Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Is Richard Dawkins destroying his reputation? [View all]beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)162. Oh yes he did, lots of things:
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
208 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Those whose only goal is to attack religion have no interest in reading comprehension
Starboard Tack
Jun 2015
#102
So by that logic, you're going to start posting about the pope and his reputation, right?
trotsky
Jun 2015
#15
The pope is the center of the universe for theophobes and belligerent atheists
Starboard Tack
Jun 2015
#93
It makes you a bigot. Same as if you were opposed to interracial marriage.
Warren Stupidity
Jun 2015
#167
How is that deflection? She posted this OP. Or did you miss that reality?
Goblinmonger
Jun 2015
#110
"a machination of the Father of Lies that seeks to confuse and deceive the children of God."
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#173
"At stake are the lives of many children who will be discriminated against in advance"
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#174
"and deprived of their human development given by a father and a mother and willed by God."
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#175
"The family is threatened by growing efforts on the part of some to redefine the very institution...
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#176
Denying someone their human rights because he believes they're inferior does make him a bigot.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#189
"Being opposed to gay marriage does not make someone a homophobe or bigot"
Warren Stupidity
Jun 2015
#140
Apparently he's ignored all of the previous posts about pope homophobe.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#157
Those links are good to have handy whenever people are singing the pope's praises.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#182
See your last post where you lashed out at atheists for calling out your homophobic comments:
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#191
Did you vote in the GD poll? And defend religious homophobia in the thread?
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#194
As you can see I'm not the only one who thinks homophobic behaviour makes one a homophobe:
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#196
According to the definition at religoustolerance.org both you and the pope are homophobic.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#203
I am not your "fan" and I don't find your defense of religious bigotry the least bit amusing.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#207
Now you're saying that people who are opposed to interracial marriage aren't bigots.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#198
Pope Francis’ new clothes: Why his progressive image is white smoke and mirrors
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#159
Plus you know, like lecturing at Oxford, some sort of backwater has been unknown school.
Warren Stupidity
Jun 2015
#82
"admiration for Darwin in the way a schoolboy might worship a sporting giant."
Warren Stupidity
Jun 2015
#11
So you understand that this is basically a reverse argument from authority right?
Promethean
Jun 2015
#22
Irrelevant. It's a chance to post something negative about DAWKINS!!!111!!!!
cleanhippie
Jun 2015
#23
Clearly. I mean, everyone else who doesn't see things your way must be stupid, right? n/t
trotsky
Jun 2015
#53
You so misjudge me and I am sure you have your reasons, but this is really about you, not me.
cbayer
Jun 2015
#41
And to think I was so worried about who would step up to post malarkey articles about Atheists
Heddi
Jun 2015
#39
His last peer-reviewed scientific paper was published over three decades ago
struggle4progress
Jun 2015
#40
I still think he has performed an important role and, in the end, will be honored for that.
cbayer
Jun 2015
#43
The atheisms of Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud were influential long before Dawkins appeared;
struggle4progress
Jun 2015
#58