Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PufPuf23

(8,774 posts)
59. You are wrong and I suspect you know you are wrong but made your statement anyway.
Mon May 2, 2016, 07:40 AM
May 2016

Folks are free to spend their time and monies as they wish, many do not agree with you. People in some states, like myself in California, have yet to primary vote and candidates are still active in campaign mode.

Weak sauce is comparing the finances of Sanders with Clinton. The candidates do not live in the same world of relative wealth.

By law, POTUS candidates cannot use campaign money for personal use.

From: http://www.factcheck.org/2008/11/personal-use-of-campaign-money/

Q: Can the presidential candidates keep their campaign money?

A: No. They can donate any contributions they haven’t spent to charities or political parties, and they can pay leftover campaign bills. The big rule is: no personal use.

As Bob Biersack from the Federal Election Commission points out, most candidates don’t have much left over to begin with. Campaigning is expensive, and “leftover” money gets used for bills and debts first, including expenses incurred while winding down an abandoned campaign or a lost political office.

Candidates do sometimes end up with surplus funds, though, particularly if they’re incumbent members of Congress who decide not to run for another term. State and local governments have their own rules, but those running for federal office – including presidential candidates – must abide by strict FEC guidelines when it comes to their extra campaign money. They can donate an unlimited amount to a charity or political party. They can also, within limits, make contributions directly to other candidates. A campaign committee can give up to $2,000 per election to each candidate. If the committee is converted into a political action committee, the limit jumps to $5,000 – but to be established as a PAC, the committee would have to be in existence for six months, receive contributions from 50 donors, and make contributions to five recipients.

What candidates can’t do with leftover money is use it for personal expenses. Retiring federal lawmakers used to be able to pocket extra cash and use it for cars, vacations, clothes, pet grooming, whatever – but that changed in 1989 with the passage of the Ethics Reform Act.

Bumper stickers, yard signs, HUGE RALLIES! grossproffit May 2016 #1
yet it's votes that count - not signs, stickers, and rally attendance DrDan May 2016 #13
Facebook, Reddit, DU and KOS too!!! workinclasszero May 2016 #61
... and HA Goodman. NurseJackie May 2016 #63
Meaning what? HassleCat May 2016 #2
We have a right to vote for our candidate the hell he would have been pushed away by your side. bkkyosemite May 2016 #5
Yes, he's wasting peoples time and energy asking for money and keeping it for himself mostly uponit7771 May 2016 #39
I personally authorize Bernie to spend my donations on a trip to Hawaii... Human101948 May 2016 #53
I'm sure Bernie and Jane are eternally grateful COLGATE4 May 2016 #66
Hopefully they will pay all the bills first, unlike Hillary who raked in tens of millions... Human101948 May 2016 #67
Time will tell if they do or don't. nt COLGATE4 May 2016 #68
You are wrong and I suspect you know you are wrong but made your statement anyway. PufPuf23 May 2016 #59
This is false, 1. Sanders is still asking for money, 2. GE polls mean not a damn thing right now uponit7771 May 2016 #69
So what if Sanders is still collecting money. He is still a candidate for primaries yet to occur. PufPuf23 May 2016 #70
Money gets tight LOL....He made just as much this month as Hillary made last month and he bkkyosemite May 2016 #3
But I was just told that Sid can't vote for Clinton or Trump byyiminy May 2016 #6
If Bernie makes a miracle comeback... SidDithers May 2016 #14
Fundraising dropped sharply from where it was in months KingFlorez May 2016 #9
She is not spending money on the remaining races Demsrule86 May 2016 #47
I wonder how she will be blamed for her win this time since voting is done mostly by mail in CA. n/t JTFrog May 2016 #4
This is what they're going with "California SOS huge Hillary fan." grossproffit May 2016 #7
Lol, I knew there would be something. n/t JTFrog May 2016 #8
No that's Oregon...I am a Californian in Oregon. Oregon is by mail. CA is by going to your polling bkkyosemite May 2016 #10
I live in CA. I vote by mail. Don't know what you are talking about. JTFrog May 2016 #12
nope, California has allowed voting by mail for years and i'm in a high population area JI7 May 2016 #27
70+% of voting in CA is early voting via mail obamanut2012 May 2016 #57
Voting by mail here too... revmclaren May 2016 #65
Sanders could win CA and it wouldn't really matter. Garrett78 May 2016 #11
Yes, and it will show what a pathetically weak candidate Hillary is... Human101948 May 2016 #55
Polls done for every region show him at 61.5% support Tiggeroshii May 2016 #15
You should check out some of the other "analysis" done by thepoliticalanalyzer... SidDithers May 2016 #16
Did you read the "About" page on this guy's blog? VOX May 2016 #20
+1, wtf is a "Italian Psychologist"?! These guys scare the shit outtah me uponit7771 May 2016 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #43
No way he has that kind of lead Demsrule86 May 2016 #49
K & R Scurrilous May 2016 #17
K & R BootinUp May 2016 #18
K&R ismnotwasm May 2016 #19
The Weekly doesn't know its ass from its elbow whatchamacallit May 2016 #21
Steady as she goes in California, Hillary! Cha May 2016 #22
Second that emotion. ucrdem May 2016 #23
No kidding! Cha May 2016 #26
Thirded! fred v May 2016 #25
Some things are just so predictable, fred! Cha May 2016 #29
and that he actually won the primary even though with less votes DrDan May 2016 #54
Great song workinclasszero May 2016 #62
Fourthed Firebrand Gary May 2016 #28
Hey, Gary.. haven't Cha May 2016 #32
Bernie Sanders has succeeded before in going up in the polls. Eric J in MN May 2016 #24
In open primary states uponit7771 May 2016 #36
Bernie has very much of a chance to take CA and take it big. highprincipleswork May 2016 #30
Because a month is just a nanosecond in politics? Or is this expected to remain stagnant for silvershadow May 2016 #31
Same can be said about Sanders General Election polling argument then, he shouldn't be running now uponit7771 May 2016 #37
The headline is a lie, based on sentences IN THE SAME ARTICLE. Incredible. reformist2 May 2016 #33
Well dammit that changes things, OP should be "Little to no chance in hell" and that would've made i uponit7771 May 2016 #38
What the Fuck is a Bro Sky Masterson May 2016 #34
Hillaryspeak for "a man". (nt) w4rma May 2016 #40
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #44
"Bros hate being beat by a woman." Fast Walker 52 May 2016 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #46
HRC is not a "girl". Fast Walker 52 May 2016 #48
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #52
In 1984, I was told that about Gary Hart rpannier May 2016 #41
I was at the CA HRC delegate election yesterday. Starry Messenger May 2016 #42
K & R enthusiastically. Surya Gayatri May 2016 #50
K&R! stonecutter357 May 2016 #51
According to your article, 538 syas that he has a 9% chance of winning California Vattel May 2016 #56
Too diverse. nt LexVegas May 2016 #58
Yes that's one big reason why he will lose California workinclasszero May 2016 #64
Aren't you Canadian? masmdu May 2016 #60
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sorry Bros, But Bernie Do...»Reply #59