Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: 10 common objections to Hillary Clinton - and how to counter them [View all]BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)32. Hey, the moving goalposts are back. First it was because she cast the vote. But she had already
explained the vote, as demonstrated above, and the explanation is sufficient. She explained, in depth, everything she was voting for and everything she was not voting for. So now that the actual vote can't be used against her, now it's because she didn't do something after the vote??
Nothing will satisfy you, apparently. Every reasonable response gets met with a new unreasonable demand.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Perhaps if I respond with "Authentic Frontier Gibberish," the censorship squad won't strike!
TheBlackAdder
Jul 2016
#40
ah another Sanders fan chanting his projected intolerance. So much fun to hear ad infinitum
Bill USA
Jul 2016
#10
chanting repetitive recitation of the same statement. Bernie fans have from beginning accused
Bill USA
Jul 2016
#39
Re #8. So Bush lied to her, eh? Did she ever call for Bush's impeachment
KingCharlemagne
Jul 2016
#9
Hey, the moving goalposts are back. First it was because she cast the vote. But she had already
BobbyDrake
Jul 2016
#32
Out of curiosity, did Bernie? If not, then why the double standards? I'd like a source too.
synergie
Jul 2016
#42
Why single her out? Because she's running for President? Now, the first (and second)....
George II
Jul 2016
#43
One correction: single-payer legislation would not cause the ACA to be "removed"
Ken Burch
Jul 2016
#33