Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Is Richard Dawkins destroying his reputation? [View all]pokerfan
(27,677 posts)17. Stupid scientists anyway
Why can't he be normal and worship LeBron James like everyone else?
What an odd article.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
208 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Those whose only goal is to attack religion have no interest in reading comprehension
Starboard Tack
Jun 2015
#102
So by that logic, you're going to start posting about the pope and his reputation, right?
trotsky
Jun 2015
#15
The pope is the center of the universe for theophobes and belligerent atheists
Starboard Tack
Jun 2015
#93
It makes you a bigot. Same as if you were opposed to interracial marriage.
Warren Stupidity
Jun 2015
#167
How is that deflection? She posted this OP. Or did you miss that reality?
Goblinmonger
Jun 2015
#110
"a machination of the Father of Lies that seeks to confuse and deceive the children of God."
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#173
"At stake are the lives of many children who will be discriminated against in advance"
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#174
"and deprived of their human development given by a father and a mother and willed by God."
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#175
"The family is threatened by growing efforts on the part of some to redefine the very institution...
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#176
Denying someone their human rights because he believes they're inferior does make him a bigot.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#189
"Being opposed to gay marriage does not make someone a homophobe or bigot"
Warren Stupidity
Jun 2015
#140
Apparently he's ignored all of the previous posts about pope homophobe.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#157
Those links are good to have handy whenever people are singing the pope's praises.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#182
See your last post where you lashed out at atheists for calling out your homophobic comments:
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#191
Did you vote in the GD poll? And defend religious homophobia in the thread?
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#194
As you can see I'm not the only one who thinks homophobic behaviour makes one a homophobe:
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#196
According to the definition at religoustolerance.org both you and the pope are homophobic.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#203
I am not your "fan" and I don't find your defense of religious bigotry the least bit amusing.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#207
Now you're saying that people who are opposed to interracial marriage aren't bigots.
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#198
Pope Francis’ new clothes: Why his progressive image is white smoke and mirrors
beam me up scottie
Jun 2015
#159
Plus you know, like lecturing at Oxford, some sort of backwater has been unknown school.
Warren Stupidity
Jun 2015
#82
"admiration for Darwin in the way a schoolboy might worship a sporting giant."
Warren Stupidity
Jun 2015
#11
So you understand that this is basically a reverse argument from authority right?
Promethean
Jun 2015
#22
Irrelevant. It's a chance to post something negative about DAWKINS!!!111!!!!
cleanhippie
Jun 2015
#23
Clearly. I mean, everyone else who doesn't see things your way must be stupid, right? n/t
trotsky
Jun 2015
#53
You so misjudge me and I am sure you have your reasons, but this is really about you, not me.
cbayer
Jun 2015
#41
And to think I was so worried about who would step up to post malarkey articles about Atheists
Heddi
Jun 2015
#39
His last peer-reviewed scientific paper was published over three decades ago
struggle4progress
Jun 2015
#40
I still think he has performed an important role and, in the end, will be honored for that.
cbayer
Jun 2015
#43
The atheisms of Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud were influential long before Dawkins appeared;
struggle4progress
Jun 2015
#58