Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Forbes: OIG email report vindicates Clinton [View all]polio2
(98 posts)20. Hillary supporters are just like Trump supporters
Their candidate can do nothing wrong.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I love this line: "To put it differently, she is having a double standard applied to her."
Arkansas Granny
May 2016
#2
You left out the fact that Colin Powell DELETED ALL his AOL emails when he left office.
pnwmom
May 2016
#40
Yes. AOL is a private company, not an arm of the government. All its servers are private.
pnwmom
May 2016
#92
using a commercial email service provider compromises any classified info in any emails sent thru
Bill USA
May 2016
#86
Millions ofGovernment employees decide on a daily basis which of their work emails to save or delete
politicaljunkie41910
May 2016
#93
"To put it differently, she is having a double standard applied to her."
workinclasszero
May 2016
#3
Tiefer is the author of "Veering Right: How the Bush Administration Subverts
sufrommich
May 2016
#14
Legally, there isn't a smidgeon of difference in which non-governmental private server was used,
pnwmom
May 2016
#23
I can't cite a law that doesn't exist. And there is no public records law that distinguishes
pnwmom
May 2016
#37
Fine. I meant "the law" in the general sense. There is NO Federal public records law that makes
pnwmom
May 2016
#42
Wonder why the State Department, under HRC, was firing diplomats for conducting
Press Virginia
May 2016
#54
Hillary used her secure, state-department-installed SCIF system for classified documents.
pnwmom
May 2016
#56
There is no evidence that she had any classified information on her email server
pnwmom
May 2016
#64
Please provide a link showing that there was classified information on her server
pnwmom
May 2016
#71
Once again. Notice the words IC ELEMENT SOURCES...that means it's classified when created
Press Virginia
May 2016
#74
Let's seeeee....either the IG is lying and submitting false information to Congress
Press Virginia
May 2016
#81
I think if you look at pg 43 or 44 of the report you'll find the case of the Nairobi ambassador
floppyboo
May 2016
#65
wonder why the Inspector General disagrees with Politifact? Maybe the whole report is junk?
floppyboo
May 2016
#67
Do yor really believe the IG would include a 'mostly false' bit of information? to what end?
floppyboo
May 2016
#70
This is a discussion of what he did wrong with emails, but nowhere does it say that this was
pnwmom
May 2016
#75
um, maybe not primary, but definitely important, and important enough for this study.
floppyboo
May 2016
#85
Your response to the professor's article was to dismiss him as a right winger. I dismiss
pnwmom
May 2016
#19
He's employed by "flat-taxer" Steve Forbes; I figured there must be some rapport.
lagomorph777
May 2016
#21
Tiefer is the author of "Veering Right: How the Bush Administration Subverts the Law
pnwmom
May 2016
#25
Basically she didn't follow any of the security/FAM rules of HER dept. and lied about it.
jmg257
May 2016
#34
Hardly a vindication. The State Dept report didn't even address classified information violations
leveymg
May 2016
#44
LOL Forbes must have missed the lesson on private email accounts vs. private email SERVERS.
Avalux
May 2016
#49
No, the law professor who wrote this understands that there is NO legal distinction
pnwmom
May 2016
#52
Well that is one endorsement that a liberal would want to avoid, libertarian flat taxer anti-minimum
Todays_Illusion
May 2016
#78
Forbes didn't write it. And the law professor who wrote it also wrote a book called
pnwmom
May 2016
#79
So it just accidentally appeared on the Forbes site? I am not going to visit that malware
Todays_Illusion
May 2016
#80