Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience

progressoid

(50,204 posts)

6. Ha!

Reply to Festivito (Reply #3)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 01:14 AM

Mar 2016

I'm not sure he would understand the difference.

Yes, in fact, he did run back to some crackpot website to get another false right wing talking point. I'm done with him.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"We'll have to agree to disagree" [View all] progressoid Mar 2016 OP

I've heard the latest thing with those on the wrong side of this issue is... Tobin S. Mar 2016 #1

Yep, I've heard the "it's cyclical" or even "solar flares" excuse. progressoid Mar 2016 #4

We won't have to end capitalism. trotsky Mar 2016 #7

I guess so. Archae Mar 2016 #2

Got a couple of those in my family too. progressoid Mar 2016 #5

No. Never. It's bait. INSTEAD: "Let's agree THAT we disagree." Festivito Mar 2016 #3

Ha! progressoid Mar 2016 #6

It is the Deniers who are going legal on the Climate Scientists. yellowcanine May 2016 #8

Aw jeez, progressoid May 2016 #9