Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

dmosh42

(2,217 posts)

2. Very true about what we can expect from Repukes, which makes me astounded that Reid...

Reply to Peaceful Protester (Reply #1)

Sat Jan 19, 2013, 02:47 PM

Jan 2013

is seeking some 'moderate' version of reducing filibusters. If there is still parts of the rules that require the 60 votes, we can forget about any meaningful legislation. The Republicans are terrible, but our Dems are not much to be proud of.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Filibuster Reform [View all] Peaceful Protester Jan 2013 OP

Milestones in Filibuster History Peaceful Protester Jan 2013 #1

Very true about what we can expect from Repukes, which makes me astounded that Reid... dmosh42 Jan 2013 #2

Would someone please explain to me why we don't just attempt to do away with the filibuster ladjf Jan 2013 #3

Might be for the same reason that the two Calif senators, and a couple other Dem senators.... dmosh42 Jan 2013 #4

Well, that's what I've been afraid of. However, should they all be put to a vote, we could ladjf Jan 2013 #5

I was watching CSPAN in a staffer bar when McConnell did that Recursion Jan 2013 #6

Simply the people in California need to call both of their senators and bug them until they say yes davidpdx Jan 2013 #7