Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

imagine2015

(2,054 posts)
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:12 PM Apr 2016

Jane Sanders to FBI: Get the lead out on its Clinton e-mail investigation [View all]

POLITICO
Jane Sanders to FBI: Get on with Clinton email probe
By Nick Gass
04/29/16


The FBI should get the lead out on its investigation over Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server during her time as secretary of state, Jane Sanders said Thursday.

During an interview with Neil Cavuto aired Thursday on Fox Business, the wife of Bernie Sanders and one of his closest political advisers also said that the campaign would continue to draw distinctions with Clinton on policy issues and not personal affairs.

Sanders noted that her husband's campaign has said as much from the very beginning of the campaign, particularly after he remarked during the first Democratic debate that the American people are "sick of hearing about your damn emails."

But Jane Sanders also noted that the Democratic candidate said there was a process, remarking that the FBI investigation is going forward.

"We want to let it go through without politicizing it, and then we’ll find out what the situation is. And that’s how we still feel," Sanders said. "I mean, it would be nice if the FBI moved it along," she added, with a laugh.



"it would be nice if the FBI moved it along," Jane Sanders says of the probe into Hillary Clinton's private email. |

http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/04/jane-sanders-hillary-clinton-fbi-222624


117 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Awww CorkySt.Clair Apr 2016 #1
And still just might. NWCorona Apr 2016 #3
Thanks for that. CorkySt.Clair Apr 2016 #5
It didn't work out to well for that guy nt NWCorona Apr 2016 #33
I would not be surprised if they take their time. Baobab Apr 2016 #83
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #6
"Poor Jane"???? As opposed to multi-millionaire Hillary. imagine2015 Apr 2016 #10
Well, we do not know, their refusal to actually release their tax records synergie Apr 2016 #27
I know. And so do you. But fling more mud if that's the best you can do. imagine2015 Apr 2016 #78
You don't know and neither do I, because it's simple fact that they have not been transparent synergie Apr 2016 #84
Nice whisle right there nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #109
It's more millionaire Jane v multimillionaire Hillary. nt COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #35
Jane is a millionaire? News to me. Hillary is a multi-milionarie x at least 150. If Jane silvershadow Apr 2016 #76
Anything about their finances woudl be news to us all, since Bernie and Jane refuse to release their synergie Apr 2016 #85
transcripts? nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #86
Sure, why not have all the candiates release their paid speech transcripts? synergie Apr 2016 #94
They have. Except one. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #96
That's kooky! I never knew the IRA and the Sandanista's paid for Sanders' speeches! Wow! floppyboo May 2016 #115
Jane and Bernie are more than well off. And I believe COLGATE4 May 2016 #99
Upper middle class nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #110
Its pathetic...this is all the dead enders have to cling to workinclasszero Apr 2016 #18
All to cling to? I'm clinging to hearing from Hillary about her transcripts, breaking up big banks ViseGrip Apr 2016 #21
Ok I'll play workinclasszero Apr 2016 #25
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #30
Actually, I'd be more worried about Bernie getting us COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #37
Riiight, because Sanders is such a war hawk notadmblnd Apr 2016 #41
If you think anybody is in a position to make that area a 'garden of Eden' COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #48
And may your god help us all from blood thirsty, power hungry would be leaders notadmblnd Apr 2016 #71
Didn't I just read this post at Free Republic? The language COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #73
I wouldn't know. I don't frequent the site notadmblnd Apr 2016 #75
Then you have someone at FR that thinks almost COLGATE4 May 2016 #100
Facepalm nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #111
I heard that Jane wanted to be "the next Abigail Fillmore" Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #19
Really? I would have picked a different Abigail. Beacool Apr 2016 #87
She might be thinking of the wrong Fillmore. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #91
LOL!!! Beacool Apr 2016 #92
The problem is nobody knows what the FBI has uncovered if anything. NWCorona Apr 2016 #2
You missed the CSPAN report, not reported anywhere else yet. It's really ViseGrip Apr 2016 #22
I am guessing this is another of those anonymous posts put up on span that has nothing synergie Apr 2016 #28
I meant other than what's currently known NWCorona Apr 2016 #34
Youtube has lots of stuff, do a search on youtube for the clinton email scandal pdsimdars Apr 2016 #40
Wow. Now we have a new meme: It's ESPIONAGE!!!! COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #38
Damn right wing Andy823 Apr 2016 #50
I can't wait! nt COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #54
She's right...even if the results are complete exoneration. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2016 #4
I doubt that there will ever be complete exoneration tularetom Apr 2016 #8
Lets separate official exoneration from exoneration by conspiracy kooks. nt BootinUp Apr 2016 #14
So the FBI are "consipracy kooks" now? Sounds like they're not the ones who have gone off pdsimdars Apr 2016 #43
you missed my meaning completely, which was exactly the opposite. nt BootinUp Apr 2016 #55
Jane WTH is yours and Bernie's personal financial disclosure??? workinclasszero Apr 2016 #7
Right. The Sander's are hiding millions received from their Wall Street benefactors! imagine2015 Apr 2016 #13
"Get the lead out"? That is NOT what she said. People should look at the video. George II Apr 2016 #9
Everybody knows she did nothing wrong Skink Apr 2016 #11
lol Hiraeth Apr 2016 #31
The ultimate killer argument: "Everybody knows". COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #39
Pathetic. seabeyond Apr 2016 #12
Get it done. Nothing to hide. Right? imagine2015 Apr 2016 #15
It has been done many times and the rw and now Sanders is making sure it will never be done. seabeyond Apr 2016 #20
how is discussing it on Faux News network "not politicizing it" ? BootinUp Apr 2016 #16
I emailed them that they shoud bring it up more. It is a HUGE factor for the Democrats pdsimdars Apr 2016 #45
You mean like the President did? Bob41213 May 2016 #102
I usually try not to get candidates' spouses into these things, but I really don't like her. Zynx Apr 2016 #17
Of course she is honest felix_numinous Apr 2016 #23
There appear to be some serious questions about monies COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #42
Of course, pdsimdars Apr 2016 #47
My goodness, Jane Sanders has the political acumen of an empty paper bag Tarc Apr 2016 #24
"Regurgitating Bernie talking points" BuddhaGirl Apr 2016 #57
Hillary needs a teleprompter at her small meetings. Bernie and Jane don't at their big meetings. imagine2015 May 2016 #103
Perhaps because their dictionary has nothing but "YUUUGE" and "BANK" Tarc May 2016 #117
I don't think they extradited Gruccifer for grins and giggles Kalidurga Apr 2016 #26
And he got Sid's emails to and from Hillary and there was classified info in them pdsimdars Apr 2016 #49
All righty then ClintonEmail.com Kalidurga Apr 2016 #58
what we don't want is our Democratic nominee to be indicted Rosa Luxemburg Apr 2016 #29
I believe the sander's should stop alienating democrats now... dubyadiprecession Apr 2016 #32
At least in my thinking, this thread isn't about party unity but the FBI investigation pdsimdars Apr 2016 #59
Better now than 3 months from now. Or, if elected, one year from now. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2016 #36
Even better than 'not indicted at all', right? COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #44
I doubt she will be. But, if the law calls for it, don't you think she should be? Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2016 #51
If she is it's because the law called for it. What I think COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #53
Then why bother thinking at all? Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2016 #62
Ask a silly question - get a silly answer. COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #70
I was asking you for your opinion. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2016 #72
My opinion, like yours, is totally irrelevant. COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #74
Still no opinion on whether she should be indicted if found to be in violation? Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2016 #77
An indictiment COLGATE4 May 2016 #98
She's got a point and I'm puzzled why Hillary supporters aren't verklempt. Vinca Apr 2016 #46
They are discovering more and more. They thought it would be tied up in January. Now they pdsimdars Apr 2016 #60
Yes look how quickly the White Water investigation wrapped up Buzz cook May 2016 #106
What's your point? Vinca May 2016 #107
That you are Buzz cook May 2016 #112
Or I might prefer reality. Vinca May 2016 #114
Perhaps this may be the first time the Clinton Shuffle doesn't work. libdem4life Apr 2016 #52
Some Republicans have already talked about it. With the emails that have come out, pdsimdars Apr 2016 #63
Yes, the high/low point takeaway from that "amazing performance" was.... libdem4life Apr 2016 #66
I think the email controversy is complete bullshit, but it would be nice to get it out of the way killbotfactory Apr 2016 #56
Yea, except they have 2 emails of her explaining to someone on her staff pdsimdars Apr 2016 #64
Our government officials are largely clueless when it comes to tech issues. killbotfactory Apr 2016 #67
Again, you base it on what you "think" rather than what happened,. pdsimdars Apr 2016 #80
They also have emails between her 840high Apr 2016 #68
It should not matter whether Hillary concerns herself with the minutiae of IT policy or not. -none Apr 2016 #69
And they are required by law to report it if they see any misuse of classified information. pdsimdars Apr 2016 #81
Reality and the law says yes. But it depends on who is abusing things. -none Apr 2016 #93
Isn't Ms. Sanders being investigated for irregularities RandySF Apr 2016 #61
They can start investigating Jane next, hopefully they will get the lead out and Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #65
No imagine2015 Apr 2016 #79
Interesting fact I heard today pdsimdars Apr 2016 #82
If I had been attacked for years and years. Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #89
Really? Punkingal Apr 2016 #97
Jane figured out that an indictment would be the only way that her husband could get the nomination. Beacool Apr 2016 #88
Jane needs to stop doing interviews Yavin4 Apr 2016 #90
"Jane needs to stop doing interviews This is not helping his cause." Is that a sexist comment? imagine2015 May 2016 #104
Is Jane on the ballot somewhere? brooklynite May 2016 #116
Oh, the gloat will be FANTASTIC alcibiades_mystery Apr 2016 #95
damn that rule of law AgerolanAmerican May 2016 #101
Seems to me HRC supporters would be inclined to agree with Jane Sanders on this matter. Get it done 2banon May 2016 #105
Where are the tax returns, Jane? Why the foot dragging? Hekate May 2016 #108
This thread feeds into the ugliness and hatefulness of anti-Bernie commenters. senz May 2016 #113
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Jane Sanders to FBI: Ge...»Reply #0