PM
Jan 2013

1. We need a progressive black person to serve and to counter-balance that nutbag, Tim Scott.

2. We need someone who has a chance to win the general election. I remember Deval stating that he'd rather appoint someone who has a potential to run for that seat and win it.

3. Scott Brown better not play the race card against this guy; he got away with that shit with Liz Warren. He won't get away with it this time.

4. "Mo" is apparently well liked in MA. He's also well known. And, as far as I know, he's a rather noncontroversial pick.

5. Barney Frank was great, but (a) he is not interested in running for the Senate; (b) he's too loud and outspoken and may bring too much noise to the election, providing ammunition for the Republicans; (c) he's ready to retire.

6. Vicki Kennedy is admired but she is a Kennedy and MA seems to be tired of Kennedys vying for political office. The seat was occupied by John Kerry, but Teddy's legacy lingers in MA. For some reason, I get the sense that there is a large segment of the MA population who tire of the Kennedys. Unfortunate and tragic, in my view.

There are positives and negatives probably for both Cowan and Franks LiberalFighter Jan 2013 #1
What are the negatives with Cowan? I thought he was fairly noncontroversial. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2013 #5
No experience on the legislative side in either the House or Senate. LiberalFighter Jan 2013 #6
But, doesn't being the Chief of Staff almost require that he has great insight into Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2013 #8
It all depends on the style he utilized as CoS LiberalFighter Jan 2013 #10
Considering the other black guy is a goddamn loon, Arkana Jan 2013 #2
Amen! madashelltoo Jan 2013 #3
I think it's a great move. Why? Several theories... Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2013 #4
Point 1 is moot imo unless he becomes a candidate in the special election. LiberalFighter Jan 2013 #7
Good points all around. If Cowan has been a CoS for 1 or 2 years, that could be a plus. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2013 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Jan 2013 #11
Thanks for the correction. I thought he wanted someone who would run, but I was mistaken. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2013 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Jan 2013 #13
That's not unusual to appoint an acquantance is it, though? When Mel Carnahan died in the Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2013 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Jan 2013 #15
But Cowan will only be in for a very short time. He won't even be relevant. You wouldn't Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2013 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Jan 2013 #17
No, not really. I trying to get you to see that it's no big deal. Does anyone even remember Kaufman? Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2013 #19
Cowan serves in the US Senate for 5 more months. NPolitics1979 Jan 2013 #18
Cowan has said he has no interest in running for office now or in the future. Marrah_G Jan 2013 #21
Franks would have been more fun.. . . . . .n/t annabanana Jan 2013 #20
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»It's Cowan! Second Afric...»Reply #4