Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RudynJack

(1,044 posts)
18. But it doesn't gain the repubs
Wed Nov 28, 2012, 04:03 AM
Nov 2012

much of anything to pick off one seat. And McConnell and Boehner have proven themselves to be less politically adept than the President. Kerry won't take the role if his seat's in danger.

They're going after Rice because that's all they can do. They have nothing. Their agenda has been solidly rejected, and all they can do is try to gin up outrage over a non-issue. They learned nothing from the elections. It's still "attack, attack, attack". They didn't learn the lesson when they tried it with Clinton, either. They're just frustrated, tired children throwing yet another tantrum.

The msm seems to like the story. It looks like their plan is working. mucifer Nov 2012 #1
Senator Kerry is the better choice for SOS. wisteria Nov 2012 #9
that had occurred to me. BainsBane Nov 2012 #2
Someone said that on TV the other night - it was Lawrence O'Donnell, I think We People Nov 2012 #19
I don't. Kerry will stay in the Senate because we need him there. mccain and graham are slowly still_one Nov 2012 #3
Maybe , just maybe, it should be Senator Kerry's decision to continue being a Senator. wisteria Nov 2012 #8
Which begs the question: Why are Democrats so afraid of Scott Brown? Are there no viable Dems in MA? Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2012 #4
Exactly, and what Democrats are so afraid of Mr. pick-up truck? n/t wisteria Nov 2012 #7
Not any that are as popular as Scott Brown with Indys. n/t Dawgs Nov 2012 #20
Well, if there is absolutely NO viable Democrat to run against this charlatan in Massachusetts, Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2012 #22
I think Maddow is a smart woman, but she is wrong about this. wisteria Nov 2012 #5
Also MA could just change the law to appoint again, rather than elect. Agschmid Nov 2012 #15
I respect Senator Kerry too but the fact that iemitsu Nov 2012 #16
I totally agree--BTW, it took me corneliamcgillicutty Nov 2012 #6
Rachel's from Massachusetts. GeorgeGist Nov 2012 #10
She use to live there but she is from Castro Valley about 5 minutes from JRLeft Nov 2012 #12
Agree! ProudProgressiveNow Nov 2012 #11
I say Kerry should stay where he is Angry Dragon Nov 2012 #13
Parlor game theorizing alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #14
Of course, but Rachel does have a point and I must admit I suspected the same. CTyankee Nov 2012 #17
But it doesn't gain the repubs RudynJack Nov 2012 #18
Even if that is true aren't there any others to consider than Kerry or Rice? WI_DEM Nov 2012 #21
makes sense. Best for America, Mrs. Rice and Mrs. Clinton work as a team for a couple months. then Sunlei Nov 2012 #23
I have a question as to whether SB can run PoliticalBiker Nov 2012 #24
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Rachael Maddow is saying ...»Reply #18