2016 Postmortem

2banon

(7,321 posts)

71. I totally missed this re Kerry's comments AND Cruz's wife working for Sachs.

Sat Apr 23, 2016, 01:54 AM

Apr 2016

WoW. Holy Shite!

That puts things in quite a precarious predicament.

I never expect for the Justice Dept to nail Hillary any more than they'd go after Bush/Cheney. Fitzmas still burns in my memory..

And all the conflict of interest wrt Clinton Foundation, I recall Cheney and Halliburton. Maybe HRC and Bill has had that factoid in mind themselves and much more. who knows how these people with their privilege think

But if Cruz's wife has the recordings of these private meetings.. those might be used to "indict" Hillary not legally, but politically.

And here we go again..

Ground Hog Day Revisited.

I can't believe the Democratic Party Establishment is so eager to relive the political nightmare that was the 90's, all over again.

Just blows my mind. Really it does.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

136 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Senator Ted Cruz's wife has the Goldman vocal transcripts? Then Hillary needs to leave the race. [View all] ViseGrip Apr 2016 OP

I don't think it's Trump. If Ted is not the nominee, I'll bet he'll sell them to Trump if he has not ViseGrip Apr 2016 #1

Ted Cruz's wife has the transcripts ? FreakinDJ Apr 2016 #13

My take is that Cruz' wife heard the speeches and knows what was in them. "vocal" transcripts? snowy owl Apr 2016 #39

I hearing "recording" FreakinDJ Apr 2016 #44

actually it is very easy to tell them that dsc Apr 2016 #80

You said it yourself "anything other than archival use" FreakinDJ Apr 2016 #84

What does Hillary being a 'public figure' have to do COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #86

Just as Nixon attempted to stop the release of Watergate information FreakinDJ Apr 2016 #93

Nixon was a public official at the time. LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #112

The "Test" of a "Public Fiqures" is not as high as you think FreakinDJ Apr 2016 #126

Looking for any excuse to disqualify her. Too bad LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #130

It Is Called A Little Hand Held Digital Recorder... I'm sure that she could afford it! CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #49

Digital recording nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #53

I thought Sachs was evil for it's size treestar Apr 2016 #89

It will just be anonymously leaked Else You Are Mad Apr 2016 #76

No kidding! JackRiddler Apr 2016 #125

This is a bullsh_t OP. If she/he has such damaging material it would have already been released . . brush Apr 2016 #129

Kick! ViseGrip Apr 2016 #2

I don't think the hard core Aerows Apr 2016 #3

Our warnings are falling to deaf ears, sadly.... shalafi Apr 2016 #4

Well it's looking like if we lose, we get a more progressive candidate. ViseGrip Apr 2016 #6

Me either. Aerows Apr 2016 #7

It still so ironic to me that Hillary attacks Bernie on guns! Dustlawyer Apr 2016 #56

The dead children of Newtown are ironic to you? The Second Stone Apr 2016 #74

You are so wrong for this! You hurl this vile crap at me for political gain or you are too caught Dustlawyer Apr 2016 #75

Perfectly put. nt Else You Are Mad Apr 2016 #77

All corrupt lies by Bernie, the corrupt liar The Second Stone Apr 2016 #97

Whatever you say. I do recommend that you back away from the keyboard for awhile. Dustlawyer Apr 2016 #99

Well, I recommend that you vote for Bernie The Second Stone Apr 2016 #100

Second Stone, I admire your passion but you are simply wrong casperthegm Apr 2016 #102

I do believe this must be one of those Paid persons from Brock. Ignoring them is best.. they do glowing Apr 2016 #101

You know he is not a corrupt liar. What are you trying to achieve by claiming that he is? bjo59 Apr 2016 #104

And you know he is. What are you trying to acheive The Second Stone Apr 2016 #136

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2016 #103

Well said! n/t Aerows Apr 2016 #115

Hillary approved how many millions? billions? in gun sales for Remington? you know, the manufacturer magical thyme Apr 2016 #123

You're sick. Welcome to ignore. n/t TDale313 Apr 2016 #128

One donation slipped through creeksneakers2 Apr 2016 #61

That is a big pile of bullshit. Aerows Apr 2016 #64

Hope you slept well creeksneakers2 Apr 2016 #73

There you go again, ruining a perfectly good screed COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #88

This message was self-deleted by its author Aerows Apr 2016 #108

That makes it better exactly, how? Aerows Apr 2016 #111

Save your breath. peace13 Apr 2016 #82

Look at what I just replied to. Aerows Apr 2016 #109

one donation? more like 20... magical thyme Apr 2016 #124

We'll still get blamed. 840high Apr 2016 #17

The fuck I will Aerows Apr 2016 #25

Nailed it, Sister. Nailed it. 2banon Apr 2016 #68

There is no shame in advocating for the best possible nominee. grasswire Apr 2016 #62

You would think Aerows Apr 2016 #69

Realtively new here to DU beedle Apr 2016 #134

I can't wait for that "front" do go down. artislife Apr 2016 #5

They won't if it's repubs that have them. They don't want to run against Bernie. ViseGrip Apr 2016 #9

Any way is fine by me. nt artislife Apr 2016 #16

I hope Anonymous releases them Aerows Apr 2016 #28

Before Tuesday... ViseGrip Apr 2016 #46

Monday morning Aerows Apr 2016 #50

Please before it is too damn late Aerows Apr 2016 #10

Wait, you mean the GOP might launch attacks on Hillary Clinton? anigbrowl Apr 2016 #22

Attacks that are fully justified? Aerows Apr 2016 #30

GOP attacks on Hillary that are justified? That would be a first. apnu Apr 2016 #92

A career of evil will be ripe for the shredding yourpaljoey Apr 2016 #83

You really need to find a new literary genre for COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #90

All great authors nail their colors to the mast of truth yourpaljoey Apr 2016 #96

Not any more... COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #113

Needs video proof not just transcripts UNLESS it comes from Clinton herself. No one trust uponit7771 Apr 2016 #107

If Hillary Clinton showed up at your door Aerows Apr 2016 #110

I don't care if she did, I wouldn't doubt it at all and I have many post sayin she was underpaid uponit7771 Apr 2016 #114

See? Aerows Apr 2016 #117

You post nothing by attacks trying to take down Hillary Dem2 Apr 2016 #8

This is what is coming. Figure it out now, because this is what THEY will do! ViseGrip Apr 2016 #12

So transparent Dem2 Apr 2016 #19

Yes I have read 840high Apr 2016 #23

exactly, she promised him. He finds out after she's gone? I wonder what he says about this... ViseGrip Apr 2016 #47

I can't speak for the OP Aerows Apr 2016 #18

"ya'll" Dem2 Apr 2016 #21

I wasn't the one that Aerows Apr 2016 #26

I support both candidates Dem2 Apr 2016 #32

Put your mind at unease. Aerows Apr 2016 #33

You mean, with her words? We want to know what she said artislife Apr 2016 #20

Yeah right Dem2 Apr 2016 #24

Well, if there is anything in those tapes to damage Hillary, bring it! We all should know. Jitter65 Apr 2016 #11

The Cruz's will let you know, when they want you to know. ViseGrip Apr 2016 #14

can't "bring it" until she releases it. nt grasswire Apr 2016 #70

She did all these speeches because she knew she needed Wall Street to "bankroll" her campaign! reformist2 Apr 2016 #15

There's no pun there to intend eom rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #127

This must have a link, you know, for fact checking purposes? nt procon Apr 2016 #27

I don't doubt they are floating around Aerows Apr 2016 #29

Absolutely, the Foundation is enough, is enough, is enough! ViseGrip Apr 2016 #48

Hmmmm. okasha Apr 2016 #31

Oh my, I just peeked. sheshe2 Apr 2016 #34

That is a rather interesting transparency report Tarc Apr 2016 #37

Yet another proud member of Homophobes for Bernie. okasha Apr 2016 #42

Blatant homophobe and lover of far-right sourcing. Codeine Apr 2016 #41

Long ago, on a DU far away okasha Apr 2016 #45

And they want Bernie so badly. Coincidence? grossproffit Apr 2016 #59

I wonder if that person is really a Bernie supporter or a Republican troll? LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #116

I think that's nonsense. Codeine Apr 2016 #119

That is why I had Republican troll. LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #121

Wow. Looks like things are gonna get interesting. Octafish Apr 2016 #35

yes, he almost was able to stop George W. from becoming president grasswire Apr 2016 #72

ho-hum Tarc Apr 2016 #36

Even if they were released, it will make no difference to 99% of the voters Godhumor Apr 2016 #38

I'd say "it will make no difference to Hillary supporters." The primary will be over and snowy owl Apr 2016 #40

Her current supporters wouldn't care what she says to the 1%. Unicorn Apr 2016 #57

Her current supporters don't care about much of anything. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #67

+1000 nt Live and Learn Apr 2016 #85

We'll see. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #65

The "Whitey Tapes"!! DCBob Apr 2016 #43

Well that was a positive contribution. Aerows Apr 2016 #51

I found the transcripts here. RandySF Apr 2016 #52

I don't have faith in Hillary supporters to think for a second that Unicorn Apr 2016 #54

Seems like strategically, waiting to unload on a candidate would be most Lodestar Apr 2016 #55

Well hot damn, Eko Apr 2016 #58

If this turns out to be true then it it's a game changer PFunk1 Apr 2016 #60

The Goldman transcripts only have value to Bernie, not to Repugs. reformist2 Apr 2016 #63

Sure they do. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #66

I totally missed this re Kerry's comments AND Cruz's wife working for Sachs. 2banon Apr 2016 #71

Ok, off topic but why call these "vocal transcripts"? HereSince1628 Apr 2016 #78

Oh, no... Mike Nelson Apr 2016 #79

Why limit this to Cruz, Christie's wife Mary Pat also worked for Goldman-Sachs. gordianot Apr 2016 #81

Proof ms. Cruz has these? treestar Apr 2016 #87

Transcript Fairy to the rescue! randome Apr 2016 #91

The deal was that HRC was the only one to receive a transcript Autumn Colors Apr 2016 #94

Is this about a dream you had? Because that might be TMI. randome Apr 2016 #95

After the primaries, what risk are the transcripts? Onlooker Apr 2016 #98

Good point LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #118

Mika Brzenski: "I know a print reporter that has the transcripts" Oilwellian Apr 2016 #105

if she knows then hand them over Rosa Luxemburg Apr 2016 #132

My gut feeling is that there are plenty of snippets that can be manipulated annavictorious Apr 2016 #106

It was explained by someone else LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #120

Mitt Romney's 47% speech Aerows Apr 2016 #122

She's not stupid... speaktruthtopower Apr 2016 #131

I bet they're pretty short actually. cherokeeprogressive Apr 2016 #133

Nice try. nolabear Apr 2016 #135