Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Comment on the Bible [View all]darkstar3
(8,763 posts)30. Two things.
One, survey after survey, and personal experience after personal experience, show that Christians don't read their Bible.
Two, you've moved the goalposts. Only in your own made up definition does the verb "to read" mean to occasionally read pieces of a document. "To read" something for the rest of the world means to actually, you know, read it from beginning to end. And if you'd actually understood the reference to an EULA in the OP, you'd know that's really the only interpretation of the statement made within.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Having the Bible read to you is entirely different than reading it on your own.
darkstar3
Apr 2012
#32
So, in response to my request that you not make it personal, you make it even more personal.
cbayer
Apr 2012
#33
"But I'd love to hear your apologist thoughts on why Paul isn't those things."
ZombieHorde
Apr 2012
#25
Lol, I didn't get pissed off. Just thought your comment was not appropriate for this forum.
eqfan592
Apr 2012
#40
we should be grateful people do NOT do all the stuff the bible says they MUST do to
msongs
Apr 2012
#4
I'd suggest that they read it "selectively" ... and they count on you and I not
JoePhilly
Apr 2012
#17
They don't have to read the bible, that is for those non-christians.. see they are born-again.
LiberalArkie
Apr 2012
#10