2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)I'm sick and tired of hearing Clinton is the most qualified ever w/NO facts cited to back it up. [View all]
And no just holding an office isn't sufficient. The disastrous record of the Two-for-One Couple (e.g., Nafta, media ownership, crime bill, financial deregulation), her record as Senator (the Iraq War Vote) and as SOS (blowing up Libya, Honduras, etc.) does not support the assertion.
If time spent in govt jobs makes you the most qualified (rather than what you actually DID), then by your logic Cheney would best Clinton for most qualified title.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Cheney
When you look at what she actually DID, at her actual record she would be a disaster for this country.
Where are her accomplishments?
What did she ACTUALLY DO to warrant the title of most qualified.
Only in Washington and the Corporate Media World does having a record of major skew-ups that have seriously damaged this country and its people make you the most qualified person to hold the highest office in the land. With a few more screw-ups under her belt, she should be the most qualified person to rule the world.
Update: In reply to comments below, the only people who would view what I listed as a list of accomplishments is her big money backers (the billionaires and corporations).