Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 02:11 PM Jan 2013

Obama expected to pick Hagel as opponents prepare for a fight [View all]

White House officials and sources close to Hagel declined to confirm to The Cable that Hagel is the president's choice to replace Leon Panetta at the helm of the Pentagon, but several sources close to the process have told The Cable that the White House and Hagel have been in touch on a regular basis and that Hagel is indeed the expected pick. Decisions about the timing and logistics of the announcement are being finalized now.The Cable had previously confirmed that Hagel successfully completed the vetting process, as have Deputy Defense Secretary Ash Carter and former Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Michele Flournoy.


Meanwhile, Hagel's detractors are moving forward with their campaign against the nomination, which has been expanding ever since The Cable first reported in November that Hagel was in consideration for the Pentagon post. That campaign has included anonymous Senate aides calling Hagel an anti-Semite, the Washington Post editorial board writing that, "Chuck Hagel is not the right choice for defense secretary," and the Emergency Committee for Israel, which counts among its board members Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol, running a television ad criticizing Hagel's opposition to unilateral sanctions against Iran. "For secretary of defense, Chuck Hagel is not a responsible option," the ad claims.
"Even if one left aside Chuck Hagel's dangerous views on Iran and his unpleasant distaste for Israel and Jews, a dispassionate analyst would have to conclude that the case for Hagel is extraordinarily weak," Kristol wrote in an editorial Friday, in which he urged Obama to choose Carter, Flournoy, or Navy Secretary Ray Mabus.The Log Cabin Republicans took out a full page ad in the New York Times to oppose the potential Hagel nomination. Following the publication of the ad, the leader of the group, R. Clarke Cooper, resigned without explanation. He had previously expressed support for Hagel. Cooper and Hagel are both combat veterans.


Three Senate Republicans have come out firmly against Hagel's potential nomination, Sens. John Cornyn (R-TX), Dan Coats (R-IN), and Tom Coburn (R-OK). Cornyn said he can't vote for Hagel due to Hagel's "problem with Israel." Coats said Hagel "has had so much disrespect for the military." Coburn said Hagel "does not have the experience to manage a very large organization like the Pentagon."Other GOP senators have expressed reservations about Hagel without committing to a no vote. Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), who previously praised Hagel as a close and dear friend, suggested recently that Hagel is not a real Republican. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), said on Fox News Sunday, "There would be very little Republican support for his nomination. At the end of the day, there will be very few votes."

http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/01/04/obama_expected_to_pick_hagel_as_opponents_prepare_for_a_fight
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
i'm still not sure why Obama wants him. samsingh Jan 2013 #1
He's less militaristic than many Democrats. nt geek tragedy Jan 2013 #3
Neocons and the Defense Contractors hate him. Interesting tweet today: Pirate Smile Jan 2013 #26
that would be good then samsingh Jan 2013 #33
Hope Chuck has a flak jacket handy. Such craziness over a SecDef pick, I have never seen. TwilightGardener Jan 2013 #2
Same thing when Obama floated Susan Rice Cali_Democrat Jan 2013 #8
An ironic comment considering Hagel attacked Clinton nominee Hormel in a bigoted, hate fueled Bluenorthwest Jan 2013 #9
Yes--though I think the Rice thing was more of a strategic move TwilightGardener Jan 2013 #11
Republican 'reasons' are not what I am talking about. Bluenorthwest Jan 2013 #12
There were plenty of people here who did not want Susan Rice TwilightGardener Jan 2013 #14
So why did Obama nominate Kerry for Secretary of State? TroyD Jan 2013 #21
I read that he liked both candidates almost equally, but once it became clear TwilightGardener Jan 2013 #22
Do we not have any Dems who can fill this post? nt Mojorabbit Jan 2013 #4
We do. But think Jan 2013 #6
That's funny stuff. Republicans have called him a traitor for years on end now. Bluenorthwest Jan 2013 #10
Hagel doesn't give a rats ass if the GOP respects him think Jan 2013 #15
Chuck Hagel was an enlisted soldier and Dan Coats is a fucking retard. Arkana Jan 2013 #5
I am One Who Thinks PBO Should Move Ahead with Hagel's Nomination if That's His Choice Indykatie Jan 2013 #7
The Repubs have crazy views in general with Israel. They support only the right wing there. Jennicut Jan 2013 #13
How about the fact Hagel leftynyc Jan 2013 #16
He apologized for his homophobic remark. The HRC accepted his apology. Even if you don't jenmito Jan 2013 #18
When his name first came up leftynyc Jan 2013 #19
The Dems. who can do this are hawks compared to Hagel (who endorsed Obama in '08) and who jenmito Jan 2013 #23
I saw a tweet today from a FP person which said - imagine trying to get Gates confirmed now. The RW Pirate Smile Jan 2013 #27
Has a Republican president ever chosen a Dem for this position? polichick Jan 2013 #17
Not that I can find, at least as far back as Truman. Clinton however named republican Cohen, and Purveyor Jan 2013 #20
Well, I sure don't vote for Dem presidents so that they can perpetuate... polichick Jan 2013 #24
What are these 'bullshit myths'...may I ask? eom Purveyor Jan 2013 #25
That Dems can't handle the military and... polichick Jan 2013 #31
I agree LukeFL Jan 2013 #28
Pickin' a 'puke as SEC-DEF maybe kills many birds with one stone. If a Dem were picked, indepat Jan 2013 #30
I don't want him Rosa Luxemburg Jan 2013 #29
I think Hagel is a good choice davidpdx Jan 2013 #32
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Obama expected to pick Ha...»Reply #0