Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(101,554 posts)
7. I strongly suspect that these do not transport anything 'down' at all
Thu Aug 22, 2013, 07:13 PM
Aug 2013
The paper is about two dimensional turbulence. The "1.3 million cubic metres of water per second" is "in a north-western direction", it says later in the Yahoo article, not 'down' (or 'up').

What they're saying is that you get a body of water that stays together, the whole thing moving coherently around the ocean, thus potentially transporting water of different temperature or salinity to another area. Anything floating that ends up in it will stay in it. This does not stop fish from swimming in and out of it, however, or ships traversing it. They'd just notice a current different to what they expected.
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Satellites glimpse ultra-...»Reply #7