Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

trudyco

(1,258 posts)
36. Well the point is the Superdelegates are there and they are supposed to pick the most electable
Wed May 25, 2016, 12:48 PM
May 2016

With her investigation Hillary is looking less and less electable.
The SuperDuper Delegates should then do their job. Originally they were all lined up behind her before the primaries even started. That is not their function, they were subverting their reason for being from the get-go. Hence the resentment towards them. Many were bought (I'm using that loosely) by her. More resentment. All reasonable resentment I might add.

People say she's ahead. I don't agree. It looks like she or somebody on her behalf has committed election fraud. There is evidence worth investigating. Certainly there has been disenfranchisement. Any Superdelegate who actually cares about democracy should be concerned. It's the same pattern we saw with the voting machines and "shennanigans" with Shrub.

So if I was Sanders I would be courting the superdelegates and pointing out the obvious. She's becoming less and less electable. She did it to herself, this isn't Sanders doing. Since we have Superdelegates they should do their job, which is not to rubber stamp the supposed primary vote, but to promote the most electable candidate. The point is to get a Democrat in the White House and when the Dems accepted Bernie into the Primaries they accepted him as a Dem. The argument that he isn't a real Democrat doesn't hold. He is the best bet to win the Whitehouse and mostly holds the views of Democrats. He's less DLC and more progressive/populist/and-oh noes - socialist but those values have always been in the party, they've just been overshadowed by the DLC lately. If he is able to get some of his programs in then the Democratic party will have pulled in new young voters and old progressive stalwarts who had given up and retain people like me who will most likely leave after this election if Hillary is nominated. This revitalizes the dwindling party. This helps get more Dems into Congress and lower ticket, too.

We can preserve Obamacare and maybe make it better. We can finally fix Social Security so it lasts and get rid of the spouse penalty (a great idea of Hillary's to borrow). We can start working on Global Warming and give the young hope again with affordable college. America is in crisis and the Democratic party is faltering.

Thanks for the CIA-type take on Bernie. I was dying to know. merrily May 2016 #1
I followed Kos for years, contributing to rebuild the site. He's gone completely establishment. TheBlackAdder May 2016 #2
That's your rebuttal? lol nt BootinUp May 2016 #3
The first responses are perfect examples of the genetic fallacy. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #4
Projection is so typical of certain posters. TheBlackAdder May 2016 #9
I can not give your rebuttal a passing grade. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #11
I stopped at the 'socialist' dog whistle, because that shows a skewed mentality. TheBlackAdder May 2016 #12
He proudly calls himself a socialist, albeit a democratic one. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #14
We're all socialists to some extent--a big difference between the two that nefariously is cut out. TheBlackAdder May 2016 #17
I wish all of us would operationalize our terms when it comes to capitalism and socialism. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #18
My rebuttal is that I discount most of Kos, since he operates like any other money-driven MSM. TheBlackAdder May 2016 #7
His site enables freedom of expression, I am sure he supports your right BootinUp May 2016 #10
Your comment does not directly apply to the words I wrote, sans FOX, most allow free expression. TheBlackAdder May 2016 #13
Freedom of expression? Only if you support Clinton! Ha...what a stooge. haikugal May 2016 #30
Moulitsas was always establishment, he was clearly a sympathizer of the right wing government... AZ Progressive May 2016 #27
He wanted to BE CIA....and they rejected him. haikugal May 2016 #31
According to him... AZ Progressive May 2016 #38
Yeah...pretty pathetic isn't he? haikugal May 2016 #39
He is right. And basically is stating what Bravenak posted yesterday! boston bean May 2016 #5
oh gawd...that's just sad. haikugal May 2016 #32
The 800 pound gorilla that will deny her the nomination isn't Sanders or Comey. It's really Hillary leveymg May 2016 #6
Thank you for starting my day off with a chuckle. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #8
Very succinct. And oh. so. true. trudyco May 2016 #33
DU rec... SidDithers May 2016 #15
"Bernie Sanders pushing for a superdelegate coup, one that would discard the will of the Democratic workinclasszero May 2016 #16
Well the point is the Superdelegates are there and they are supposed to pick the most electable trudyco May 2016 #36
The supers are not supposed to go against the popular vote of the people workinclasszero May 2016 #37
Pot meet kettle. n/t leeroysphitz May 2016 #19
K&R workinclasszero May 2016 #20
Superdelegates are there to save the party from some of the perils of democracy. Orsino May 2016 #21
The D party will evolve, I have faith. Revolutions can have BootinUp May 2016 #22
Change is a-coming. Orsino May 2016 #23
... vintx May 2016 #24
Excellent article. Cali_Democrat May 2016 #25
I'd like to know how anyone can be cocksure that he's lost stupidicus May 2016 #26
Kos has shown his colors. He's done. Sacrificed himself on the altar of neoliberalism. R.I.P. Zen Democrat May 2016 #28
Moulitsas was a sympathizer of the right wing government of El Salvador during the El Salvador civil war AZ Progressive May 2016 #29
Yep. Octafish May 2016 #34
Ha, you just reminded me of Operation Mockingbird vintx May 2016 #35
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Moulitsas: Sanders's soci...»Reply #36