Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eppur_se_muova

(36,262 posts)
7. Density in this situation is calc'd same as for a solid sphere ...
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 10:12 PM
Feb 2012

that is, mass (measurements involving celestial mechanics treat this as a point mass) per unit volume, with the *empty* volume of the hollow sphere included. So any hollow object is going to have a low overall density. It might be made of very dense material, but there's no way to know that without more info than orbital characteristics. A space probe orbiting a hollow planet/Dyson sphere would spot something wrong right away (orbit too big for a given velocity); one orbiting a dense planet, likewise (orbit too small). But in either case it would be the overall density that would be most apparent, assuming at least approximately spherical symmetry.

A Dyson sphere would be mechanically supported (think a huge geodesic dome) so not dependent on photon pressure for support, unlike a statite.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»New Ultradense Planet Fou...»Reply #7