Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,365 posts)
7. I agree that parents should be able to have their children
Sat Apr 7, 2018, 10:21 AM
Apr 2018

Last edited Sat Apr 7, 2018, 01:34 PM - Edit history (1)

follow the precepts of a religion, as long as it doesn't harm the children physically. I strongly disagree with the state dictating or banning any sort of religious behavior that does not cause physical or mental harm. It is not the role of a just and free state to do that, I believe. Period.

Has Steve Bannon been visiting Austria lately? no_hypocrisy Apr 2018 #1
It's very bad news if little girls are being forced by their parents to wear hijab. Mariana Apr 2018 #2
Perhaps my sarcasm detector is broken. bitterross Apr 2018 #3
Which part do you think is sarcastic? Mariana Apr 2018 #4
At some point religious indoctrination of children becomes abuse Major Nikon Apr 2018 #5
Personally, I believe ALL religious indoctrination Brainstormy Apr 2018 #52
Pretty much all of it. bitterross Apr 2018 #8
If you start going too far into policing religious beliefs marylandblue Apr 2018 #10
I support freedom of religion Mariana Apr 2018 #11
Indoctrination. guillaumeb Apr 2018 #16
Which beliefs would those be, Gil? nt. Mariana Apr 2018 #18
Semiotics. guillaumeb Apr 2018 #19
So atheist parents are indoctrinating their children with Lordquinton Apr 2018 #20
Another ironic post. guillaumeb Apr 2018 #21
So semiotics was intended to be irony? Lordquinton Apr 2018 #23
Your misunderstanding does not affect my point. guillaumeb Apr 2018 #26
Your point makes no sense Lordquinton Apr 2018 #29
Your response makes no sense. guillaumeb Apr 2018 #32
What was the point or sense or whatever else you are alleging? Major Nikon Apr 2018 #43
What is the point of your name calling? Or is there one? guillaumeb Apr 2018 #44
What name did you get called? Major Nikon Apr 2018 #47
Reread your own reply. guillaumeb Apr 2018 #49
Good thing I wasnt expecting an answer Major Nikon Apr 2018 #51
You apparently ignored the answer. guillaumeb Apr 2018 #58
Kinda hard to ignore that I predicted your answer perfectly Major Nikon Apr 2018 #59
"I'm rubber you're glue" Lordquinton Apr 2018 #57
When you invent your own meanings for words, it's easy to see how everyone else is ignorant Major Nikon Apr 2018 #60
Yeah, that's a pretty weird answer. Mariana Apr 2018 #22
You should feel special Lordquinton Apr 2018 #24
It's like he just picked a word at random Mariana Apr 2018 #25
Maybe it's a dart board Lordquinton Apr 2018 #28
#19 was quite clear. guillaumeb Apr 2018 #27
So, if you reframe the argument it changes the tone? Lordquinton Apr 2018 #30
Do you think I used the word incorrectly? Mariana Apr 2018 #31
Look at #2. guillaumeb Apr 2018 #33
I did look at #2, when I posted it. I used the word correctly. Mariana Apr 2018 #34
There was more to my response. guillaumeb Apr 2018 #35
Yes. Mariana Apr 2018 #36
I understand your motivation. guillaumeb Apr 2018 #37
... Mariana Apr 2018 #38
Agreed. guillaumeb Apr 2018 #39
There is no doctrine for atheism Major Nikon Apr 2018 #45
You avoided my point. guillaumeb Apr 2018 #46
When you invent your own definitions, points are hard to follow Major Nikon Apr 2018 #48
More avoidance. guillaumeb Apr 2018 #50
Avoidance of what? Major Nikon Apr 2018 #53
thank you. Brainstormy Apr 2018 #54
Seems to be the house of cards many of the other fallacies rely on Major Nikon Apr 2018 #55
I agree that parents should be able to have their children MineralMan Apr 2018 #7
So you draw the line at physical harm. Mental harm gets a pass? bitterross Apr 2018 #9
Read carefully, please. Mariana Apr 2018 #12
Write more carefully. You most certainly did offer support. bitterross Apr 2018 #40
I oppose repeal of the 1st Amendment. Mariana Apr 2018 #41
Bad analogy. bitterross Apr 2018 #42
We don't differ at all on whether it's wrong. Mariana Apr 2018 #56
Mental or physical harm. MineralMan Apr 2018 #13
It isnt ok. It is a problem of conflicting rights Voltaire2 Apr 2018 #15
Seeing as Thyla Apr 2018 #6
The ruling coalition in Austria includes Voltaire2 Apr 2018 #14
Aimed at a generally right wing audience? guillaumeb Apr 2018 #17
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Bad news: Austria seeks h...»Reply #7