2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Warning: No Trashing of the Party's Nominee Allowed on DU [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)Last edited Wed Jun 1, 2016, 06:17 AM - Edit history (1)
Not directly from the campaign to me, of course. Broch and Mook stopped calling me a few months ago. No clue why. Fickle, I guess.
Why? Doesn't that sound to you like something from a Clinton campaign? Does to me. Also seems to be an accurate description of the tactics I saw in 2008 and have been seeing in 2016. (Remind me what P.U.M.A. stood for?)
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/4/6/1511446/-Clinton-s-Next-Strategy-Slash-and-Burn-Then-Worry-About-Party-Unity-Later
BTW, since when did the standard for posting someone about a campaign on DU become that the poster had to have heard it directly from the campaign? Cause I'm pretty sure a lot of crap that gets posted here about Bernie and his campaign did not come from either of them. In fact, a lot of it seems to have come starigh tof of a poster's ear.
ETA: my bad. The words I thought I recalled was disqualify and defeat, not discredit and destroy. But, I think the meanings are close.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/4dnnjg/new_low_email_from_the_campaign/