Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
17. if they were not written by god, then why do they have any more validity than any other text?
Wed Sep 12, 2012, 04:04 PM
Sep 2012

so, basically, you are agreeing that dogma is a human invention. So humans run these institutions... to benefit themselves and to accrue power on this earth, not on any spiritual plane, it seems, or, perhaps, no god is involved in the way these institutions make decisions since they are obviously wrong... so... the dogma is wrong, results in repression for women, but that's just the way it is?

The comparison to the U.S. doesn't hold. I was born in this nation. I vote, along with others, for the way in which this nation is run. The church does not offer that and, more importantly, no one has citizenship in a church. It is a choice to attend a particular church. It's not a nationality with restrictions on immigration from one entity to another.

The church, on the other hand, claims its leadership has a divine mandate and inspiration. If you don't believe that - what is it about the dogma that compels you to defend it?

I have not made the claim that I have the right to tell someone else what they should or shouldn't believe. However, I am saying I find no logic in the beliefs and wonder how someone can defend association with an entity that will not allow women to have positions of leadership, for example, or a group that excommunicates the doctor and mother of a 9 year old who was raped and then had an abortion but not her rapist because, the church said, the rapist sin wasn't as bad.

How in the name of all that is ethical does anyone continue an association with an institution that makes such a claim?

It used to be considered impolite to discuss religion and politics (but here we are on a forum for that express purpose.) But when that religion works to oppress an entire gender - well, it's like abolitionists speaking out against slavery - such religious belief violates the very philosophical foundations of this nation. Such beliefs are in opposition to the best practices of any nation anywhere in the world.

I don't get why anyone would want to be associated with such a group.



10 suckers and it's shame thelordofhell Sep 2012 #1
yep... You are correct... Yooperman Sep 2012 #2
My daughter's English teacher exboyfil Sep 2012 #3
What perplexes me the most is how we can stand back and agree that Mormonism (for one) is BS NightWatcher Sep 2012 #4
I love this post :) Fix The Stupid Sep 2012 #5
You win the thread. cleanhippie Sep 2012 #6
If one assumes that all the stories of a given religion are "non reality based" cbayer Sep 2012 #7
Well, reality-based means a specific thing RainDog Sep 2012 #8
Again, if you start from the assumption that all historic religious references and stories cbayer Sep 2012 #9
I didn't say "all" - I said the texts are obviously full of errors RainDog Sep 2012 #10
Agree that the texts are contradictory and, therefore, can not all be true. cbayer Sep 2012 #11
"Most people do not read them literally or think they were actually written by a god" - Really? cleanhippie Sep 2012 #13
Yes. This "gradation" of belief is how people say "I'm not like that" RainDog Sep 2012 #32
if they were not written by god, then why do they have any more validity than any other text? RainDog Sep 2012 #17
A recent post here highlighted a poll which showed that most people who consider themselves cbayer Sep 2012 #19
That's true, people will make their own decisions RainDog Sep 2012 #21
Are you really comparing all the flavors of different religious groups with the KKK? cbayer Sep 2012 #24
I was talking about your attempt to say "it's personal" RainDog Sep 2012 #26
You appear to be an anti-theist. Am I correct about that? cbayer Sep 2012 #30
My OP was about religion in general RainDog Sep 2012 #31
Denial of what? cbayer Sep 2012 #33
Thanks for this reply RainDog Sep 2012 #35
I think we probably agree to a large extent as well. cbayer Sep 2012 #36
I would really like people's answer to my questions RainDog Sep 2012 #34
It's also a reality-based fact okasha Sep 2012 #12
Those changes are happening due to societal pressure and the inability to defend those beliefs cleanhippie Sep 2012 #14
That's true, basically they are caving in to secular ethics and morality... Humanist_Activist Sep 2012 #15
Those changes come about because people's reality shows them their belief group is wrong RainDog Sep 2012 #23
In a nutshell, Joseph Smith was a conman. He was caught flatfooted in fakery and deceit. dimbear Sep 2012 #16
I don't see any difference between Mormonism and other belief systems RainDog Sep 2012 #18
Many fundamentalist christians aren't seeing the difference either cbayer Sep 2012 #20
Fundamenalists are part of the same group RainDog Sep 2012 #22
You are doing too much lumping and no splitting. cbayer Sep 2012 #25
How do you want to split it? RainDog Sep 2012 #27
You have already made up your mind here. cbayer Sep 2012 #28
LOL RainDog Sep 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»What Mormonism teaches me...»Reply #17