Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

FBaggins

(26,733 posts)

2. They weren't "faithless" because of the caucus

Reply to Gothmog (Original post)

Wed Dec 21, 2016, 05:00 PM

Dec 2016

They were trying to come up with a scheme that would convince Republican electors to become faithless. It wasn't because they wouldn't have voted for Clinton if she had won.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

All of the Democratic faithless electors were from caucus states [View all] Gothmog Dec 2016 OP

for sure MFM008 Dec 2016 #1

I like the caucuses here in WA. I enjoy the interaction with the fellow voters NWCorona Dec 2016 #16

They weren't "faithless" because of the caucus FBaggins Dec 2016 #2

Before the election, several of them from WA state were already claiming they won't vote for Hillary LisaL Dec 2016 #5

I saw those reports also Gothmog Dec 2016 #6

Definitely. There's no way to spin this NWCorona Dec 2016 #17

WA also had a primary, by the way. Higher turnout in spite of being meaningless. Garrett78 Dec 2016 #19

Yes. And have Democrats choose the Democratic candidate. Squinch Dec 2016 #3

Minnesota has already voted to eliminate caucuses The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2016 #4

The caucus system is "outdated" and should be eliminated frazzled Dec 2016 #7

I think they demonstrated why even an electoral college is flawed. dubyadiprecession Dec 2016 #8

The problem is it is far more expensive to have primaries. duffyduff Dec 2016 #9

Texas had both but had to drop the Texas two step Gothmog Dec 2016 #10

One possible solution Retrograde Dec 2016 #11

That is how primaries work in many states Gothmog Dec 2016 #13

Agreed. sheshe2 Dec 2016 #12

Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2016 #14

Minnesota had one, but he was replaced with a loyal elector. MineralMan Dec 2016 #15

caucuses are disenfranchising to the democratic base, and those who support it La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #18