Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
8. So does David Bonior.
Thu May 19, 2016, 05:24 PM
May 2016

He and other great Democrats were targeted by the Right for supporting democracy, justice and equal rights for Cubans and Nicaraguans and El Salvadorans and others brutalized by the 1-percent.

GOP Michigan legislature redistricted one great Party Whip out of his seat. Other liberal, progressive and humanitarian Democrats, likewise got the ziggy in the press and at the ballot box for opposing genocide in the name of capitalism.



CIA Out of Control

Russ Baker
Village Voice, Sept. 10, 1991

EXCERPT...

Dellums press secretary Max Miller says the representative from
Berkeley, together with majority whip David Bonior--another
outspoken liberal--made an agreement with Speaker Thomas Foley to
maintain a low profile in return for gaining seats on the committee.
After one full round of legislation and briefings, Miller says,
Dellums will be heard from. "They wanted to find out as much as
they could before speaking out." Meanwhile, the energetic Oliver
North, in his role as president of something called the Freedom
Alliance, has launched a campaign to collect a million Dump Dellums
signatures. He calls Dellums "a pro-Marxist, antidefense radical,"
who would be a threat on the "supersensitive" committee. Putting
Dellums on the panel, North says, was an "extremely reckless and
very dangerous appointment."

And those who make trouble get trouble. Reports and rumors that
the apparatus pokes into the personal lives of members of Congress
underlines the danger of investigating national security agencies.
"There's a little bit of fear that if you do go after the
intelligence community, your career is threatened," says McGehee,
author of "Deadly Deceits: My 25 years in the CIA." Even the
complacent Senate intelligence committee chair David Boren has
reason to worry. According to the "Voice"'s Doug Ireland (see Press
Clips, May 28), Boren faced a vicious primary battle in his first
senatorial campaign, during which his opponents accused him of being
a homosexual. At a press conference, Boren swore on a white Bible
that he was not. "It would therefore be utterly churlish," Ireland
wrote, "to speculate on whether or not the Company has a file on the
state of its tamed watchdog's libido." Since then, Boren has called
Robert Gates "one of the most candid people we've ever dealt with."

Leading congressional critics of the CIA have been defeated,
despite their long, distinguished careers in Washington and
Congress's nearly foolproof 98 per cent reelection rate. Both Otis
Pike and Frank Church were defeated soon after chairing their
precedent-setting '70s hearings. Pike's report had been so
incendiary that Congress voted not to release it before the White
House had a chance to censor the document. (It was ultimately
leaked to and published by the "Voice.&quot Pike's committee staff
director had been warned by the CIA special counsel, "Pike will pay
for this, you wait and see--we'll destroy him for this," according
to "The New York Times." Also defeated were outspoken senators Dick
Clark, Birch Bayh, and Harold Hughes. Foreign money--possibly South
African--is believed to have financed the defeat of Clark, a vocal
critic of the CIA and U.S. ties with South Africa.

Challenging the CIA also means trying to rein in dictatorial
tendencies that naturally accrue to the occupant of the Oval Office.
"Every president of the United States, no matter what he says before
he becomes president, about how he's going to clean things up," says
Marchetti, "once he gets in there and finds out that's *his* agency,
that's *his* intelligence community, hey, all bets are off."

One man who told the truth blew his chance to become CIA
director, thanks to "reformer" Jimmy Carter. Hank Knoche, acting
director following Bush's retirement, had been called down to a
Senate committee. "The chairman was complaining that `we just don't
know what's really going on,'" says Marchetti, who was privy to the
details of the incident. "They asked [Knoche] about covert action
operations: `Do we know all the stuff that's going on? Could you
tell us more about them?'" Asked to reveal the 10 largest ongoing
operations, Knoche offered to name a few of the lesser ones, despite
urgings from his aide that he keep his mouth shut. President Carter
reportedly heard about it, and was none too happy. Instead of
Knoche, the odds-on favorite for the slot, he named intelligence
novice and old Naval Academy chum Admiral Stansfield Turner. "Hank
learned his lesson that day," says Marchetti.

CONTINUED...

https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/alt.conspiracy/G8CP9pwqjvU



That's good DNA.
He does have Fidel wilt the stilt May 2016 #1
Dumbest post of the hour....^^^^right here folks! nt nc4bo May 2016 #2
They don't have much, so they embellish. senz May 2016 #5
Call it Skinner! bahrbearian May 2016 #6
So does David Bonior. Octafish May 2016 #8
Obviously you Bernie fans are just jealous LondonReign2 May 2016 #3
Maybe a set of handcuffs, heh, I mean, cufflinks and I'll feel my Social Security. Octafish May 2016 #9
!!! AtomicKitten May 2016 #10
PNAC is rightwing/corporate imperialism at its worst. senz May 2016 #4
''Money trumps peace.'' -- appointed pretzeldent George Walker Bush, Feb. 14, 2007 Octafish May 2016 #12
Bernie Sanders is not a NEW DEMOCRAT, thank God! K&R bobthedrummer May 2016 #7
I will never vote for or support any of their membership. djean111 May 2016 #27
Your candidate also doesn't have the Democratic nomination, either. :) Tarc May 2016 #11
That's what's so frustrating. Octafish May 2016 #15
"I keep expecting people to vote based on integrity, record, and Democratic vision. " Juicy_Bellows May 2016 #16
They do vote for those things, they just see it more in Hillary and Bernie Tarc May 2016 #22
He has an NRA bone in his trigger finger. nt LexVegas May 2016 #13
Did they pay him $250,000 per speech? Octafish May 2016 #14
Your candidate also doesn't have enough delegates or votes...nt SidDithers May 2016 #17
Or money, by the look of things. Octafish May 2016 #23
Too bad your candidate was not able to clearly articulate his plans to push forward his agenda, anotherproletariat May 2016 #18
Bernie has detailed plans for every one of his proposals senz May 2016 #19
The issue Bernie has been banged up on so much, race... TCJ70 May 2016 #24
Precisely. senz May 2016 #40
He has excellent plans, actually: Democratic Action. Octafish May 2016 #25
Hillary does frustrated_lefty May 2016 #20
''We came. We saw. He died.'' Octafish May 2016 #26
Nah, he's gumper... that's even worse uponit7771 May 2016 #21
Worse than lying America into illegal, immoral and unnecessary wars? Octafish May 2016 #29
Clinton admits a mistake Sanders holds on to his gumper views, again... much worse uponit7771 May 2016 #32
Like when she overruled Obama regarding Honduras? Octafish May 2016 #39
That's quite a telling statement. Avalux May 2016 #31
Nope, don't support PNAC and don't support gumpers either uponit7771 May 2016 #33
Then your support of Hillary is completely illogical. n/t Avalux May 2016 #34
HRC isn't a gumper or PNAC supporter but go ahead with all the CTs you want if it helps come.... uponit7771 May 2016 #35
Robert Kagan is her foreign policy advisor. Avalux May 2016 #37
Robert Kagan lapfog_1 May 2016 #28
K&R! KoKo May 2016 #30
I think a lot of people don't know about or have forgotten PNAC's existence. Avalux May 2016 #36
K&R nt silvershadow May 2016 #38
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»My Candidate doesn't have...»Reply #8