Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: A candidate that gets "damaged" by a primary run has no business anywhere near the GE. [View all]TwilightZone
(28,747 posts)121. You just perfectly described yourself.
Congratulations.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
178 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A candidate that gets "damaged" by a primary run has no business anywhere near the GE. [View all]
hellofromreddit
Dec 2016
OP
Every candidate in every election who has an opponent is "damaged" in the primaries.
TwilightZone
Dec 2016
#2
Wasn't that what Hillary was supposed to do? Really vet and field-test him?
The Velveteen Ocelot
Dec 2016
#19
No she was supposed to go for the primary win AND make sure to not lose Bernie's supporters
Madam45for2923
Dec 2016
#24
The "Or Bust" crowd is only happy when they are trashing Hillary or Democrats.
LonePirate
Dec 2016
#32
He did not create Hillary's real problems as a candidate. He did not participate in the hype either.
Ford_Prefect
Dec 2016
#23
The real problem was, Bernie refused to engage Hillary on the emails problem
BlueProgressive
Dec 2016
#82
And now we see what happens when someone isn't even redlined. Hillary was not really hit that bad
Exilednight
Dec 2016
#14
Excellent point, Exilednight! Folks don't see this at all, though. Blamers gotta blame.
JudyM
Dec 2016
#43
zi don't blame the primary, Bernie, or anyone else associatedd with the nomination.
napi21
Dec 2016
#18
Ah, I see. Republican behavor reflects on the Republican Party, but the reverse is not true for...
LS_Editor
Dec 2016
#174
Right. Because a significant number of Democrats here haven't been scapegoating Bernie Sanders.
LS_Editor
Dec 2016
#176
Thank you for confirming my point. Hate the man who acts more like a Democrat.
LS_Editor
Dec 2016
#178
I don't think someone understands the concept of Democrats nominating a Democrat
LonePirate
Dec 2016
#30
I eagerly await the day you make a point instead of arguing hypotheticals.
hellofromreddit
Dec 2016
#46
There is nothing more hypothetical then making vague assertions about the future.
TwilightZone
Dec 2016
#53
I eagerly await the day you acknowledge facts instead of embracing fantasy.
LonePirate
Dec 2016
#114
Its funny. During the primaries we kept getting told that Bernie's huge rallies didn't mean anything
progressoid
Dec 2016
#89
Well, do you agree or not? If you think they were meaningful, then he probably should have done
boston bean
Dec 2016
#109
Because she was such a strong candidate, it was vital she have no real competition
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#41
A candidate that is besmirching the entire party and it's members who vote "estabishment"
boston bean
Dec 2016
#103
If you think we should have a rule excluding independents from running in our primaries,
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2016
#171
Yeah i would since many seem to think it would draw republican white middle class voters.
boston bean
Dec 2016
#120
What i am saying is the argument for bernie was his ability to speak to white workong class.
boston bean
Dec 2016
#123
You are suggesting that the divisions on the left be represented by multiple parties instead of one.
Gore1FL
Dec 2016
#149
None of the above. Why do you ask. We are discussing people who voted for trump m
boston bean
Dec 2016
#145
I have been. If you haven't noticed, I've been disagreeing with you on party building.
Gore1FL
Dec 2016
#166
That's how it works in the U.S. We have 2 dominant parties and build our coalitions in advance.
Gore1FL
Dec 2016
#117
Quite frankly my dear, I didn't give two shits what Sanders did/does, except use our party like....
Tarheel_Dem
Dec 2016
#164
I agree. I think there should be a period of at least three years beforehand where you have to be
stevenleser
Dec 2016
#161
And returned to the US Senate, not as a Democrat, but as an Independent. I don't get it.
Tarheel_Dem
Dec 2016
#163
No problem with what you say, just ready to move on. The Primary is over, the election is over. We
Alekzander
Dec 2016
#39
I know, big mistakes were made & we must learn what they are to avoid them in the future. Actually,
Alekzander
Dec 2016
#111
How would vetting foretell Comey violating the Hatch Act twice with unprecedented letters?
SunSeeker
Dec 2016
#87
A party that can't handle criticism in politics? Might as well complain about poo at the zoo.
hellofromreddit
Dec 2016
#61
Jesus Christ. How many votes do you think he would have pulled in the GE had he run 3rd party.
JCanete
Dec 2016
#88
I must have missed the part of the 2008 primary where Hillary, as her campaign burned around her,...
SaschaHM
Dec 2016
#51
Wait...was that an ad against democrats? Is that what you heard? That is an ad against our system.
JCanete
Dec 2016
#85
That's all well and good as long as people see the whole picture..not just what the media wants you
judesedit
Dec 2016
#56
Never? Get real. It made Obama stronger in 2008. He rocketed out of there and into the GE.
hellofromreddit
Dec 2016
#67
Ah, so never, but with a bunch of exceptions for every time you're wrong.
hellofromreddit
Dec 2016
#76
Ah, I had assumed "incumbent" was a typo, seeing as we didn't have any this year.
hellofromreddit
Dec 2016
#159
Incumbent means incumbent, not whatever you declare it to mean at your convenience.
hellofromreddit
Dec 2016
#173
Paragraph 1 score: -13 points. I did not read the rest. Better luck next time.
hellofromreddit
Dec 2016
#158
A candidate who runs a divisive bitter primary in an important year electorally...and lose the
Demsrule86
Dec 2016
#102
That's absurd. Hell, every election is "The most important bla bla of our lifetime!"
hellofromreddit
Dec 2016
#105
That does sound pretty dumb. I sure am glad I'm not the one saying it.
hellofromreddit
Dec 2016
#160
So after the primary, the party should have nominated someone other than Hillary Clinton?
liberal N proud
Dec 2016
#126
And a Candidate that cannot win a primary also has no business anywhere NEAR A GE
bravenak
Dec 2016
#147