Religion
In reply to the discussion: Science has NO NEED TO reconcile with RELIGION ! [View all]tama
(9,137 posts)that the tentative answer to Scott starting with "If" meant that there was readiness to play and look at what "Quantum faith" could mean - if taken even half seriously. But if you insist, we can play also (some distortion of) PoMo and assume that your interpretations of implicate meanings wrapped in text, however illogical, are as valid as the Author's (declared dead by PoMo faith, rest in peace, sit tibit terra levis, etc. etc.).
Now, what propositional statements could Quantum Faith (QF), aplied to itself, consider valid? As first suggested, the measurement of truth values of propositional statements of QF would need be faithfull to Uncertainty Principle, to stay consistent. Second, the QF could by certain degree of uncertainty be the superposition of various observables, such as beliefs of and about the QF itself.