Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: ABC: Clinton Email Probe in Late Stage, FBI May Question Her [View all]Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)92. As FDR said of the banksters,
"I welcome their hatred".
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And you wonder how all the people WITHOUT the money and who WOULD be prosecuted
pdsimdars
May 2016
#14
No, it is NOT his "only path." California voter here, so stuff it, m-kay?
Peace Patriot
May 2016
#52
She's not brushing this one off. Note the "interview Clinton soon, if they haven't already"
leveymg
May 2016
#36
If you had been reading the papers, you'd know that scenario is not only plausible but probable.
leveymg
May 2016
#41
I have said all along that the FBI will find she violated her security clearance. She'll be pardoned
leveymg
May 2016
#50
Yup. . and funnily enough, they've interviewed everyone else already . . . . Hmmmm. . . .
pdsimdars
May 2016
#15
i have a feeling certain people will not be happy unless she is convicted. n/t.
okieinpain
May 2016
#20
If she's guilty, then conviction. However, she is both "old" and a former First Lady,
IdaBriggs
May 2016
#26
Ie would sadden me if she were convicted of anything. But were she to be forced out or
Autumn
May 2016
#67
Gee, that makes two CIA Directors and a National Security Advisor spies or leakers, doesn't it?
leveymg
May 2016
#45
I am willing to make a wager. HRC will not be indicted. If I lose I leave DU forever. If you lose...
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2016
#46
Of course she will not be indicted. Indictment may be recommended though...
Barack_America
May 2016
#47
A finding that she violated her security clearance is enough to disqualify her in the eyes of voters
leveymg
May 2016
#49
The seminal poster certainly tried to leave the impression she will be.
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2016
#56
I am sure you know more about the relevant law than the woman who actually prosecuted Petraeus.
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2016
#85
I am glad I was able to please you. He didn't mean it to be taken literally. I did.
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2016
#93
""Wish in one hand, crap in the other. See which one gets filled first."
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2016
#33