Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The roots of the creation story: An atheist’s take on the Bible [View all]
Most religions provide some version of a creation myth. This is, after all, necessary to elevate the role of a god or gods in the history of the worldto establish a Supreme Beings supremacy by making Him the ultimate source and creator of all things. So it is natural that the Bible begins with its creation myth.
The earliest parts of the Bible are the first five books. In the Jewish tradition, they are called by their Hebrew name: the Torah or law. In the Christian tradition, they are called by their Greek name: the Pentateuch or five books. Christianity spread through the Classical world, where Greek was the lingua franca, and early Christians used a third century BC Greek translation of the Old Testament known as the Septuagint after the seventy learned scholars supposedly responsible for the translation. Since Im going the whole distance, through both the Old and New Testaments, and since Im focusing on the King James Bible, and especially because my primary interest is the influence of Christianity on the West, I will be using the Greek versions of all of these names.
In the Greek/Christian version, each book of the Bible is given a descriptive name. The name of the first book is Genesis, the Greek word for birth or coming into being. It is a story of the creation of the world and of man. But right away, we encounter an intriguing clue about the origins of this origin myth.
The first line of the Bible is: In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. (Follow along in your hymnal, or read the King James Bible online.) The Hebrew word for God in this verse is Elohim. Anyone with a knowledge of Hebrew knows that the im suffix is plural. So this verse would seem to read, In the beginning, the gods created the heaven and the earth. But instead, Hebrew tradition requires that the plural be ignored and that Elohim be translated as God. Isaac Asimovwhose Guide to the Bible I am using as a fellow atheists reference sourcenotes that It is possible that in the very earliest traditions on which the Bible is based, the creation was indeed the work of a plurality of gods. The firmly monotheistic Biblical writers would carefully have eliminated such polytheism, but could not perhaps do anything with the firmly ingrained term Elohim. Bear in mind that the Bible was not definitively written down until the sixth century BC. Before that it was mostly memorized and passed down by oral tradition, much like the works of Homer (which were first written down at about the same time). So the initial verses would have been as firmly ingrained in the mind of the Hebrew public as Sing, goddess, the wrath of Achilles was for the Greeks. It would be impossible to change. The solution was to simply agree, as a social convention, to give Elohim a singular meaning, referring to only one God.
http://life.nationalpost.com/2013/02/08/the-roots-of-the-creation-story-an-atheists-take-on-the-bible/
The earliest parts of the Bible are the first five books. In the Jewish tradition, they are called by their Hebrew name: the Torah or law. In the Christian tradition, they are called by their Greek name: the Pentateuch or five books. Christianity spread through the Classical world, where Greek was the lingua franca, and early Christians used a third century BC Greek translation of the Old Testament known as the Septuagint after the seventy learned scholars supposedly responsible for the translation. Since Im going the whole distance, through both the Old and New Testaments, and since Im focusing on the King James Bible, and especially because my primary interest is the influence of Christianity on the West, I will be using the Greek versions of all of these names.
In the Greek/Christian version, each book of the Bible is given a descriptive name. The name of the first book is Genesis, the Greek word for birth or coming into being. It is a story of the creation of the world and of man. But right away, we encounter an intriguing clue about the origins of this origin myth.
The first line of the Bible is: In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. (Follow along in your hymnal, or read the King James Bible online.) The Hebrew word for God in this verse is Elohim. Anyone with a knowledge of Hebrew knows that the im suffix is plural. So this verse would seem to read, In the beginning, the gods created the heaven and the earth. But instead, Hebrew tradition requires that the plural be ignored and that Elohim be translated as God. Isaac Asimovwhose Guide to the Bible I am using as a fellow atheists reference sourcenotes that It is possible that in the very earliest traditions on which the Bible is based, the creation was indeed the work of a plurality of gods. The firmly monotheistic Biblical writers would carefully have eliminated such polytheism, but could not perhaps do anything with the firmly ingrained term Elohim. Bear in mind that the Bible was not definitively written down until the sixth century BC. Before that it was mostly memorized and passed down by oral tradition, much like the works of Homer (which were first written down at about the same time). So the initial verses would have been as firmly ingrained in the mind of the Hebrew public as Sing, goddess, the wrath of Achilles was for the Greeks. It would be impossible to change. The solution was to simply agree, as a social convention, to give Elohim a singular meaning, referring to only one God.
http://life.nationalpost.com/2013/02/08/the-roots-of-the-creation-story-an-atheists-take-on-the-bible/
Much more at link....
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 2889 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
While this is a minority view now, it definitely has a fighting chance. If we see the
dimbear
Feb 2013
#6
"One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact"
struggle4progress
Feb 2013
#7