Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Nature is not indifferent if we are not. gtar100 Nov 2012 #1
EIther way, it's anthropomorphizing inanimate objects. rug Nov 2012 #2
It couldn't be that anthropomorphy is the correct moral/philosophical view? Fumesucker Nov 2012 #3
I think that is a mis-characterization of quantum theory. redgreenandblue Nov 2012 #4
Sorry, I don't buy that. rug Nov 2012 #6
Your argument is convincing Fumesucker Nov 2012 #10
You appear to be separating yourself from nature. gtar100 Nov 2012 #11
No, but I'm not attributing my characteristics to the universe either. rug Nov 2012 #12
Nor am I being so generic. But, to coin a phrase or two, gtar100 Nov 2012 #20
Indifference is unique to neither humanity nor animate objects dmallind Nov 2012 #13
Really? How is a rock indifferent? rug Nov 2012 #14
How is it not? dmallind Nov 2012 #15
To be indifferent, something first have to know things differ. rug Nov 2012 #16
Utter tosh. Does a baby need to understand differential diagnosis to be asymptomatic? dmallind Nov 2012 #17
Utter tosh? I'm not the one claiming rocks can be indifferent. rug Nov 2012 #18
It's utter tosh to claim they can be anything BUT - and your own cites bear that out. dmallind Nov 2012 #19
I must stop now. The lamp is glowering at me. rug Nov 2012 #21
So raising money for charities disgusts you? JKingman Nov 2012 #5
To the contrary, people who try to put words in my mouth disgust me. rug Nov 2012 #7
Then perhaps you could attempt to explain the purpose of this thread JKingman Nov 2012 #8
Two reasons. rug Nov 2012 #9
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»God lets babies die … so ...»Reply #19