Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Patrick Murphy’s natural gas votes will increase fracking, critics say [View all]cali
(114,904 posts)46. Look, could it be complicated? Sure. Could it have been both? Yep.
but the bottom line is he's a hulk of a guy. She's literally half his size, if that.
And children who grow up in abusive households frequently have a distorted lens and many side with the abusive parent.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Patrick opposes fracking and drilling in the Everglades, opposes drilling off Florida’s coast
NCTraveler
Aug 2016
#1
It's also right in the article that the bills have nothing to do with fracking.
NCTraveler
Aug 2016
#3
Right. Increasing offshore sales of liquid natural gas has NOTHING to do with fracking.....
think
Aug 2016
#6
He's opposed to fracking but supports increasing sales of liquid natural gas. Is that your claim?
think
Aug 2016
#16
The two aren't mutually exclusive. Here is what's concerning that is going on offshore.
NCTraveler
Aug 2016
#18
Riiiiggghhhht, because no corporation has ever exploited a loophole in the law.
Exilednight
Aug 2016
#25
"Riiiiggghhhht, because no corporation has ever exploited a loophole in the law."
NCTraveler
Aug 2016
#29
Welcome to a Republican turned Democrat who didn't vote for the Democrats on this one. Is that
think
Aug 2016
#7
What did the majority of the Democrats do on this vote? Why did they choose to vote against it?
think
Aug 2016
#11
No. My response was what did the majority of Democrats do. They voted against it. Obviously they
think
Aug 2016
#15
Look, I think Murphy sucks politically, but I flat out can't stomach Grayson and never could
cali
Aug 2016
#12
That's still not exactly old. And I thought she was younger too from the photos I've seen.
cali
Aug 2016
#23
There is both video evidence that Grayson's wife is lying and the 21 year old daughter has twice
think
Aug 2016
#31
So we go from Murphey & anti fracking to Grayson's daughter siding with her mom in a domestic duel
misterhighwasted
Aug 2016
#32
Murphy just 3 years ago as a Democrat cosponsored legislation to undermine the Affordable Care Act
think
Aug 2016
#50
Skye Grayson is a 21 year old woman. Your instant dismissal of her statements because she is a
think
Aug 2016
#38
Lolitta CLEARLY lied in the last incident, claimed the daughter abused her, and that daughter now 21
think
Aug 2016
#42