TIME: Why Hillary Clinton’s Foreign Policy Speech Wasn’t the One She Needed to Give [View all]
She needs to speak to the people, not the establishment
Hillary Clinton delivered a solid, well-crafted foreign policy speech today, and she did it very effectively. But this wasnt the speech she needed to give.
First, her remarks were intended for the foreign policy establishment, the people who care about foreign policy details and Americas role in the world. These are not the people she needs to reach. She must speak directly to those who feel globalization has stolen their livelihoods and dont see why Americans must carry heavier and more expensive burdens than others do. Some of those people are persuadable.
Second, she spent too much presenting herself as the plausible alternative to disaster. Her own foreign policy record is not sterling. She was an active secretary of state, but President Obama didnt deliver his finest foreign policy accomplishmentsstriking the Iran nuclear deal, lifting the embargo against Cuba, negotiating the Transpacific Partnershipuntil Clinton had moved on. She deserves credit for helping to bring Iran to the nuclear negotiating table, but it fell to her successor to complete the deal. Her attempt to reset relations with Russia was a farce from start to finish. The pivot to Asia and agreement on the Transpacific Partnership were her biggest successes, but she has backed away from both while running for president. In short, Clinton is long on foreign policy experience, but short on foreign policy successes.